>I'm new in this forum but read many of the recent posts in search of
>some answers. I am bothered with the attitude of some against Dr.
>Feliciano.
>Should we not encourage disclosure of any medical discovery by any
>scientist who believes he has found a solution to a problem so that
>others may either adopt it or do further research on the proposed cure
>(and maybe even disprove it)? Whether the protocol is adopted or
>stopped (scientifically disproved), the result will be beneficial. If
>Dr. Feliciano were European or North American, would he still be called
>a "quack" or would these people refer to him as a "pioneer"? This first
>world attitude should be classified as a psychological problem.
>On spending a fortune travelling, this is a risk one has to take. If
>the protocol is adopted, it will eventually be cheaper to get
>medication. Asians, too, spend a fortune going to the United States and
>Europe for treatment if they are unavailable. Should they just take our
>word that these doctors are not "quacks"?
>If someone believes he found a cure for other diseases like HIV or
>cancer, I hope they would still come out in the open, despite
>criticisms like these.