archaeology mesoamerican, LATE UPDATE-- Ed Conrad Guest on Larry King Live Friday -- Note to Affiliates

LATE UPDATE-- Ed Conrad Guest on Larry King Live Friday -- Note to Affiliates

Author	Message
Ed Conr #1 / 9	LATE UPDATE-- Ed Conrad Guest on Larry King Live Friday -- Note to Affiliates Quote: >< >< >> ========================================== >> ========================================== >> ========================================== >< >PC51404cncn-//:-AUG5.2003xp3112-9:05dst >CNN/ATLANTA/LateUpdate/cnn232/rsp >< >< >> ATTENTION: ALL CNN AFFILIATES >> CONFIDENTIAL MEMO >< >> Late Programing Change >> Guests -- Larry King Live >> Friday, 9 p.m., Aug. 15, 2003 >< >Due to circumstances beyond our control, Ed Conrad >will NOT appear on Larry King Live at 9 p.m. Friday, >Aug. 15, 2003. >< >Nor at any time in the foreseeable future. >< >As you know, our programming preferences are over-the-hill >actresses, politicians who speak out of both sides of their mouth, >serial killers, con artists, bag-of-wind preachers and, of course, >the occasional tyrant or two. >< >We, too, cannot deal with Ed Conrad's substantial physical >evidence that Man is as Old as Coal or that the REAL YOU >never spends as much as five minutes beneath your tombstone. >< >I repeat: This correspondence must be kept strictly confidential. >For God's sake, don't breathe a word to the press. >< >Ralston S. Parkwood >Executive Programming Director >< >> CNN Tower/Atlanta >< >cc: Mr. Ted Turner > Larry >747P/jks2:RSP/Judy -- 8-7-03/ >(copy to Judy's file) >> ============================================= >> ============================================= >> ============================================= >< >< > ===== SINCERE APOLOGY TO OUR AFFILIATES ===== < This is Judy, Mr. Parkwood's personal secretary, to let you know we've had a problem but it is really very, very minor. < Mr. Parkwood had instructed me yesterday to e-mail his confidential memo about Ed Conrad's non-appearance on "Larry King Live" to all of our affiliates. < I did so right after lunch but I guess those three-four martinis -- to celebrate Henrietta's birthday -- made me a bit tipsy. So I must've accidentally pulled up the newsgroups' addresses instead of the one for the affiliates and inadvertently sent the memo to maybe 50-60 newsgroups. < It was really an innocent mistake that often happens in a big office like this. I doubt that any harm has been done. Besides, I doubt if anyone in the newsgroups will even bother to read it. < Judy < - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Quote: >< >< >< >< >< >< > WHAT 'LARRY KING LIVE,' TV NEWS SHOWS AND > MAJOR NEWSPAPERS DON'T WANT YOU TO SEE >< >< >Here are just a few of the many mindboggling specimens >of petrified human and animal bones, teeth and even soft organs >that were discovered between anthracite veins in NE Pennsylvania. >It means humans and large land animals -- including dinosaurs >and giant prehistoric scorpions -- existed on earth a minimum >of 280 million years ago. >Yep, it's the very same strata where the Scientific Establishment >has long insisted that the remains of neither man nor large land >animals could ever be found. >The Scientific Establishment is in adamant denial and therefore >says they're rocks and concreteions even though they are well >aware that all sort of state-of-the-art scientific testing had been >done on these specimens -- ALL with positive results. >Testing has included microscopic identification of Haversian canals >(miniscule circles, the telltale sign of bone); CATscans; infrared >scans; calculus analysis by crystallography (performed at American >Medical Laboratories in Chantilly, Va.); SEM (scanning electronic >microscopy); PLUS the favorable endor{filter}t of both Wilton M. >Krogman, one of the world's foremost authorities on human anatomy, >and world famous anthropologist/anatomist Raymond Dart, as well >as the written confirmation of B-O-N-E by Jeremy Dahl, then a leading >bone expert at Yerkes Regional Primate Research Center in Atlanta, Ga. >These petrified bones, teeth and even soft organs, as can be >expected, have the Scientific Establishment shaking in its boots. >It also has the major TV network news shows -- like Larry King Live -- >protecting their ass as they continue to ignore the physical >evidence as they play stooge to decades of deceit, deception, >collusion and {filter}, the only thing that has kept the theory of >the evolution of man alive (but now has it on its death bed).. >In descending order, the incredible petrifiedfossils include a human >calvarium (a portion of a skull with the eye sockets broken >off which was identified by world famous bone expert Wilton >Krogman, author of "The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine"); >a human femur still embedded in slate; a gall bladder (a CATscan hd >revealed it contains a gall stone); a tibia; a complete >human skull embedded in a boulder; a human lung; one >hemisphere of a human brain; a human mandible (frontal jaw >bone); a human mandible (jaw bone); a giant tooth; a portion >of a dinosaur foot still embedded in slate; a fetus; another fetus >embedded in slate; three views of a portion of a giant prehistoric >scorpion; and, finally, a handcarved piece of wood that has >turned to anthracite, undoubtedly originally used as part of a tool >or a weapon. > http://www.*.com/ > http://www..com/ > http://www..com/ > http://www..com/ > http://www..com/ > http://www..com/ > http://www..com/ > http://www..com/ > http://www..com/ > http://www..com/ > http://www..com/ > http://www..com/ > http://www..com/ > http://www..com/ > http://www..com/ > http://www..com/ > http://www..com/ > http://www..com/ > http://www..com/ > Ed Conrad >> http://www.*.com/ >Man Definitely as Old as Coal
Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:52:18 GMT

David Sienkiewi #2 / 9	LATE UPDATE-- Ed Conrad Guest on Larry King Live Friday -- Note to Affiliates Quote: > >< > >> ========================================== > >> ========================================== > >> ========================================== > >< > >PC51404cncn-//:-AUG5.2003xp3112-9:05dst > >CNN/ATLANTA/LateUpdate/cnn232/rsp > >< > >< > >> ATTENTION: ALL CNN AFFILIATES > >> CONFIDENTIAL MEMO < > >> Late Programing Change > >> Guests -- Larry King Live > >> Friday, 9 p.m., Aug. 15, 2003 > >< > >Due to circumstances beyond our control, Ed Conrad > >will NOT appear on Larry King Live at 9 p.m. Friday, > >Aug. 15, 2003. > >< > >Nor at any time in the foreseeable future. < snip rest > That's true, Ed. Everything you've put in this newsgroup about this has been a complete fabrication on your part. Quote: > > WHAT 'LARRY KING LIVE,' TV NEWS SHOWS AND > > MAJOR NEWSPAPERS DON'T WANT YOU TO SEE Now, now, Ed. If the people at CNN and Larry King's show thought for a second that you actually had something, they'd have you on in a heartbeat. We all know that. But if even trash TV won't talk to you, Ed, that tells us something, doesn't it? Quote: > >Here are just a few of the many mindboggling specimens > >of petrified human and animal bones, teeth and even soft organs > >that were discovered between anthracite veins in NE Pennsylvania. No, Ed, what they are are rocks and concretions. Not one of them is a specimen of animal remains. Quote: > >It means humans and large land animals -- including dinosaurs > >and giant prehistoric scorpions -- existed on earth a minimum > >of 280 million years ago. We know about large scorpions, but the rest is not true. Quote: > >Yep, it's the very same strata where the Scientific Establishment > >has long insisted that the remains of neither man nor large land > >animals could ever be found. And the "scientific establishment" is right. Quote: > >The Scientific Establishment is in adamant denial and therefore > >says they're rocks and concreteions even though they are well > >aware that all sort of state-of-the-art scientific testing had been > >done on these specimens -- ALL with positive results. No, Ed, this is another lie. Your claims to "state-of-the-art scientific testing" have been exposed as deliberate lies and misrepresentations. Quote: > >Testing has included microscopic identification of Haversian canals > >(miniscule circles, the telltale sign of bone); CATscans; infrared > >scans; calculus analysis by crystallography (performed at American > >Medical Laboratories in Chantilly, Va.); SEM (scanning electronic > >microscopy); PLUS the favorable endor{filter}t of both Wilton M. > >Krogman, one of the world's foremost authorities on human anatomy, > >and world famous anthropologist/anatomist Raymond Dart, as well > >as the written confirmation of B-O-N-E by Jeremy Dahl, then a leading > >bone expert at Yerkes Regional Primate Research Center in Atlanta, Ga. All false, Ed, as has been explained many times. Quote: > >These petrified bones, teeth and even soft organs, as can be > >expected, have the Scientific Establishment shaking in its boots. No, Ed, the only one shaking in his boots is YOU. You thought you'd be able to get away with these lies in Usenet, but some of us have been exposing you. Quote: > >It also has the major TV network news shows -- like Larry King Live -- > >protecting their ass as they continue to ignore the physical > >evidence as they play stooge to decades of deceit, deception, > >collusion and {filter}, the only thing that has kept the theory of > >the evolution of man alive (but now has it on its death bed).. No, Ed, that's just how you'd like to represent things in light of your own delusions. Quote: > >In descending order, the incredible petrifiedfossils include a human > >calvarium (a portion of a skull with the eye sockets broken > >off which was identified by world famous bone expert Wilton > >Krogman, author of "The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine"); Krogman thought you were "something of a lunatic," Ed. He didn't IDENTIFY anything. < snip remainder > Ed, every one of these specimens has been falsified or at least called into serious question. ONE might be a fossil, but it is not a fossil of what you claim it to be - it is simply a prehistoric plant form. The simple fact, Ed, is that you're a liar. That's what it really boils down to; and for whatever reason, you continue to lie. So I'll continue to expose you.
Wed, 25 Jan 2006 03:53:57 GMT

Ed Conr #3 / 9	LATE UPDATE-- Ed Conrad Guest on Larry King Live Friday -- Note to Affiliates Quote: >> >< >> >> ========================================== >> >> ========================================== >> >> ========================================== >> >< >> >PC51404cncn-//:-AUG5.2003xp3112-9:05dst >> >CNN/ATLANTA/LateUpdate/cnn232/rsp >> >< >> >< >> >> ATTENTION: ALL CNN AFFILIATES >> >> CONFIDENTIAL MEMO < >> >> Late Programing Change >> >> Guests -- Larry King Live >> >> Friday, 9 p.m., Aug. 15, 2003 >> >< >> >Due to circumstances beyond our control, Ed Conrad >> >will NOT appear on Larry King Live at 9 p.m. Friday, >> >Aug. 15, 2003. >> >< >> >Nor at any time in the foreseeable future. >< snip rest > >That's true, Ed. Everything you've put in this newsgroup about this >has been a complete fabrication on your part. >> > WHAT 'LARRY KING LIVE,' TV NEWS SHOWS AND >> > MAJOR NEWSPAPERS DON'T WANT YOU TO SEE >Now, now, Ed. If the people at CNN and Larry King's show thought for >a second that you actually had something, they'd have you on in a >heartbeat. >We all know that. >But if even trash TV won't talk to you, Ed, that tells us something, >doesn't it? >> >Here are just a few of the many mindboggling specimens >> >of petrified human and animal bones, teeth and even soft organs >> >that were discovered between anthracite veins in NE Pennsylvania. >No, Ed, what they are are rocks and concretions. Not one of them is a >specimen of animal remains. >> >It means humans and large land animals -- including dinosaurs >> >and giant prehistoric scorpions -- existed on earth a minimum >> >of 280 million years ago. >We know about large scorpions, but the rest is not true. >> >Yep, it's the very same strata where the Scientific Establishment >> >has long insisted that the remains of neither man nor large land >> >animals could ever be found. >And the "scientific establishment" is right. >> >The Scientific Establishment is in adamant denial and therefore >> >says they're rocks and concreteions even though they are well >> >aware that all sort of state-of-the-art scientific testing had been >> >done on these specimens -- ALL with positive results. >No, Ed, this is another lie. Your claims to "state-of-the-art >scientific testing" have been exposed as deliberate lies and >misrepresentations. >> >Testing has included microscopic identification of Haversian canals >> >(miniscule circles, the telltale sign of bone); CATscans; infrared >> >scans; calculus analysis by crystallography (performed at American >> >Medical Laboratories in Chantilly, Va.); SEM (scanning electronic >> >microscopy); PLUS the favorable endor{filter}t of both Wilton M. >> >Krogman, one of the world's foremost authorities on human anatomy, >> >and world famous anthropologist/anatomist Raymond Dart, as well >> >as the written confirmation of B-O-N-E by Jeremy Dahl, then a leading >> >bone expert at Yerkes Regional Primate Research Center in Atlanta, Ga. >All false, Ed, as has been explained many times. >> >These petrified bones, teeth and even soft organs, as can be >> >expected, have the Scientific Establishment shaking in its boots. >No, Ed, the only one shaking in his boots is YOU. >You thought you'd be able to get away with these lies in Usenet, but >some of us have been exposing you. >> >It also has the major TV network news shows -- like Larry King Live -- >> >protecting their ass as they continue to ignore the physical >> >evidence as they play stooge to decades of deceit, deception, >> >collusion and {filter}, the only thing that has kept the theory of >> >the evolution of man alive (but now has it on its death bed).. >No, Ed, that's just how you'd like to represent things in light of >your own delusions. >> >In descending order, the incredible petrifiedfossils include a human >> >calvarium (a portion of a skull with the eye sockets broken >> >off which was identified by world famous bone expert Wilton >> >Krogman, author of "The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine"); >Krogman thought you were "something of a lunatic," Ed. He didn't >IDENTIFY anything. >< snip remainder > >Ed, every one of these specimens has been falsified or at least called >into serious question. ONE might be a fossil, but it is not a fossil >of what you claim it to be - it is simply a prehistoric plant form. >The simple fact, Ed, is that you're a liar. That's what it really >boils down to; and for whatever reason, you continue to lie. >So I'll continue to expose you. The feeling is mutual... < Quote: > =============================================== > UNDERSTANDING THE{filter} -- i.e. David Sitenkiewicz > ================================================ I don't think this question is really as complicated as it sounds. You see, Attorney David Sienkiewicz loves money. Hell, he has even admitted on talk.origins that he's worth several million dollars (although I don't know for sure whether he was bragging or complaining). In any event, Attorney Sienkiewicz LOVES money. And, because of it, he has become a {filter} for money, sort of like Judas Iscariot. Money, Money, Money, Money, Money. That's why, now in semi-retirement, Attorney Sienkiewicz has latched on to a $uper-paying job as a hit man for the Scientirfic Establishment (Ain't that just great? Your tax dollars are funding his effort!.) Anyway, his job nowadays is to spend 18 hours at his computer attempting -- rather unsuccessfully, in my case -- defending factless, facetious theories with a character assassination campaign against me that's without reproach against one person in the entire history of the Internet, and doubtfully will ever be topped. Attorney Sienkiewicz is not acting like a moron, an imbecile, a fool, an a--hole because of his desire for truth. I'm sure he couldn't care less. You see, he damn well knows which $ide his bread is buttered on. It is a shame, really, that he keeps making an a--hole of himself -- with all his education -- but there is no question he has, and he keeps doing it. HIS CHARGES AGAINST ME ON EACH AND EVERY POINT ARE TOTALLY UNFOUNDED. Attorney Sienkiewicz has never examined ANY of the petrified boens, teeth or soft organs -- some human -- discovered between anthraciote veins. So he has NOTHING to based his unfounded charges on. He keeps screaming that the testing that was done was fraudulent but this is sheer crap. Poor Attorney Sienkiewicz' despicable campaign of character assassination -- visting countless news groups to attack my integrity -- is a sad, sad tale in this David vs. Goliath battle that I assure you I am going to win. You'd think at least one lawyer out there would post one message and inform him that his actions are an insult to the legal profession. Last but not least, I salute the person who wrote the header to discuss Attorney David Sienkiewicz and the fool he has been making out of himself. At least there's one person with some intestinal fortitude. Had he not pursed a legal career, I'm sure Attorney Sienkiewicz could've made a pile of money elsewhere -- like in a traveling carnival. He'd have been a hit of the show, and here's a picture to prove it. Quote: > http://www.*.com/ Ed Conrad Quote: > http://www.*.com/ Man as Old as Coal and Proof of Life After Death
Wed, 25 Jan 2006 05:27:56 GMT

David Sienkiewi #4 / 9	LATE UPDATE-- Ed Conrad Guest on Larry King Live Friday -- Note to Affiliates Quote: > >> >< > >> >> ========================================== > >> >> ========================================== > >> >> ========================================== > >> >< > >> >PC51404cncn-//:-AUG5.2003xp3112-9:05dst > >> >CNN/ATLANTA/LateUpdate/cnn232/rsp > >> >< > >> >< > >> >> ATTENTION: ALL CNN AFFILIATES > >> >> CONFIDENTIAL MEMO < > >> >> Late Programing Change > >> >> Guests -- Larry King Live > >> >> Friday, 9 p.m., Aug. 15, 2003 > >> >< > >> >Due to circumstances beyond our control, Ed Conrad > >> >will NOT appear on Larry King Live at 9 p.m. Friday, > >> >Aug. 15, 2003. > >> >< > >> >Nor at any time in the foreseeable future. > >< snip rest > > >That's true, Ed. Everything you've put in this newsgroup about this > >has been a complete fabrication on your part. > >> > WHAT 'LARRY KING LIVE,' TV NEWS SHOWS AND > >> > MAJOR NEWSPAPERS DON'T WANT YOU TO SEE > >Now, now, Ed. If the people at CNN and Larry King's show thought for > >a second that you actually had something, they'd have you on in a > >heartbeat. > >We all know that. > >But if even trash TV won't talk to you, Ed, that tells us something, > >doesn't it? > >> >Here are just a few of the many mindboggling specimens > >> >of petrified human and animal bones, teeth and even soft organs > >> >that were discovered between anthracite veins in NE Pennsylvania. > >No, Ed, what they are are rocks and concretions. Not one of them is a > >specimen of animal remains. > >> >It means humans and large land animals -- including dinosaurs > >> >and giant prehistoric scorpions -- existed on earth a minimum > >> >of 280 million years ago. > >We know about large scorpions, but the rest is not true. > >> >Yep, it's the very same strata where the Scientific Establishment > >> >has long insisted that the remains of neither man nor large land > >> >animals could ever be found. > >And the "scientific establishment" is right. > >> >The Scientific Establishment is in adamant denial and therefore > >> >says they're rocks and concreteions even though they are well > >> >aware that all sort of state-of-the-art scientific testing had been > >> >done on these specimens -- ALL with positive results. > >No, Ed, this is another lie. Your claims to "state-of-the-art > >scientific testing" have been exposed as deliberate lies and > >misrepresentations. > >> >Testing has included microscopic identification of Haversian canals > >> >(miniscule circles, the telltale sign of bone); CATscans; infrared > >> >scans; calculus analysis by crystallography (performed at American > >> >Medical Laboratories in Chantilly, Va.); SEM (scanning electronic > >> >microscopy); PLUS the favorable endor{filter}t of both Wilton M. > >> >Krogman, one of the world's foremost authorities on human anatomy, > >> >and world famous anthropologist/anatomist Raymond Dart, as well > >> >as the written confirmation of B-O-N-E by Jeremy Dahl, then a leading > >> >bone expert at Yerkes Regional Primate Research Center in Atlanta, Ga. > >All false, Ed, as has been explained many times. > >> >These petrified bones, teeth and even soft organs, as can be > >> >expected, have the Scientific Establishment shaking in its boots. > >No, Ed, the only one shaking in his boots is YOU. > >You thought you'd be able to get away with these lies in Usenet, but > >some of us have been exposing you. > >> >It also has the major TV network news shows -- like Larry King Live -- > >> >protecting their ass as they continue to ignore the physical > >> >evidence as they play stooge to decades of deceit, deception, > >> >collusion and {filter}, the only thing that has kept the theory of > >> >the evolution of man alive (but now has it on its death bed).. > >No, Ed, that's just how you'd like to represent things in light of > >your own delusions. > >> >In descending order, the incredible petrifiedfossils include a human > >> >calvarium (a portion of a skull with the eye sockets broken > >> >off which was identified by world famous bone expert Wilton > >> >Krogman, author of "The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine"); > >Krogman thought you were "something of a lunatic," Ed. He didn't > >IDENTIFY anything. > >< snip remainder > > >Ed, every one of these specimens has been falsified or at least called > >into serious question. ONE might be a fossil, but it is not a fossil > >of what you claim it to be - it is simply a prehistoric plant form. > >The simple fact, Ed, is that you're a liar. That's what it really > >boils down to; and for whatever reason, you continue to lie. > >So I'll continue to expose you. > The feeling is mutual... I'm not interested in feelings, Ed. I'm interested in facts. You don't have any facts. Quote: > > =============================================== > > UNDERSTANDING THE{filter} -- i.e. David Sitenkiewicz > > ================================================ Yes, I see that you are widely reposting this bit of nonsense. Your comment above would imply that this is an expose of some kind, but it is, in fact a load of lies. Ed, I answered this article several times. One of those answers may be found here: http://www.**.com/ :david.sienkiewicz%40attbi.co... Now, Ed, to cut to the chase: Where is your evidence that I work for ANYONE, let alone the "scientific establishment?" The fact is that you don't have any evidence, do you? You made it up. You lied. You did that because you could not answer any of the valid criticisms that I have levelled at your claims or your "evidence." You can't deal with the specific issues, so you CREATED another issue. Your problem, Ed, is that you are not only a liar, you are a BAD liar; and as soon as anyone challenges your lies with specific demands for evidence, you either run away, disappear for a time, post bad poetry, or repost past articles. You don't have any evidence for anything; but you continue to try to foist your pathetic fraud on the unsuspecting and the gullible. You're a fraud, Ed, and your "fossils" are a hoax. You are just a poor, pathetic wretch with a failed journalistic career who longs for the attention your deficient skills and intellect have denied you. You wanted that "big story" at a time when there were many such stories; but even the NATIONAL ENQUIRER rejected you. But the biggest rejection came from science, because science has the power to expose you; and science HAS exposed you. So you've embarked on this years-long campaign of ridicule (why isn't it the "argument of the mob" when YOU do it, hyporitical Ed?), character assassination, lies and paranoid rantings of {filter}. You've done this because you haven't he guts that it takes to accept responsibility or error. Ed, you can spam the newsgroups with your repost of "understanding the {filter*}" if you wish; and you and I both know that Google won't allow a response to every one of them because they limit the number of posts within a certain time period. That's okay, I don't need to respond to each one - just to one in each newsgroup. And that's how I'll do it. There are no more free rides for you and your ilk in Usenet, Ed. The last bastion of hope that you had to foist your lies on an unsuspecting public is yet another failure for you. You have no one to blame but yourself. < snip >
Wed, 25 Jan 2006 09:28:49 GMT

Ed Conr #5 / 9	LATE UPDATE-- Ed Conrad Guest on Larry King Live Friday -- Note to Affiliates Quote: >> >> >< >> >> >> ========================================== >> >> >> ========================================== >> >> >> ========================================== >> >> >< >> >> >PC51404cncn-//:-AUG5.2003xp3112-9:05dst >> >> >CNN/ATLANTA/LateUpdate/cnn232/rsp >> >> >< >> >> >< >> >> >> ATTENTION: ALL CNN AFFILIATES >> >> >> CONFIDENTIAL MEMO < >> >> >> Late Programing Change >> >> >> Guests -- Larry King Live >> >> >> Friday, 9 p.m., Aug. 15, 2003 >> >> >< >> >> >Due to circumstances beyond our control, Ed Conrad >> >> >will NOT appear on Larry King Live at 9 p.m. Friday, >> >> >Aug. 15, 2003. >> >> >< >> >> >Nor at any time in the foreseeable future. >> >< snip rest > >> >That's true, Ed. Everything you've put in this newsgroup about this >> >has been a complete fabrication on your part. >> >> > WHAT 'LARRY KING LIVE,' TV NEWS SHOWS AND >> >> > MAJOR NEWSPAPERS DON'T WANT YOU TO SEE >> >Now, now, Ed. If the people at CNN and Larry King's show thought for >> >a second that you actually had something, they'd have you on in a >> >heartbeat. >> >We all know that. >> >But if even trash TV won't talk to you, Ed, that tells us something, >> >doesn't it? >> >> >Here are just a few of the many mindboggling specimens >> >> >of petrified human and animal bones, teeth and even soft organs >> >> >that were discovered between anthracite veins in NE Pennsylvania. >> >No, Ed, what they are are rocks and concretions. Not one of them is a >> >specimen of animal remains. >> >> >It means humans and large land animals -- including dinosaurs >> >> >and giant prehistoric scorpions -- existed on earth a minimum >> >> >of 280 million years ago. >> >We know about large scorpions, but the rest is not true. >> >> >Yep, it's the very same strata where the Scientific Establishment >> >> >has long insisted that the remains of neither man nor large land >> >> >animals could ever be found. >> >And the "scientific establishment" is right. >> >> >The Scientific Establishment is in adamant denial and therefore >> >> >says they're rocks and concreteions even though they are well >> >> >aware that all sort of state-of-the-art scientific testing had been >> >> >done on these specimens -- ALL with positive results. >> >No, Ed, this is another lie. Your claims to "state-of-the-art >> >scientific testing" have been exposed as deliberate lies and >> >misrepresentations. >> >> >Testing has included microscopic identification of Haversian canals >> >> >(miniscule circles, the telltale sign of bone); CATscans; infrared >> >> >scans; calculus analysis by crystallography (performed at American >> >> >Medical Laboratories in Chantilly, Va.); SEM (scanning electronic >> >> >microscopy); PLUS the favorable endor{filter}t of both Wilton M. >> >> >Krogman, one of the world's foremost authorities on human anatomy, >> >> >and world famous anthropologist/anatomist Raymond Dart, as well >> >> >as the written confirmation of B-O-N-E by Jeremy Dahl, then a leading >> >> >bone expert at Yerkes Regional Primate Research Center in Atlanta, Ga. >> >All false, Ed, as has been explained many times. >> >> >These petrified bones, teeth and even soft organs, as can be >> >> >expected, have the Scientific Establishment shaking in its boots. >> >No, Ed, the only one shaking in his boots is YOU. >> >You thought you'd be able to get away with these lies in Usenet, but >> >some of us have been exposing you. >> >> >It also has the major TV network news shows -- like Larry King Live -- >> >> >protecting their ass as they continue to ignore the physical >> >> >evidence as they play stooge to decades of deceit, deception, >> >> >collusion and {filter}, the only thing that has kept the theory of >> >> >the evolution of man alive (but now has it on its death bed).. >> >No, Ed, that's just how you'd like to represent things in light of >> >your own delusions. >> >> >In descending order, the incredible petrifiedfossils include a human >> >> >calvarium (a portion of a skull with the eye sockets broken >> >> >off which was identified by world famous bone expert Wilton >> >> >Krogman, author of "The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine"); >> >Krogman thought you were "something of a lunatic," Ed. He didn't >> >IDENTIFY anything. >> >< snip remainder > >> >Ed, every one of these specimens has been falsified or at least called >> >into serious question. ONE might be a fossil, but it is not a fossil >> >of what you claim it to be - it is simply a prehistoric plant form. >> >The simple fact, Ed, is that you're a liar. That's what it really >> >boils down to; and for whatever reason, you continue to lie. >> >So I'll continue to expose you. >> The feeling is mutual... >I'm not interested in feelings, Ed. I'm interested in facts. >You don't have any facts. >> > =============================================== >> > UNDERSTANDING THE{filter} -- i.e. David Sitenkiewicz >> > ================================================ >Yes, I see that you are widely reposting this bit of nonsense. >Your comment above would imply that this is an expose of some kind, >but it is, in fact a load of lies. >Ed, I answered this article several times. One of those answers may >be found here: > http://www.**.com/ :david.sienkiewicz%40attbi.co... >Now, Ed, to cut to the chase: Where is your evidence that I work for >ANYONE, let alone the "scientific establishment?" >The fact is that you don't have any evidence, do you? >You made it up. >You lied. >You did that because you could not answer any of the valid criticisms >that I have levelled at your claims or your "evidence." You can't >deal with the specific issues, so you CREATED another issue. >Your problem, Ed, is that you are not only a liar, you are a BAD liar; >and as soon as anyone challenges your lies with specific demands for >evidence, you either run away, disappear for a time, post bad poetry, >or repost past articles. >You don't have any evidence for anything; but you continue to try to >foist your pathetic fraud on the unsuspecting and the gullible. >You're a fraud, Ed, and your "fossils" are a hoax. You are just a >poor, pathetic wretch with a failed journalistic career who longs for >the attention your deficient skills and intellect have denied you. >You wanted that "big story" at a time when there were many such >stories; but even the NATIONAL ENQUIRER rejected you. >But the biggest rejection came from science, because science has the >power to expose you; and science HAS exposed you. >So you've embarked on this years-long campaign of ridicule (why isn't >it the "argument of the mob" when YOU do it, hyporitical Ed?), >character assassination, lies and paranoid rantings of {filter}. >You've done this because you haven't he guts that it takes to accept >responsibility or error. >Ed, you can spam the newsgroups with your repost of "understanding the >anus" if you wish; and you and I both know that Google won't allow a >response to every one of them because they limit the number of posts >within a certain time period. >That's okay, I don't need to respond to each one - just to one in each >newsgroup. And that's how I'll do it. >There are no more free rides for you and your ilk in Usenet, Ed. The >last bastion of hope that you had to foist your lies on an >unsuspecting public is yet another failure for you. >You have no one to blame but yourself. >< snip > > =============================================== > UNDERSTANDING THE{filter} -- i.e. David Sitenkiewicz > ================================================ I don't think this question is really as complicated as it sounds. You see, Attorney David Sienkiewicz loves money. Hell, he has even admitted on talk.origins that he's worth several million dollars (although I don't know for sure whether he was bragging or complaining). In any event, Attorney Sienkiewicz LOVES money. And, because of it, he has become a {filter} for money, sort of like Judas Iscariot. Money, Money, Money, Money, Money. That's why, now in semi-retirement, Attorney Sienkiewicz has latched on to a $uper-paying job as a hit man for the Scientirfic Establishment. (Ain't that just great, your tax dollars are funding his effort!.) Anyway, his job nowadays is to spend 18 hours at his computer attempting -- rather unsuccessfully, in my case -- defending factless, facetious theories with a character assassination campaign against me that is without reproach against one person in the entire history of the Internet, and doubtfully will ever be topped. Attorney Sienkiewicz is not acting like a moron, an imbecile, a fool, an a--hole because of his desire for truth. I'm sure he couldn't care less. You see, he damn well knows which $ide his bread is buttered on. It is a shame, really, that he keeps making an a--hole of himself -- with all his education -- but there is no question he has, and he keeps doing it. HIS CHARGES AGAINST ME ON EACH AND EVERY POINT ARE TOTALLY UNFOUNDED. Attorney Sienkiewicz has never examined ANY of the petrified boens, teeth or soft organs -- some human -- discovered between anthraciote veins. So he has NOTHING to based his unfounded charges on. He keeps screaming that the testing that ... read more »*
Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:13:49 GMT

Ed Conr #6 / 9	LATE UPDATE-- Ed Conrad Guest on Larry King Live Friday -- Note to Affiliates Quote: >> >> >< >> >> >> ========================================== >> >> >> ========================================== >> >> >> ========================================== >> >> >< >> >> >PC51404cncn-//:-AUG5.2003xp3112-9:05dst >> >> >CNN/ATLANTA/LateUpdate/cnn232/rsp >> >> >< >> >> >< >> >> >> ATTENTION: ALL CNN AFFILIATES >> >> >> CONFIDENTIAL MEMO < >> >> >> Late Programing Change >> >> >> Guests -- Larry King Live >> >> >> Friday, 9 p.m., Aug. 15, 2003 >> >> >< >> >> >Due to circumstances beyond our control, Ed Conrad >> >> >will NOT appear on Larry King Live at 9 p.m. Friday, >> >> >Aug. 15, 2003. >> >> >< >> >> >Nor at any time in the foreseeable future. >> >< snip rest > >> >That's true, Ed. Everything you've put in this newsgroup about this >> >has been a complete fabrication on your part. >> >> > WHAT 'LARRY KING LIVE,' TV NEWS SHOWS AND >> >> > MAJOR NEWSPAPERS DON'T WANT YOU TO SEE >> >Now, now, Ed. If the people at CNN and Larry King's show thought for >> >a second that you actually had something, they'd have you on in a >> >heartbeat. >> >We all know that. >> >But if even trash TV won't talk to you, Ed, that tells us something, >> >doesn't it? >> >> >Here are just a few of the many mindboggling specimens >> >> >of petrified human and animal bones, teeth and even soft organs >> >> >that were discovered between anthracite veins in NE Pennsylvania. >> >No, Ed, what they are are rocks and concretions. Not one of them is a >> >specimen of animal remains. >> >> >It means humans and large land animals -- including dinosaurs >> >> >and giant prehistoric scorpions -- existed on earth a minimum >> >> >of 280 million years ago. >> >We know about large scorpions, but the rest is not true. >> >> >Yep, it's the very same strata where the Scientific Establishment >> >> >has long insisted that the remains of neither man nor large land >> >> >animals could ever be found. >> >And the "scientific establishment" is right. >> >> >The Scientific Establishment is in adamant denial and therefore >> >> >says they're rocks and concreteions even though they are well >> >> >aware that all sort of state-of-the-art scientific testing had been >> >> >done on these specimens -- ALL with positive results. >> >No, Ed, this is another lie. Your claims to "state-of-the-art >> >scientific testing" have been exposed as deliberate lies and >> >misrepresentations. >> >> >Testing has included microscopic identification of Haversian canals >> >> >(miniscule circles, the telltale sign of bone); CATscans; infrared >> >> >scans; calculus analysis by crystallography (performed at American >> >> >Medical Laboratories in Chantilly, Va.); SEM (scanning electronic >> >> >microscopy); PLUS the favorable endor{filter}t of both Wilton M. >> >> >Krogman, one of the world's foremost authorities on human anatomy, >> >> >and world famous anthropologist/anatomist Raymond Dart, as well >> >> >as the written confirmation of B-O-N-E by Jeremy Dahl, then a leading >> >> >bone expert at Yerkes Regional Primate Research Center in Atlanta, Ga. >> >All false, Ed, as has been explained many times. >> >> >These petrified bones, teeth and even soft organs, as can be >> >> >expected, have the Scientific Establishment shaking in its boots. >> >No, Ed, the only one shaking in his boots is YOU. >> >You thought you'd be able to get away with these lies in Usenet, but >> >some of us have been exposing you. >> >> >It also has the major TV network news shows -- like Larry King Live -- >> >> >protecting their ass as they continue to ignore the physical >> >> >evidence as they play stooge to decades of deceit, deception, >> >> >collusion and {filter}, the only thing that has kept the theory of >> >> >the evolution of man alive (but now has it on its death bed).. >> >No, Ed, that's just how you'd like to represent things in light of >> >your own delusions. >> >> >In descending order, the incredible petrifiedfossils include a human >> >> >calvarium (a portion of a skull with the eye sockets broken >> >> >off which was identified by world famous bone expert Wilton >> >> >Krogman, author of "The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine"); >> >Krogman thought you were "something of a lunatic," Ed. He didn't >> >IDENTIFY anything. >> >< snip remainder > >> >Ed, every one of these specimens has been falsified or at least called >> >into serious question. ONE might be a fossil, but it is not a fossil >> >of what you claim it to be - it is simply a prehistoric plant form. >> >The simple fact, Ed, is that you're a liar. That's what it really >> >boils down to; and for whatever reason, you continue to lie. >> >So I'll continue to expose you. >> The feeling is mutual... >I'm not interested in feelings, Ed. I'm interested in facts. >You don't have any facts. >> > =============================================== >> > UNDERSTANDING THE{filter} -- i.e. David Sitenkiewicz >> > ================================================ >Yes, I see that you are widely reposting this bit of nonsense. >Your comment above would imply that this is an expose of some kind, >but it is, in fact a load of lies. >Ed, I answered this article several times. One of those answers may >be found here: > http://www.**.com/ :david.sienkiewicz%40attbi.co... >Now, Ed, to cut to the chase: Where is your evidence that I work for >ANYONE, let alone the "scientific establishment?" >The fact is that you don't have any evidence, do you? >You made it up. >You lied. >You did that because you could not answer any of the valid criticisms >that I have levelled at your claims or your "evidence." You can't >deal with the specific issues, so you CREATED another issue. >Your problem, Ed, is that you are not only a liar, you are a BAD liar; >and as soon as anyone challenges your lies with specific demands for >evidence, you either run away, disappear for a time, post bad poetry, >or repost past articles. >You don't have any evidence for anything; but you continue to try to >foist your pathetic fraud on the unsuspecting and the gullible. >You're a fraud, Ed, and your "fossils" are a hoax. You are just a >poor, pathetic wretch with a failed journalistic career who longs for >the attention your deficient skills and intellect have denied you. >You wanted that "big story" at a time when there were many such >stories; but even the NATIONAL ENQUIRER rejected you. >But the biggest rejection came from science, because science has the >power to expose you; and science HAS exposed you. >So you've embarked on this years-long campaign of ridicule (why isn't >it the "argument of the mob" when YOU do it, hyporitical Ed?), >character assassination, lies and paranoid rantings of {filter}. >You've done this because you haven't he guts that it takes to accept >responsibility or error. >Ed, you can spam the newsgroups with your repost of "understanding the >anus" if you wish; and you and I both know that Google won't allow a >response to every one of them because they limit the number of posts >within a certain time period. >That's okay, I don't need to respond to each one - just to one in each >newsgroup. And that's how I'll do it. >There are no more free rides for you and your ilk in Usenet, Ed. The >last bastion of hope that you had to foist your lies on an >unsuspecting public is yet another failure for you. >You have no one to blame but yourself. >< snip > > =============================================== > UNDERSTANDING THE{filter} -- i.e. David Sitenkiewicz > ================================================ I don't think this question is really as complicated as it sounds. You see, Attorney David Sienkiewicz loves money. Hell, he has even admitted on talk.origins that he's worth several million dollars (although I don't know for sure whether he was bragging or complaining). In any event, Attorney Sienkiewicz LOVES money. And, because of it, he has become a {filter} for money, sort of like Judas Iscariot. Money, Money, Money, Money, Money. That's why, now in semi-retirement, Attorney Sienkiewicz has latched on to a $uper-paying job as a hit man for the Scientirfic Establishment. (Ain't that just great, your tax dollars are funding his effort!.) Anyway, his job nowadays is to spend 18 hours at his computer attempting -- rather unsuccessfully, in my case -- defending factless, facetious theories with a character assassination campaign against me that is without reproach against one person in the entire history of the Internet, and doubtfully will ever be topped. Attorney Sienkiewicz is not acting like a moron, an imbecile, a fool, an a--hole because of his desire for truth. I'm sure he couldn't care less. You see, he damn well knows which $ide his bread is buttered on. It is a shame, really, that he keeps making an a--hole of himself -- with all his education -- but there is no question he has, and he keeps doing it. HIS CHARGES AGAINST ME ON EACH AND EVERY POINT ARE TOTALLY UNFOUNDED. Attorney Sienkiewicz has never examined ANY of the petrified boens, teeth or soft organs -- some human -- discovered between anthraciote veins. So he has NOTHING to based his unfounded charges on. He keeps screaming that the testing that ... read more »*
Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:15:49 GMT

David Sienkiewi #7 / 9	LATE UPDATE-- Ed Conrad Guest on Larry King Live Friday -- Note to Affiliates Quote: > >> >> >< > >> >> >> ========================================== > >> >> >> ========================================== > >> >> >> ========================================== > >> >> >< > >> >> >PC51404cncn-//:-AUG5.2003xp3112-9:05dst > >> >> >CNN/ATLANTA/LateUpdate/cnn232/rsp > >> >> >< > >> >> >< > >> >> >> ATTENTION: ALL CNN AFFILIATES > >> >> >> CONFIDENTIAL MEMO < > >> >> >> Late Programing Change > >> >> >> Guests -- Larry King Live > >> >> >> Friday, 9 p.m., Aug. 15, 2003 > >> >> >< > >> >> >Due to circumstances beyond our control, Ed Conrad > >> >> >will NOT appear on Larry King Live at 9 p.m. Friday, > >> >> >Aug. 15, 2003. > >> >> >< > >> >> >Nor at any time in the foreseeable future. > >> >< snip rest > > >> >That's true, Ed. Everything you've put in this newsgroup about this > >> >has been a complete fabrication on your part. > >> >> > WHAT 'LARRY KING LIVE,' TV NEWS SHOWS AND > >> >> > MAJOR NEWSPAPERS DON'T WANT YOU TO SEE > >> >Now, now, Ed. If the people at CNN and Larry King's show thought for > >> >a second that you actually had something, they'd have you on in a > >> >heartbeat. > >> >We all know that. > >> >But if even trash TV won't talk to you, Ed, that tells us something, > >> >doesn't it? > >> >> >Here are just a few of the many mindboggling specimens > >> >> >of petrified human and animal bones, teeth and even soft organs > >> >> >that were discovered between anthracite veins in NE Pennsylvania. > >> >No, Ed, what they are are rocks and concretions. Not one of them is a > >> >specimen of animal remains. > >> >> >It means humans and large land animals -- including dinosaurs > >> >> >and giant prehistoric scorpions -- existed on earth a minimum > >> >> >of 280 million years ago. > >> >We know about large scorpions, but the rest is not true. > >> >> >Yep, it's the very same strata where the Scientific Establishment > >> >> >has long insisted that the remains of neither man nor large land > >> >> >animals could ever be found. > >> >And the "scientific establishment" is right. > >> >> >The Scientific Establishment is in adamant denial and therefore > >> >> >says they're rocks and concreteions even though they are well > >> >> >aware that all sort of state-of-the-art scientific testing had been > >> >> >done on these specimens -- ALL with positive results. > >> >No, Ed, this is another lie. Your claims to "state-of-the-art > >> >scientific testing" have been exposed as deliberate lies and > >> >misrepresentations. > >> >> >Testing has included microscopic identification of Haversian canals > >> >> >(miniscule circles, the telltale sign of bone); CATscans; infrared > >> >> >scans; calculus analysis by crystallography (performed at American > >> >> >Medical Laboratories in Chantilly, Va.); SEM (scanning electronic > >> >> >microscopy); PLUS the favorable endor{filter}t of both Wilton M. > >> >> >Krogman, one of the world's foremost authorities on human anatomy, > >> >> >and world famous anthropologist/anatomist Raymond Dart, as well > >> >> >as the written confirmation of B-O-N-E by Jeremy Dahl, then a leading > >> >> >bone expert at Yerkes Regional Primate Research Center in Atlanta, Ga. > >> >All false, Ed, as has been explained many times. > >> >> >These petrified bones, teeth and even soft organs, as can be > >> >> >expected, have the Scientific Establishment shaking in its boots. > >> >No, Ed, the only one shaking in his boots is YOU. > >> >You thought you'd be able to get away with these lies in Usenet, but > >> >some of us have been exposing you. > >> >> >It also has the major TV network news shows -- like Larry King Live -- > >> >> >protecting their ass as they continue to ignore the physical > >> >> >evidence as they play stooge to decades of deceit, deception, > >> >> >collusion and {filter}, the only thing that has kept the theory of > >> >> >the evolution of man alive (but now has it on its death bed).. > >> >No, Ed, that's just how you'd like to represent things in light of > >> >your own delusions. > >> >> >In descending order, the incredible petrifiedfossils include a human > >> >> >calvarium (a portion of a skull with the eye sockets broken > >> >> >off which was identified by world famous bone expert Wilton > >> >> >Krogman, author of "The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine"); > >> >Krogman thought you were "something of a lunatic," Ed. He didn't > >> >IDENTIFY anything. > >> >< snip remainder > > >> >Ed, every one of these specimens has been falsified or at least called > >> >into serious question. ONE might be a fossil, but it is not a fossil > >> >of what you claim it to be - it is simply a prehistoric plant form. > >> >The simple fact, Ed, is that you're a liar. That's what it really > >> >boils down to; and for whatever reason, you continue to lie. > >> >So I'll continue to expose you. > >> The feeling is mutual... > >I'm not interested in feelings, Ed. I'm interested in facts. > >You don't have any facts. > >> > =============================================== > >> > UNDERSTANDING THE{filter} -- i.e. David Sitenkiewicz > >> > ================================================ > >Yes, I see that you are widely reposting this bit of nonsense. > >Your comment above would imply that this is an expose of some kind, > >but it is, in fact a load of lies. > >Ed, I answered this article several times. One of those answers may > >be found here: > > http://www.**.com/ :david.sienkiewicz%40attbi.co... > >Now, Ed, to cut to the chase: Where is your evidence that I work for > >ANYONE, let alone the "scientific establishment?" > >The fact is that you don't have any evidence, do you? > >You made it up. > >You lied. > >You did that because you could not answer any of the valid criticisms > >that I have levelled at your claims or your "evidence." You can't > >deal with the specific issues, so you CREATED another issue. > >Your problem, Ed, is that you are not only a liar, you are a BAD liar; > >and as soon as anyone challenges your lies with specific demands for > >evidence, you either run away, disappear for a time, post bad poetry, > >or repost past articles. > >You don't have any evidence for anything; but you continue to try to > >foist your pathetic fraud on the unsuspecting and the gullible. > >You're a fraud, Ed, and your "fossils" are a hoax. You are just a > >poor, pathetic wretch with a failed journalistic career who longs for > >the attention your deficient skills and intellect have denied you. > >You wanted that "big story" at a time when there were many such > >stories; but even the NATIONAL ENQUIRER rejected you. > >But the biggest rejection came from science, because science has the > >power to expose you; and science HAS exposed you. > >So you've embarked on this years-long campaign of ridicule (why isn't > >it the "argument of the mob" when YOU do it, hyporitical Ed?), > >character assassination, lies and paranoid rantings of {filter}. > >You've done this because you haven't he guts that it takes to accept > >responsibility or error. > >Ed, you can spam the newsgroups with your repost of "understanding the > >anus" if you wish; and you and I both know that Google won't allow a > >response to every one of them because they limit the number of posts > >within a certain time period. > >That's okay, I don't need to respond to each one - just to one in each > >newsgroup. And that's how I'll do it. > >There are no more free rides for you and your ilk in Usenet, Ed. The > >last bastion of hope that you had to foist your lies on an > >unsuspecting public is yet another failure for you. > >You have no one to blame but yourself. > >< snip > > > =============================================== > > UNDERSTANDING THE{filter*} -- i.e. David Sitenkiewicz > > ================================================ > I don't think this question is really as complicated as it sounds. Oh, my, isn't THIS clever? Ed, is this the best you can do - to repeat an already-rebutted article over and over? Ed, where is your evidence that I work for anyone? The answer is that you have none. You made it up. You lied. < snip >
Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:44:33 GMT

#8 / 9	LATE UPDATE-- Ed Conrad Guest on Larry King Live Friday -- Note to Affiliates
Fri, 19 Jun 1992 00:00:00 GMT

Ed Conr #9 / 9	LATE UPDATE-- Ed Conrad Guest on Larry King Live Friday -- Note to Affiliates Quote: >> >> >> >< >> >> >> >> ========================================== >> >> >> >> ========================================== >> >> >> >> ========================================== >> >> >> >< >> >> >> >PC51404cncn-//:-AUG5.2003xp3112-9:05dst >> >> >> >CNN/ATLANTA/LateUpdate/cnn232/rsp >> >> >> >< >> >> >> >< >> >> >> >> ATTENTION: ALL CNN AFFILIATES >> >> >> >> CONFIDENTIAL MEMO < >> >> >> >> Late Programing Change >> >> >> >> Guests -- Larry King Live >> >> >> >> Friday, 9 p.m., Aug. 15, 2003 >> >> >> >< >> >> >> >Due to circumstances beyond our control, Ed Conrad >> >> >> >will NOT appear on Larry King Live at 9 p.m. Friday, >> >> >> >Aug. 15, 2003. >> >> >> >< >> >> >> >Nor at any time in the foreseeable future. >> >> >< snip rest > >> >> >That's true, Ed. Everything you've put in this newsgroup about this >> >> >has been a complete fabrication on your part. >> >> >> > WHAT 'LARRY KING LIVE,' TV NEWS SHOWS AND >> >> >> > MAJOR NEWSPAPERS DON'T WANT YOU TO SEE >> >> >Now, now, Ed. If the people at CNN and Larry King's show thought for >> >> >a second that you actually had something, they'd have you on in a >> >> >heartbeat. >> >> >We all know that. >> >> >But if even trash TV won't talk to you, Ed, that tells us something, >> >> >doesn't it? >> >> >> >Here are just a few of the many mindboggling specimens >> >> >> >of petrified human and animal bones, teeth and even soft organs >> >> >> >that were discovered between anthracite veins in NE Pennsylvania. >> >> >No, Ed, what they are are rocks and concretions. Not one of them is a >> >> >specimen of animal remains. >> >> >> >It means humans and large land animals -- including dinosaurs >> >> >> >and giant prehistoric scorpions -- existed on earth a minimum >> >> >> >of 280 million years ago. >> >> >We know about large scorpions, but the rest is not true. >> >> >> >Yep, it's the very same strata where the Scientific Establishment >> >> >> >has long insisted that the remains of neither man nor large land >> >> >> >animals could ever be found. >> >> >And the "scientific establishment" is right. >> >> >> >The Scientific Establishment is in adamant denial and therefore >> >> >> >says they're rocks and concreteions even though they are well >> >> >> >aware that all sort of state-of-the-art scientific testing had been >> >> >> >done on these specimens -- ALL with positive results. >> >> >No, Ed, this is another lie. Your claims to "state-of-the-art >> >> >scientific testing" have been exposed as deliberate lies and >> >> >misrepresentations. >> >> >> >Testing has included microscopic identification of Haversian canals >> >> >> >(miniscule circles, the telltale sign of bone); CATscans; infrared >> >> >> >scans; calculus analysis by crystallography (performed at American >> >> >> >Medical Laboratories in Chantilly, Va.); SEM (scanning electronic >> >> >> >microscopy); PLUS the favorable endor{filter}t of both Wilton M. >> >> >> >Krogman, one of the world's foremost authorities on human anatomy, >> >> >> >and world famous anthropologist/anatomist Raymond Dart, as well >> >> >> >as the written confirmation of B-O-N-E by Jeremy Dahl, then a leading >> >> >> >bone expert at Yerkes Regional Primate Research Center in Atlanta, Ga. >> >> >All false, Ed, as has been explained many times. >> >> >> >These petrified bones, teeth and even soft organs, as can be >> >> >> >expected, have the Scientific Establishment shaking in its boots. >> >> >No, Ed, the only one shaking in his boots is YOU. >> >> >You thought you'd be able to get away with these lies in Usenet, but >> >> >some of us have been exposing you. >> >> >> >It also has the major TV network news shows -- like Larry King Live -- >> >> >> >protecting their ass as they continue to ignore the physical >> >> >> >evidence as they play stooge to decades of deceit, deception, >> >> >> >collusion and {filter}, the only thing that has kept the theory of >> >> >> >the evolution of man alive (but now has it on its death bed).. >> >> >No, Ed, that's just how you'd like to represent things in light of >> >> >your own delusions. >> >> >> >In descending order, the incredible petrifiedfossils include a human >> >> >> >calvarium (a portion of a skull with the eye sockets broken >> >> >> >off which was identified by world famous bone expert Wilton >> >> >> >Krogman, author of "The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine"); >> >> >Krogman thought you were "something of a lunatic," Ed. He didn't >> >> >IDENTIFY anything. >> >> >< snip remainder > >> >> >Ed, every one of these specimens has been falsified or at least called >> >> >into serious question. ONE might be a fossil, but it is not a fossil >> >> >of what you claim it to be - it is simply a prehistoric plant form. >> >> >The simple fact, Ed, is that you're a liar. That's what it really >> >> >boils down to; and for whatever reason, you continue to lie. >> >> >So I'll continue to expose you. >> >> The feeling is mutual... >> >I'm not interested in feelings, Ed. I'm interested in facts. >> >You don't have any facts. >> >> > =============================================== >> >> > UNDERSTANDING THE{filter} -- i.e. David Sitenkiewicz >> >> > ================================================ >> >Yes, I see that you are widely reposting this bit of nonsense. >> >Your comment above would imply that this is an expose of some kind, >> >but it is, in fact a load of lies. >> >Ed, I answered this article several times. One of those answers may >> >be found here: >> > http://www.**.com/ :david.sienkiewicz%40attbi.co... >> >Now, Ed, to cut to the chase: Where is your evidence that I work for >> >ANYONE, let alone the "scientific establishment?" >> >The fact is that you don't have any evidence, do you? >> >You made it up. >> >You lied. >> >You did that because you could not answer any of the valid criticisms >> >that I have levelled at your claims or your "evidence." You can't >> >deal with the specific issues, so you CREATED another issue. >> >Your problem, Ed, is that you are not only a liar, you are a BAD liar; >> >and as soon as anyone challenges your lies with specific demands for >> >evidence, you either run away, disappear for a time, post bad poetry, >> >or repost past articles. >> >You don't have any evidence for anything; but you continue to try to >> >foist your pathetic fraud on the unsuspecting and the gullible. >> >You're a fraud, Ed, and your "fossils" are a hoax. You are just a >> >poor, pathetic wretch with a failed journalistic career who longs for >> >the attention your deficient skills and intellect have denied you. >> >You wanted that "big story" at a time when there were many such >> >stories; but even the NATIONAL ENQUIRER rejected you. >> >But the biggest rejection came from science, because science has the >> >power to expose you; and science HAS exposed you. >> >So you've embarked on this years-long campaign of ridicule (why isn't >> >it the "argument of the mob" when YOU do it, hyporitical Ed?), >> >character assassination, lies and paranoid rantings of {filter}. >> >You've done this because you haven't he guts that it takes to accept >> >responsibility or error. >> >Ed, you can spam the newsgroups with your repost of "understanding the >> >anus" if you wish; and you and I both know that Google won't allow a >> >response to every one of them because they limit the number of posts >> >within a certain time period. >> >That's okay, I don't need to respond to each one - just to one in each >> >newsgroup. And that's how I'll do it. >> >There are no more free rides for you and your ilk in Usenet, Ed. The >> >last bastion of hope that you had to foist your lies on an >> >unsuspecting public is yet another failure for you. >> >You have no one to blame but yourself. >> >< snip > >> > =============================================== >> > UNDERSTANDING THE{filter} -- i.e. David Sitenkiewicz >> > ================================================ >> I don't think this question is really as complicated as it sounds. >Oh, my, isn't THIS clever? >Ed, is this the best you can do - to repeat an already-rebutted >article over and over? >Ed, where is your evidence that I work for anyone? >The answer is that you have none. You made it up. >You lied. >< snip > =============================================== =============================================== UNDERSTANDING THE{filter} -- i.e. David Sienkiewicz ================================================ I repeat: Attorney David Sienkiewicz is a paid hit man for the Scientific Establishment. And the Scientific Establishment, undoubtedly using your tax dollars to pay for his unrelenting -- and rather unsuccessful -- {filter} on truth, is now realizing he's actually detriment, not an asset. The ... read more »*
Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:55:45 GMT

Page 1 of 1

[ 9 post ]