
PROSTATITIS Digest - 18 Jun 2000 to 19 Jun 2000 (#2000-280)
Quote:
>What I don't understand is why AEF method is so controversial?
Well, a number of people do not subscribe to the infection theory. They
actually have some interesting arguments. The main problem is that
antibiotics do not seem to cure the illness.
Another reason AEF is controversial, IMO, is that he is claiming to cure
90% of his prostatitis patients. I do not believe that he is. I am not
alone.
Quote:
>but now they say that antibiotics don't penitrate the
>prostate.
Yes they do penetrate it but not real well I guess.
Quote:
> I must be missing something here? If prostatitus is often caused by a
>bacterial infection...
Maybe not always.
Quote:
>( and the Dr that proscribed antibiotics without doing any
>cultures or massage must have thought it was).
Maybe he couldn't think of anything else to do.
Quote:
> And there is a ability to drain
>the prostate and look for pathogens...why don't they do it?
Costs a lot of money for one. And time. To do it well, that is.
Quote:
>If AEF's method involved a full moon and candles with incantations...I
>could see
>it as being a bit more controversial... but what is so contorversial about
>draining the prostate and looking for pathogens... and having a lab right next
>door to your office to get quick results from cultures?
I agree that the basic protocol is not particularly controversial. What
seems to irritate people is that this doctor claims to have some sort of
unique protocol that one must travel to the Phillipines to
peruse. Hardly. Many other docs could do the same thing. Also, the cure
rate is another problem -- the main one in my book.
Quote:
>------------------------------
Bob
"Hi! I'm a signature virus.
Please put me in your sigline and help me spread."