
FDA approves Erbitux for head, neck cancer (mClone exploring the possibility of selling the company)
Quote:
> <http://today.reuters.com/investing/FinanceArticle.aspx?type=businessN...>
> Wed Mar 1, 2006 7:45 PM ET
> By Susan Heavey and Bill Berkrot
> WASHINGTON/NEW YORK (Reuters) - U.S. regulators on Wednesday approved
> ImClone Systems Inc.'s colon cancer drug Erbitux to treat head and neck
> cancer in cases when surgery is not an option or standard chemotherapy
> fails.
> "We consider this approval an important advance in the treatment of head
> and neck cancer because it has been shown to help some patients live
> longer," said Steven Galson, head of the FDA's drug division. "Patients
> need as many effective treatment options as possible."
> The FDA said it based its decision on a study that showed Erbitux with
> chemotherapy could help some patients live 20 months longer than with
> radiation alone.
> On its own, Erbitux helped shrink tumors by 13 percent for an average of
> six months.
> The drug was approved in combination with chemotherapy for when surgery is
> not an option, and as a stand alone treatment in cases in which
> chemotherapy has failed, the FDA said.
http://patient.cancerconsultants.com/head_cancer_news.aspx?id=30708
The trial presented at ASCO was conducted by researchers affiliated with the Erbitux Head and Neck Study Group, and included 417 patients with
locally advanced head and neck cancer.
Approximately half of the patients were treated with Erbitux? plus high-dose radiation therapy, and the other half were treated with high-dose
radiation therapy only and were directly compared. After over 3 years of follow-up (38 months), the average duration of survival was 58 months
in the group of patients treated with Erbitux?/radiation, compared with only 28 months for those treated with radiation only.
Three-year overall survival was 57% for patients treated with Erbitux?/radiation, compared with only 44% for those treated with radiation only.
The only notable side effect associated with Erbitux? was skin rash.
The researchers concluded that the addition of Erbitux? to high-dose radiation therapy significantly improves survival compared to high-dose
radiation therapy alone in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer.
The presenter stated that Erbitux? appears to provide comparable survival benefits to chemotherapy in the treatment of these patients, without
the side effects associated with chemotherapy.
Future clinical trials to evaluate the clinical role of Erbitux? against other therapies in the treatment of head and neck cancer or earlier in
the course of the disease is warranted.
Patients diagnosed with locally advanced head and neck cancer may wish to speak with their physician about the risks and benefits of
participation in a clinical trial further evaluating Erbitux? or other promising therapeutic approaches.
Reference: Bonner J, et al. Phase III study of high dose radiation with or without cetuximab in the treatment of locoregionally advanced
squamous cell cancer of the head and neck. Proceedings from the 40th annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. New Orleans,
LA. 2004. Abstract #5507.
http://www.aetna.com/cpb/data/CPBA0684.html
Bonner, et al., (2004) reported on the results of a phase III trial to examine the impact of combining cetuximab with high dose radiation on
locoregional disease control and survival in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
The investigators randomized 424 patients with locoregionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, hypopharynx or larynx to
either radiation alone for 6-7 weeks, or radiation plus weekly cetuximab.
Following completion of treatment, patients were followed by physical examination and radiographic imaging every 4 months for 2 years, and then
every 6 months up to 5 years. Median survival was 54 months in subjects receiving cetuximab plus radiation therapy compared to 28 months in
subjects receiving radiation therapy alone.
The investigators noted that the overall toxicity profile was dominated by classic known effects of high dose head and neck radiation, although
some additional toxicity was attributed to cetuximab.
Significantly more subjects receiving combination therapy had grade 3/4 skin reactions (34%) than subjects receiving radiation therapy alone
(18%). Grade 3/4 infusion reactions were seen in 3% of subjects receiving cetuximab.
The investigators concluded that the addition of cetuximab to high dose radiation in patients with locoregionally advanced squamous cell
carcinoma of the head and neck demonstrated a statistically significant prolongation in overall survival. This clinical benefit was achieved
with minimal enhancement in the overall toxicity profile associated with curative-intent radiation therapy.