
A pointing-out of why we are so ignorant!
Anything from, theories by deranged minds, to optimally approximated
explanatory descriptions or rational science-aligned PROOFS of whatever by
better organised minds, can have an opioid effect on their forgers as well
as followers.
But especially strongly so *at the time and a limited time after* such
theories are being "paid actention to". This effect is equivalent to when
religious individuals start praying or studying the bible - yet again - to
refresh their "religious fix" (i.e. their way of coping).
As you probably realise, the above examples of "Ambi-advantageously Evolved"
AEVASIVE focuses of actentions" is belongs to the same category of
endogenous opiate shooting-up behaviours that e.g. "runners getting high on
running" "politicians getting off on politicking", "philosophers getting
free from anxiety and feeling good by philosophising", mountain-climbers
getting eustress by mountain-climbing"; and so on and on.....!
By (focuses of) "actention" (from "activity"+"attention") I refer to that
anything we individuals do - any focus of attention or preoccupation
(whether pre{*filter*}ly mental or motor in character) occurs in
'brainspace-time' in the neurophysioanatomical form of sufficiently
energised (by Reticular Activating Type [or "RAT"] neurons) actention
"modules" (schematically considered).
"Actention modules and their organisation (in many cases by way of "mutual
inhibition/competition", loosely according to the principle of
"centre/surround excitation/inhibition") is of course a very much schematic
a view. But even so, it can be appreciated that a "central (in the brain)
switching-station" is apparently located in the basal ganglia.
[Actention-modules *that are not functionally/adaptationally compatible*
compete for {*filter*} by way of either (or both) innate and conditioned-in
rules/mechanisms for *mutual inhibition*. By the subtle nature of "things
varying and being different", our actention modules are nearly always
unequally "energised/motivated/cued". (More specifically, this being the
result of the shifting interactivity (brain-synthesis) of factors -
"actention selecting factors - that at any one time constitutes a
individual's "Total Selective Situation".)
A "Sum-Total Selective Situation" have 3 simultaneous meanings:
1. It reflects each individual's legacy (or geno-phenotypal expressions) of
primal needs/instincts/drives, as these were at least originally/ancestrally
*adaptive* behaviours and/or responses;
2. current environmental cues;
3. past (i.e. *within* the individual's life-time) *Conditioned-in* cues -
some of which co-motivate centrally by way of dynamic 'brain/memory states'
that deserve to be called/classified with something like the acronym CURSES
(or, more explicitly derived, 'CCKHHURRSSEES').
The 'neurophysiological opposite' to "focuses of actention" are
states of "selective Hibernation". Such states, often (or always?)
Endorphin-mediated, can be fundamentally explained neurophysiologically (by
help of the thoroughly science-aligned concEPT: "Reticular Activating Type
[RAT] neurons") and they can be directly equated with "selective
'unConsciousness' "; and, inversely, this explanatory classification lends
itself to a simple, but no less profound and valid, definition of
"Consciousness" (a notion and definition "a la EPT").
By the the way, so much for debates on the topic of "free will".
-------------------------------------------
Yours,
Peter Fellin (alias Mr. Knowitall):
Originator of **AEVASIVE** (an acronymal grasping-tool);
Pesterous promoter and producer of 'Provocative Omniscientific Opinions'
[but only of those containable within my logically leak-proof, and
science-aligned, Platform Of Terms]
(Perennial) Undergraduate at The School of Life;
Sole Institutor and Chief Supremo of EAIMC Internetional Ptd Lty. %-]
%-] is the copiously rited and prot?cted trademark of EAIMC.
All rights deserved.
Quote:
>G'day
>Try bolting lying down for a change. :-)
>Yours,
>Peter
>>Um, could you repeat that please? Perhaps you should look into
>hybernating
>>some of your dopamine neurons as opposed to messing with anything
>endorphin.
>>-Bolt
>>-