Hearing hazards: Specific frequencies rather than DbA? 
Author Message
 Hearing hazards: Specific frequencies rather than DbA?

Hi folks, me again...
Our Union is concerned about the exposure that our members are
getting in a specific (narrow) frequency range.

The frequency is high in the end of audible sound, and is quite
intense.  It causes some transitory tinitus and 'headaches' in
some individuals.  Dual hearing protection is worn (Peltor-type
high noise environment plus c{*filter*}plugs of various types).  Despite
the PPE, the noise persists and wipes out all other audible sound.

Howe can this high frequency (audible range) be measured against
exposure limits?  I would expect that the more damaging frequency
range (to our cilia, etc.) would mandate a lower exposure limit.
Am I correct in any conventional way?  

We are strongly urging the employers assistance by
having them prescribe Clark-type ANC headsets and mics.
 Would this be 'worth' the expense?

Please post to these ng's as I feel that many 'out there' are
also interested in any answers.


Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers
Safety and Health, Cab Committee
Revesltoke BC Canada



Fri, 11 Dec 1998 03:00:00 GMT
 Hearing hazards: Specific frequencies rather than DbA?

Quote:
>getting in a specific (narrow) frequency range.

>The frequency is high in the end of audible sound, and is quite
>intense.  It causes some transitory tinitus and 'headaches' in
>some individuals.  Dual hearing protection is worn (Peltor-type
>high noise environment plus c{*filter*}plugs of various types).  Despite

>We are strongly urging the employers assistance by
>having them prescribe Clark-type ANC headsets and mics.

Bob,
Could you be more specific as to both the frequency and intensity of the
noise ?  High frequency industrial noise does not have as much energy
as low frequency ( <1000 Hz) and double protection should block out
most.  As for ANC earmuffs, they are not effective at higher frequncy
requirements and would probably be a waste of money.  This is all, of course,
predicated on what the actual exposure is.


Sat, 12 Dec 1998 03:00:00 GMT
 
 [ 2 post ] 

 Relevant Pages 

1. Nice to hear SB rather that JD

2. Hypothesis: Ultrasonic Frequencies May Cause Hearing Loss

3. Hypothesis: Ultrasonic Frequencies May Cause Hearing Loss

4. What Hazard is in Hazard, Kentucky? (HCOP Conference

5. Need Specific Info On Specific Drs.

6. INFO: Diamond-Blackfan Anemia (DBA) email support group

7. Chlorhexidine applied to Dentinal surface prior to DBA

8. I have a rather hopeless condition it seems.

9. Brain Locus theory-- DNA molecule rather than atom

10. more news that favors Manufacturing-Site rather than the Prusiner model


 
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software