PANETH & PETERS DISCOVERED COLD FUSION FIRST 
Author Message
 PANETH & PETERS DISCOVERED COLD FUSION FIRST

   From E&TR October 1990.
    "  1926 Fritz Paneth and Kurt Peters in Berlin first claim to have
observed the fusion of hydrogen under pressure to form helium in finely
divided palladium metal. It was already well known at the time that
certain metals such as palladium can absorb large quantities of
hydrogen. In a short note immediaelty following this claim, Nature
issued the statement: " This announcement, if correct, is of great
importance and will evoke even more intereest than the claim by Miethe
and Stammereich to have tran{*filter*}ed mercury into gold...Belief or
disbelief in the ...message must be reserved pending further and more
definite evidence." After substantial criticisms and further studies,
the two researchers withdrew the claim of helium synthesis."
    "  1927 The Swedish scientist John Tanberg proposes using
electrolysis to force hydrogen into palladium metal. After obtaining
heavy water from Niels Bohr in 1932, he filled palladium rods with
deuterium by electrolysis and then applied a large electric current to
heat the palladium. He warned coworkers to go home during the
experiments after calculting that all the deuterium would be equivalent
to 1000kg of dynamite, if exploded. He observed no effect. "

   I disagree with those people who claim Pons & Fleischmann discovered
cold fusion first. And anyone reading the physics history can see that
the Howl of the Boeitians was just as fierce in the past as it was
shortly after the 1989 Pons & Fleischmann announcement. It is obvious
to me from reading the above
that these researchers had the intention of gaining energy. They were
after a new source of energy. All the more remarkable since it comes
before
the nuclear fission industry by about 20 years. And although these
early
researchers did not have a term such as "cold fusion", they were
seeking the same phenomenon as post 1989 researchers.
  Hence, I reaffirm my statement that what Pons and Fleishmann were
after in "cold fusion" was nothing new to the art from what Paneth &
Peters, and Tanberg sought. And all of those patent claims by Pons &
Fleischmann are practically null and void because Paneth and Peters
were first.
   What is new to the art of cold fusion is an explanation and an
engineering technique which induces it. This is what I bring which is
new to the art started by Paneth & Peters, advertised and given
worldwide publicity by Pons & Fleischmann -- but nothing new as per
Paneth & Peters. I give the explanation as
(1) spontaneous neutron materialization (SNM). And what is new to the
art is a technique of inducing SNM which I claim is by running a
variable electric current i or changing electric potential difference V
through the fuel mass. This is merely PULSING, which Canon has verified
to be true.
  If the Nobel ever decides to give a Nobel prize for "cold fusion"
then they are too late since Paneth & Peters are gone. The Nobel should
not give a prize to Pons & Fleischmann since there work only
reintroduced Paneth & Peters work. The Nobel prize for "cold fusion"
thus, only rightfully should go to Ludwig Plutonium for finding the
correct explanation and means of inducing SNM which is cold fusion.
   According to my theory of SNM every fuel mass shows this phenomenon.
It is not restricted to hydrogen with palladium or titanium substitute.
The phenomenon of SNM will work with just pure iron as a fuel mass and
no
water or heavy water, just pure iron.
    All that needs to be researched and reported is the presence of
"new heavier isotopes" in the SNM fuel mass which was not present
before the pulsing. This will confirm SNM and the violation of
conservation of energy/mass. Then what needs to be done is to find what
fuel mass under what pulsing conditions enables the fuel mass to
maximize (be lit) SNM. SNM is a form of radioactivity as per Dirac in
Directions in Physics.



Mon, 27 Jan 1997 05:07:53 GMT
 PANETH & PETERS DISCOVERED COLD FUSION FIRST

Quote:

>                                    The Nobel prize for "cold fusion"
> thus, only rightfully should go to Ludwig Plutonium for finding the
> correct explanation and means of inducing SNM which is cold fusion.
>    According to my theory of SNM every fuel mass shows this phenomenon.
> It is not restricted to hydrogen with palladium or titanium substitute.
> The phenomenon of SNM will work with just pure iron as a fuel mass and
> no
> water or heavy water, just pure iron.

Ludwig--
        Shouldn't discussion of something called "SNM" be taking place
in alt.sex.{*filter*}.particle.physics?

                                                        -- K.



Tue, 28 Jan 1997 12:59:29 GMT
 
 [ 2 post ] 

 Relevant Pages 

1. Archaeology is the key to discover cold fusion

2. I think we should NOT discover cold fusion!

3. Cold fusion discovered

4. First Commercial Application Of Cold Fusion !!!

5. Cold Fusion Nanotech Breakthrough - Respected Japanese Scientist Quietly Claims a First

6. Particle Accelerators & Cold Fusion

7. Scientific Journal Suggests Fraud Possible In Texas A&M Cold Fusion

8. FAQ-Table for cold fusion & References

9. A&M Panel Finds No Evidence of Fraud in Cold Fusion Research

10. <None>=Hot vs Cold Fusion/to Carr&Britz

11. OTA Report on Communication Technology & Cold Fusion

12. Cold Fusion&Slow Oxidation etc.


 
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software