Good point about changing eyes. As I understand it - and I'm considering
lasik - the surgery should only be performed on people whose myopia has
pretty much stopped changing. With most people, that happens in our 20s,
and our prescriptions don't change dramatically until we start needing
reading glasses in middle age. My own eyes, I think, have varied only a
diopter over a decade. But now that I'm 48, I'm developing ever-changing
presbyopia- and Lasik won't help that, may only make it worse.
Nancy
Quote:
> With all the talk regarding Lasik, I haven't seen discussion of what would
> seem to be an obvious shortcoming. How does this procedure address the problem
> of a gradually changing eye prescription. Lasik is far too expensive to have
> one's eyes tuned up every couple of years, or is the idea to simply to get
> people close to normal and then if future deterioration occurred glasses
> could be used again?