NASA's crash-test weather baloons don't fly 
Author Message
 NASA's crash-test weather baloons don't fly

Big brother's "diffuse darkspot" cover story alleges such
ground-disruption that it can be observed in the midst of
ground zero of the alleged "Apollo 15 lunar landing site";
funny--since last I saw--those footprints are still there!
(i.e. at the time of production under the domes of Area51)
**Which weather balloon does big brother want to "float"?**

1) The "footprints" are blown away by this "powerful" yet
   conspicuously *silent and invisible* LEM exhaust plume:
      "..the disruption in the structure of the lunar
       regolith is caused by the landing, Kreslavsky
       said. He contends that the alteration has been
       created by the (LEMs) engine during touchdown."
   So they can see this "disruption" from many miles away
   and yet no one could see it *close up* in hi-res color;

2) There was absolutely no surface-disturbance during the
   LEM's alleged "touchdown"--and with no blast crater to
   be seen on any of the "lunar" promotional photographs!
   neither is there any disturbance whatsoever at liftoff;
   neither is any exhaust plume visible under the LEM see
   the "footprints" remain perfectly intact & undisturbed.
   This is self-evident from examining NASA's own records,
   as shown on fox tv's documentary on the apollo landing
   hoaxes 'Did We Land On The Moon?' (aired Feb 15th 2001,
   and shown again some days later) and many websites, as
   < http://www.***.com/ ~dpwozney/apollo1.htm> et al,
   and examined in detail in books, videos, & other media;

   Other topical and I must say educational links include:
    http://www.***.com/

    http://www.***.com/
    http://www.***.com/
    http://www.***.com/
    http://www.***.com/
    http://www.***.com/
    http://www.***.com/
    http://www.***.com/

 (Give it up BB: your inept lies only fool the foolish.)

Quote:

>For those who care to see, the Apollo 15 landing site has been spotted on
>the moon...
> http://www.***.com/
>d_in_images_1.html

             "Oh what a tangled web we weave,
            When first we practise to deceive!"
             --Sir Walter Scott (1771-1832)


Sun, 19 Oct 2003 21:04:18 GMT
 NASA's crash-test weather baloons don't fly
Of COURSE they don't fly, crash-test balloons are SUPPOSED to crash.
Just like the submarines that keep sinking....
--

 Bill Foley

 P.S. Ignore the reply-to address, it is to foil spammers.
      and remove the plugh. from the "from" address, it, too, is to
      foil spammers.



Mon, 20 Oct 2003 06:19:23 GMT
 
 [ 2 post ] 

 Relevant Pages 

1. NASA's crash-test weather balloons don't fly . ,

2. UKR crash-test weather balloons for dummies

3. test--don't read

4. TEST don't bother to read

5. Test, don't ignore!

6. test don't read

7. Don't Read - a test post

8. Noah's Ark: PLEASE don't STOP

9. PLEASE don't read other people's mail

10. LET'S BUILD A FLYING SAUCER!

11. KRS: revision of Winchell's weathering date


 
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software