Quote:
>If you truly believe that what is directed at you is "her mental illness" or
>a
>product of it, then yeah, you should be big enough, and compassionate enough
>not to respond.
>Unfortunately, you appear to be having some fun at the expense of someone you
>believe is mentally disabled. There's no way to put a veneer of decency on
>that, Joel.
>How many people do you think are reading this newsgroup whose opinions are
>just
>as opposed, but who manage not to engage in this obsessive baiting and
>waiting
>game you play? It appears as if you enjoy the battling too much to see its
>idiocy and futility.
>I truly believe you mean well and do some good, but you're deluded if you
>think
>your behavior here is on any higher level than that which you decry.
>Susan
Susan: I am NOT having fun at anyone's expense. It isn't 'fun' for me either
when these fights break out. I don't enjoy being personally attacked any more
than the next poster.
HOWEVER, when I post something informative and anyone responds by providing
inaccurate information, then I respond.
When someone else posts something That I find to be inaccurate, I respond.
My main goal is the dissemination of ACCURATE information.
When Kathleen or anyone else suggests that I should not be trusted, then I
respond--whether that PUBLIC suggestion comes from her mental illness or not.
So many people have expressed concern for the newbies here. That is EXACTLY the
issue. They don't know who to trust.
My concern is not about what Helen thinks or Brian or Marleen--I already know
that they reject everything I say--whether it is fact or opinion. My concern is
not what everyone else thinks either. I really don't care. Overall the regulars
see what I do and can make their own judgments--including realizing that like
other people, I am not perfect and I have moments when my behavior reflects
those imperfections. And they forgive me or not--just as I do with them.
My concern is that people come here, not knowing whom to trust. And they
receive information which is WRONG. Or they are led to believe that they
shouldn't trust information which is RIGHT.
You have received email from me with my support group logo. You should note
that I have included two slogans underneath the logo:
1. Join us in the fight to end the Lyme Disinformation Age;
2. THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE--even about Lyme Disease.
Both those 'slogans' convey my concern and the reason that I respond. I want to
make sure people get good information about Lyme--not bad information from *US*
or *THEM*.
That is why I criticize the ALDF and the American College of Physicians (and
Witchcraft) AND I criticize Doug Dodge's Lyme"truth." Bad information is bad
information from *US* or from *THEM.*
And I respond either when I see something clearly WRONG or when people try to
undermine my credibility in some fashion.
OR when I'm just in too rotten a mood to tolerate all the ridiculous and insane
BS.
That is why I responded to Kathleen.
There are many reasons that accurate information is important:
1. People need it to understand and empower themselves to make good health care
choices;
2. We need it as a movement to empower ourselves to make intelligent
choices--one problem with our activists is that they don't understand the real
issues--and being told that the other side are LIARS and FRAUDS is not helpful;
3. the LIARS and FRAUDS approach detracts from our credibility and distracts
from a better strategy and approach;
4. Our credibility is adversely impacted by disseminating incorrect
information;
etc.
I am NOT playing any 'obsessive baiting and waiting game' either. I NEVER start
fights with other people. I do SOMETIMES respond to their taunts--but many
times I don't. I don't enjoy the battling--however, if I engage in it, I intend
to respond more effectively than the person I am fighting with.
One thing that happens with unfortunate frequency is that I respond to an idea,
and someone responds with an attack on ME as a person (whom they don't even
know).
So when someone attacks me, and I respond with my poison pen, and then they cry
that I am a bully, all I can say is it is their fault for starting it--and for
coming to a battle of the wits only half armed.
And I am NEVER as bad as they are. I disagree that I am EVER on their level. If
I ever thought that I was getting as bad as any of them, I would immediately
seek the help that I would be in need of, or I would kill myself rather than
EVER be like them. I don't start this BS, I don't like this BS but I also don't
intend to give up my right to respond to this BS--whether anyone likes it or
not.
It is ALWAYS so easy to sit back and say 'can't we all just get along.' But it
is much different when those people themselves get invovled in a fight. Then
they fight just as much as everyone else.
What I think is NOT helpful is all the chiming in from the everpresent peanut
gallery. What turns a dispute between two people into a message group war is
all the chiming in--which means that the issue expands beyond the two who are
involved.
And I would point out, Susan, that YOUR comments were NOT made to me privately
but publicly. IF your motives here were so pure, then you would have addressed
this to me privately., not publicly, as you have done in the past.
So although I know that you mean well too and that you do some good, your posts
here can only further inflame the situation, not calm it down. Again, it is
easy to be the one saying 'let's all get along' but that NEVER calms the
fighting down--it just comes off as holier than thou and sanctimonious.
And in the case of message board fights, instead of calming things down, it
always further inflames the situation and extends the fight both in time and in
number of people involved.
As I already said: I am NOT a perfect person. I do NOT expect to get into
heaven. I don't really care what people think of me as a person--I am secure
enough about what I am and who I am that I am NOT here seeking approval or
praise--I am here trying to share information.
My suggestion to you and everyone else is: just don't get involved. Or as the
bible puts it: let he who is without sin cast the first stone...
And Susan, I KNOW (and so does everyone else) that YOU are not without sin
when it comes to fighting with people, so the first stone caster cannot be you.
So, nothing personal, but what was inappropriate here was your public
sermon--if you really meant well it would have been delivered PRIVATELY. Maybe
you made yourself feel good by coming off as a reasonable person, but the only
thing your posts could do is further inflame things, and serve your own sense
of self righteousness.
To quote YOU: I truly believe that you mean well and do some good, but YOU are
deluded if you think that your behavior here is on a higher level that that
which you decry.
joel :- )