Author |
Message |
Robert LaDea #1 / 11
|
 Nurses drawing blood
This was once planned where I work at, during a reengineering period. It never flew, I think because of a near nursing revolt. It seems many nurses consider it beneath their position to draw {*filter*}. However, in previous places I have been, it was routine for the nurses to draw. This was at a federal VA hospital and a major naval hospital. The lab would take care of the morning routine draws, and then the nursing staff would draw all stats and any other draw during the day. Phlebotomists would do outpatient drawing only. I don't mind drawing {*filter*}, but sometimes I work alone at night. I'm not going to drop everything at a moments notice to do a stat draw. (Do I let a stat ER crossmatch sit there and let someone bleed while I draw a stat electrolytes in ICU)? Considering they refuse to draw it, there may be quite a delay in that ICU result. I personally beleive in situations like this the nursing staff should be doing the phlebotomy. They don't have to leave their work area and whatever they are working on to draw something. They are already there. But then that would make proper patient care too easy. It seems to work reasonably well in government hospitals I have seen. Why is the private sector different? Robert LaDean
|
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 03:00:00 GMT |
|
 |
SJ Pr #2 / 11
|
 Nurses drawing blood
Quote: >This was once planned where I work at, during a reengineering period. It >never flew, I think because of a near nursing revolt. It seems many nurses >consider it beneath their position to draw {*filter*}.
I want to know where this comes from. At the last hospital where I worked, the techs also considered it beneath them to draw {*filter*}. Not only will they not go out on the floors to draw {*filter*}, they wouldn't draw ANYONE. Some of them don't even know how any more. Why is this? Is it because nearly anyone can be trained to draw {*filter*}? That's true, but it's not easy to be really good at it. Being good at drawing {*filter*} takes practice. The more veins you locate and puncture, the better you are. If the nurses are going to be starting IVs regularly, then they *should* be the ones drawing {*filter*}. They know their patients best. In any case, anyone performing venipunctures should always be completely and well trained. I think a lot of hospitals and schools neglect the finer points of doing a good job with phlebotomy and just assume that once you get an IV in or take a {*filter*} sample a couple of times, that you're proficient and capable of handling any situation. I think that many of us forget what a scary ordeal {*filter*} drawing is when you're new at it. YMMV. Sandra
|
Wed, 01 Nov 2000 03:00:00 GMT |
|
 |
Steallig #3 / 11
|
 Nurses drawing blood
Sandra writes If the nurses are going to be Quote: >starting IVs regularly, then they *should* be the ones drawing {*filter*}. >They know their patients best.
Nurses are not routinely trained either in IV starts or phlebotomy. I would hate to tell you how many BS RN's I trained to start IV's when I worked in a recovery room while in my own undergrad days. And as we all recall, the mechanics of starting a line differ somewhat from the mechanics of removing {*filter*}. Sadly, those RN's who receive any training at all in IV insertion are nearly always taught to start the smallest gauge line they can as distally as possible. It is impossible for them to then draw {*filter*} through these lines and then further impossible to sample above the IV site. I won't even begin to list my opinions about this practice in use in the ER during trauma and codes. Happily dancing in the Phil Zone and scattering Garcia Ashes! http://www.***.com/ Healthcare: The bottom line is patients not profits!
|
Thu, 02 Nov 2000 03:00:00 GMT |
|
 |
SJ Pr #4 / 11
|
 Nurses drawing blood
Quote: >Sandra writes >If the nurses are going to be >>starting IVs regularly, then they *should* be the ones drawing {*filter*}. >>They know their patients best. >Nurses are not routinely trained either in IV starts or phlebotomy. I would >hate to tell you how many BS RN's I trained to start IV's when I worked in a >recovery room while in my own undergrad days. And as we all recall, the >mechanics of starting a line differ somewhat from the mechanics of removing >{*filter*}.
Oh, I agree with you 100%, Stev. That's why I stress TRAINING for anyone drawing {*filter*}. This includes things like order of draw, location, causes of bad samples, etc etc etc... I know that most nurses arrive on the job with little or no phlebotomy training of any kind. Quote: > Sadly, those RN's who receive any training at all in IV insertion are nearly >always taught to start the smallest gauge line they can as distally as >possible. It is impossible for them to then draw {*filter*} through these lines and >then further impossible to sample above the IV site. > I won't even begin to list my opinions about this practice in use in the ER >during trauma and codes.
It's funny, something I've always found, nurses are afraid to put IVs in the antecubital, and our techs are nervous about placing IVs anywhere else. Training, Training, Training. I got sick at work with some post-surgical complications a few months ago, and my partner Karen offered to place a catheter. She did so in my mid-forearm. When I arrived at the hospital for admission, the staff just about freaked at the placement of the site. The head nurse came in and said "Am I to understand you already have IV access?" Since there wasn't one in my hand, they questioned whether they could infuse through it. I do NOT like people fiddling around with the veins in my hands. They let me keep the line I had. OTOH, an anesthesiologist started a small gauge line on the volar surface of my mid-forarm (OUCH), and then when I came out of surgery, I found that one going, plus a very large bore catheter in the ulnar side of my wrist ON THE SAME ARM. One of these puppies was for a central line. I believe there is some upstart company in California that operates a phlebotomy school. Now there's a novel idea. Might actually get some people out in the field that can FEEL veins rather than stick only what they can see. I'm not going to argue with you, Stev, because you're right.
|
Thu, 02 Nov 2000 03:00:00 GMT |
|
 |
Robert LaDea #5 / 11
|
 Nurses drawing blood
I work at a hospital in Lake Forest Illinois
Quote: >This was once planned where I work at, during a reengineering period. It >never flew, I think because of a near nursing revolt. It seems many nurses >consider it beneath their position to draw {*filter*}.
I want to know where this comes from. At the last hospital where I worked, the techs also considered it beneath them to draw {*filter*}. Not only will they not go out on the floors to draw {*filter*}, they wouldn't draw ANYONE. Some of them don't even know how any more. Why is this? Is it because nearly anyone can be trained to draw {*filter*}? That's true, but it's not easy to be really good at it. Being good at drawing {*filter*} takes practice. The more veins you locate and puncture, the better you are. If the nurses are going to be starting IVs regularly, then they *should* be the ones drawing {*filter*}. They know their patients best. In any case, anyone performing venipunctures should always be completely and well trained. I think a lot of hospitals and schools neglect the finer points of doing a good job with phlebotomy and just assume that once you get an IV in or take a {*filter*} sample a couple of times, that you're proficient and capable of handling any situation. I think that many of us forget what a scary ordeal {*filter*} drawing is when you're new at it. YMMV. Sandra
|
Thu, 02 Nov 2000 03:00:00 GMT |
|
 |
Steallig #6 / 11
|
 Nurses drawing blood
Quote: >It's funny, something I've always found, nurses are afraid to put IVs >in the antecubital, and our techs are nervous about placing IVs >anywhere else. Training, Training, Training.
nursing students and trainees are taught " Start low and work up as the veins blow. Me, I learned in the field under very adverse conditions, Big Line for resusicitation. Start it where ever you can find access. But then I was interested in saving the lives of my fellow combatants and not worried about what some academically oriented instructor might have to say. Your co-worker was correct in gaining access where she did. Oh, do you remember how to regulate an IV by counting drops without the use of an expensive infusor pump? stev Happily dancing in the Phil Zone and scattering Garcia Ashes! http://members.aol.com/steallight/index/ Healthcare: The bottom line is patients not profits!
|
Fri, 03 Nov 2000 03:00:00 GMT |
|
 |
SJ Pr #7 / 11
|
 Nurses drawing blood
Quote: >I work at a hospital in Lake Forest Illinois
But WHY is it "beneath" anyone? Why is it "scut" work?
|
Fri, 03 Nov 2000 03:00:00 GMT |
|
 |
Gar #8 / 11
|
 Nurses drawing blood
Just for the record and my 2 cents worth, nurses like to start the largest gauge they can but tend to use veins which are as low as possible on the arm. This way your infusion is not limited in the volume you can push in, if necessary. By using a site low on the arm, you will have additional options further up the arm should the current one go bad. Nurses avoid the antecubital vein under normal condtions since an IV in this site will affect the patients ability to bend his arm while he is a patient. Phlebotomists like using the antecubital since it is usually in about the same place, tends to be large and easy to find. Gary
|
Fri, 03 Nov 2000 03:00:00 GMT |
|
 |
ACzub #9 / 11
|
 Nurses drawing blood
concerning drawing {*filter*}: Quote: >But WHY is it "beneath" anyone? Why is it "scut" work?
Probably because, a few years ago, labs that I know were gearing toward Specialists in a department. In larger labs, there were fewer techs who did work in more than 1 department. Now the emphasis is on cross-training, back to where it started. During this time, budgets were better, so more people could be hired to do the non-technical things, like draw {*filter*}. Of course, these people (phelbotomists) were hired in at a lower pay scale. So if the payscale is lower, that must mean the job is lower in status. So now, with cutbacks in job positions, some may feel that they are being 'demoted' to a lower job, even if their pay doesn't reflect this. The feeling may be that they have spent their time in getting a degree, then are doing a job that doesn't take a degree. In my position, I don't have to draw {*filter*}, but I wind up doing a lot of clerical type work. I look at it as, 'boy, are they nuts in paying me what I get to do this'. I find this attitude works a lot better than any bitter feelings I may have had at one time. Just my 2 cents, Anne Czubek
|
Sat, 04 Nov 2000 03:00:00 GMT |
|
 |
PinNneed #10 / 11
|
 Nurses drawing blood
Sandy mentioned a Phlebotomy school being a good idea, we have several operating in SE Mass. It's a tough course for the length of it. I think it's a 3 month program. At my last job, we hired 3 program grads, all of whom passed the ASCP exam. They are great. They really know their stuff and take a lot of pride in it. They could ask the right questions at the right time. The biggest plus was they are wonderful with the patients. It's worth getting well trained phelbs.
|
Mon, 06 Nov 2000 03:00:00 GMT |
|
 |
msg #11 / 11
|
 Nurses drawing blood
Here, here, Anne..I couldn't agree more. I've caught myself, too, thinking "Heck, I must be the highest paid receptionist in this whole lab". Mark G, MT(ASCP)
|
Tue, 07 Nov 2000 03:00:00 GMT |
|
|
|