"styx" numbers for boron hydrides
> I apologise to readers who are not concerned.
> On 20 Apr 2003 17:49:08 -0500, Brian Sandle
>>> On 19 Apr 2003 21:19:53 -0500, Brian Sandle
>>>>This is quite a bit off topic for chemistry and Freemasonry
>>> Then why are you posting it in those venues.
>>Someone wrote recently that he uses alt.freemasonry to contact other
>>Freemasons, and to find out about Freemasonry.
> When are *you* going to ask something about Freemasonry or, in this
I know you will continue to deny Freemasonry's mystical significance of
> about chemistry?
As a school teacher you passed on a syllabus. And that is what you think
chemistry is. Nomenclature is taught, but not much about how it is thought
up. So you would not consider how chemical nomenclature is thought up to
be part of chemistry.
If you search google groups for my articles you will find how the
Theosophists called a substance they could see `occultum' presumably
because of its hiddenness to the chemical procedures of the time. Now we
see it has the name `tritium'.
Now we have been asked why `styx' has been used in connection with boron
molecule geometry. So you say we need a separate newsgroup for chemical
nomenclature formation, because it is nothing to do with `actual
chemistry'. In `actual chemistry' you just accept the naming conventions,
don't even consider questioning them. You totally wipe such
considerations from your mind, and get on with honourably finding out
about the chemistry.
You ask questions and when it is explained to
> you that the question is off topic you ignore the poster and waffle on
> about the subject and claim that some other poster, who has already
> been explained to you as being an off topic nutter, posts about this
> rubbish and therefore you should be permitted to as well.
> The simple answer, Brian, is that we cannot stop you from posting to
> a.f or s.c. We are asking you to remain on topic. You consistently
> refuse and complain when you get abused. If you remained on topic then
> you would receive reasonable answers. By the way I have never referred
> to you as a troll.
Then which troll were you refering to Peter as supporting?
I think I will do so from now on. After all if it
> quacks like a duck ...
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----