Nasa's getting desperate - apollo hoax proven fact 
Author Message
 Nasa's getting desperate - apollo hoax proven fact
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

"Look! The sun looks just like a bright spotlight"
 --comments an astro-naught on film at area 51

*All Moon Missions Unmanned:  

*Apollo Moon Hoax Bookmarks:

*Min's Home Page (updated 31-Oct-2002):

     ___

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBPcwdNZljD7YrHM/nEQIW4QCePIP2DelAXbwOl3ReSvXFtuNLhEEAnj6m
Ra7wzM0jMhpEjPJYFeBEXEZq
=mEGo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Tue, 26 Apr 2005 04:30:10 GMT
 Nasa's getting desperate - apollo hoax proven fact
i've got nothing to say to you except,
http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html

Quote:
> "Look! The sun looks just like a bright spotlight"
>  --comments an astro-naught on film at area 51

> *All Moon Missions Unmanned:


.org
Quote:

> *Apollo Moon Hoax Bookmarks:


.org
Quote:

> *Min's Home Page (updated 31-Oct-2002):


.org
Quote:

>      ___

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> iQA/AwUBPcwdNZljD7YrHM/nEQIW4QCePIP2DelAXbwOl3ReSvXFtuNLhEEAnj6m
> Ra7wzM0jMhpEjPJYFeBEXEZq
> =mEGo
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Tue, 26 Apr 2005 09:22:58 GMT
 Nasa's getting desperate - apollo hoax proven fact
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

"phil foosterbloot" wroote:

Quote:
>I personally watched 2 Apollo Moonshots launched
>from Cape Kennedy in the early 70's.

You watched two apollo who-shots? If they actually
made it to the Moon, they were definitely unmanned
missions. If they were manned, then they went into
low Earth-orbit i.e. well below the Van Allen Belt  
and splashed down just in time for the ticker tape.

Anyone who claims the solar radiation is "safe" to
transport any human being through in some scantily-
shielded conveyance is very obviously full of shit.
You'll notice how the "space" shuttles never orbit
beyond the safe altitudes below the Van Allen Belt.
They wouldn't dare! They don't want to die. Get it?

Quote:

>Nobody is going to tell me they launched those 28-story building
>tall rockets just to promogulate a hoax.

If either one or both of those 28-storey, Saturn V
rockets reached the Moon, then they were un-manned.
We know that unmanned missions to the Moon made it,
by virtue of manmade reflective devices left there.
We know that no manned missions made it, by virtue
of strong solar radiation and inadequate shielding,
the unproven, undependable and unstable "LEM", etc.
They couldn't make it so they faked it. Understand?
Quote:

>Finally if anyone
>want's to prove we went to the moon, all they have to do
>is search for the Hubbell Telescope photos NASA took
>of each of the landing sites - you can see the Flag, the Rover
>and the memorial cornerstone left in 1969 - The photographic
>evidence is on the net.

You'd need to provide a weblink to such photos.
Last I heard the Hubble can't zoom in that far,
or so they'd have us believe. How convenient...  

It's just like the Moon was "too bright" or the
Hubble "couldn't focus" on the Moon--until Nasa
posted crystal-clear Hubble photos of the Moon!
And then all of a sudden their excuses changed.
It's like pathological liars getting caught in
their own lies so they concoct more bs to cover
it up.  O what a tangled web spin-doctors weave...

Quote:

>optical arrays of  "corner reflectors" so Earth observatories
>can fire laser beams at them and receive the reflections back
>to measure the distance between the Earth and Moon on a        
>daily basis. If we did not go to the moon, then how did these
>man-made prismatic reflectors get on the moon's surface??
>(Prisims which are still in functional use to this day I may add...)

They were obviously left there by unmanned missions.
Even the USSR managed to follow suit soon after the
unmanned Apollo mission left those nifty reflectors
as facts in evidence prove incontrovertibly, to wit:

http://www.aerospaceguide.net/spacecraft/lunakhod.html
"Lunokhod 1 was the first successful Soviet remote-
 controlled moon rover that was carried to the Moon
 by Luna 17. It was launched November 10, 1970. The
 rover had eight wheels.
"The Luna 17 spacecraft landed on the moon on November
 17, 1970. Lunokhod 1 weighed just under 2,000 pounds
 and was designed to operate for 90 days while guided
 by a 5-person team. Lunokhod 1 explored the Mare
 Imbrium for 11 months and traveled 11km and relayed
 television pictures and scientific data.  
 Lunokhod 2 moon rover was an improved version of
 Lunokhod 1. It was carried to the moon on Luna 21
 and landed on January 16, 1973. Lunokhod 2 was faster
 and carried an additional television camera. It
 travelled 37km in only 8 weeks." [end quote]

http://www.zarya.info/Diaries/Luna/Lunokhod1.htm
"Lunokhod 1 went to the Moon aboard Luna 17. Its
 eight wire-mesh wheels each has its own electric
 motor to allow manoeuvring in tight spaces, and so
 failure of a single motor did not prevent it from
 moving.
 The lidded box at the left is a French-built laser
 reflector. It was used to reflect back to Earth a
 laser beam, making it possible to measure the
 distance between the Earth and Moon to an accuracy
 of twenty to thirty centimetres" [end quote]

http://www.zarya.info/Diaries/Luna/Lunokhod2.htm
"There is an additional high-level TV camera for
 panoramic photography, and all lenses have
 improved sunshades.
 The small silver box between the front wheels is
 an alpha particle emitter which can be lowered
 onto the Moon to measure soil composition. Like
 its predecessor, Lunokhod 2 carries a French
 retro-reflector for use with a laser beam
 transmitted from Earth. It allows the Earth-Moon
 distance to be measured to an accuracy around 20
 centimetres.

http://www.zarya.info/Diaries/Luna/Luna16.htm
"the cone-shaped antenna keeps communication with
 Earth while the drill arm sits in its rest position
 on the right. The sample will be taken by rotating
 the drill head by one hundred and eighty degrees,
 lowering the drill arm to the surface and extracting
 a core sample.
 On returning to the rest position, the sample is
 transferred to the return capsule and sent back to
 Earth" [end quote]

Therefore the Soviet Lunokhod I/II-Luna XVII/XXI missions
both successfully landed their unmanned remote-controlled
lunar-rovers a.k.a. dune-buggies on the Moon: in the same
time frame as the alleged "apollo" missions were supposed
to have occurred. These remote-controlled Russian buggies
placed French- made laser reflectors on the Moon! Another
Soviet unmanned mission, Luna XVI, landed on the Moon and
returned a soil sample to the Earth by September 24, 1970:
from the Moon, unmanned, programmed and remote-controlled.

So laser-reflecting mirror arrays were placed on the Moon
by unmanned probes and a 100g x 35 cm soil sample drilled
out from the lunar surface was sent back to Earth by this
earlier of these unmanned missions all in the early 1970s.
This completely and absolutely destroys any argument that
lunar soil samples or lunar laser reflectors "prove" that
men were on the Moon. Rather, as with all other evidences
cited allegedly supporting of the "apollo" missions, upon
precise examination the same evidence proves these apollo
missions were hoaxed. Men never went to the Moon. Got it?

By contrast, the Russians proved that they did send their
unmanned probes to the Moon to wit: the presence of laser
reflectors left thereon by the aforesaid Lunokhod buggies.
It could be argued that the lunar soil samples were faked
somehow, but the laser reflecting mirrors are irrefutable
evidence that unmanned robotic probes put them there. See?

At least, the demonstrable presence of the "apollo" laser
reflectors proves the American space program successfully
sent some unmanned probes to the Moon -and- has continued
to launch many unmanned instruments into space ever since.
All these missions are unmanned. Why? The Sun, that's why.
That's why they never send men into outer space. Not once.
Otherwise, they'd fry to a crisp in the intense radiation.

Quote:

>Anyone who believes that we went to the moon I feel very sorry for...

So you've finally come to your senses--what with
flags fluttering in the high-desert breeze, sand
buggies & actors running along in their deflated
monkeysuits-obviously recorded on highspeed film,
conspicuous absence of blast craters, impossibly
silent running under invisible exhaust emissions,
brazenly obvious backdrops that contrast sharply
against the nearby high-desert terrain, etc. etc.

And this is not to mention the intense radiation
of the Van Allen belt and all outer space beyond
it which alone proves perfectly incontrovertibly
that men *never* made it safely into outer space.
Who are they trying to kid, fools like you maybe?

Be sure to bookmark & study these eye-opening links
to mountains of evidence which proves NASA's men to
moon missions were bogus...it was nothing more than
an elaborate stage play perpetrated on unsuspecting
and understandably naive masses. The facts prove it:

  http://internet.ocii.com/~dpwozney/apollo1.htm
  http://www.aulis.com/nasa.htm
  http://www.grade-a.com/moon/
  http://www.apollohoax.com/
  http://www.moonmovie.com/
  http://www.futuresunltd.com/sudarshan/MoonShadows/MoonShadows.htm
  http://www.geocities.com/nasascam/
  http://www.ari.net/b2m/0198.html
  http://myspeedtest.net/backwards/moon.html
  http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/2666/MoonHoax2.html
  http://advweb.com/kw/forum/misc/messages/689.shtml
  http://clydelewis.com/dis/gorsky/gorsky.html
  http://galactic-guide.com/articles/8S12.html
  http://geocities.com/bradguth/moon-02.htm

  ***********************************************  
  NASA NEVER sent men to the Moon! "They couldn't                `
  make it so they faked it". That's what they did.
  ***********************************************

*The Copernican Blunder - Facts Don't Lie:  

*Min's Home Page (updated 31-Oct-2002):

Case closed,
Next case please!
Daniel Joseph Min

   __
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBPcyOn5ljD7YrHM/nEQIY3gCg9xUEaOvFkgwkb/DI7kHt8K1THswAn15o
ilNJUq5zBrotQdr98BQRfRn1
=Osu2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

     `



Tue, 26 Apr 2005 12:50:10 GMT
 Nasa's getting desperate - apollo hoax proven fact


Quote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

<snipped >

Could you give me a link where I might see evidence
supporting the notion we couldn't survive the Van Allen
Radiation Belt ?

Thanks

Jim



Tue, 26 Apr 2005 13:42:03 GMT
 Nasa's getting desperate - apollo hoax proven fact

Quote:

>Could you give me a link where I might see evidence
>supporting the notion we couldn't survive the Van Allen
>Radiation Belt ?
>Thanks
>Jim

I should have added with the shielding present on the
moon mission.

Jim



Tue, 26 Apr 2005 14:04:02 GMT
 Nasa's getting desperate - apollo hoax proven fact
-> >Could you give me a link where I might see evidence  
-> >supporting the notion we couldn't survive the Van Allen
-> >Radiation Belt ?
-> >Thanks
-> >Jim

-> I should have added with the shielding present on the  
-> moon mission.

-> Jim

There wasn't much shielding. But the spacecraft passed through the
belts very fast, so the amounts of radiation the astronauts received
were tolerable. It's true that the men wouldn't have survived *for long
periods* in the belts without shielding, but they didn't have to.

                                  dow



Tue, 26 Apr 2005 22:07:33 GMT
 Nasa's getting desperate - apollo hoax proven fact

Quote:
> > "Look! The sun looks just like a bright spotlight"
> >  --comments an astro-naught on film at area 51

If the comment was "Look! The bright spotlight looks like the sun." then it
might support your ridiculous argument. As it stands, it's a simple
comparison that makes perfect sense.
--

Regards,

Eddie Trimarchi
~~~~~~~~~~~
http://www.astroshed.com
http://www.fitsplug.com


Quote:
> i've got nothing to say to you except,
> http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html

> > "Look! The sun looks just like a bright spotlight"
> >  --comments an astro-naught on film at area 51

> > *All Moon Missions Unmanned:


Quote:
> .org

> > *Apollo Moon Hoax Bookmarks:


Quote:
> .org

> > *Min's Home Page (updated 31-Oct-2002):


Quote:
> .org

> >      ___

> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > iQA/AwUBPcwdNZljD7YrHM/nEQIW4QCePIP2DelAXbwOl3ReSvXFtuNLhEEAnj6m
> > Ra7wzM0jMhpEjPJYFeBEXEZq
> > =mEGo
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Fri, 29 Apr 2005 14:50:47 GMT
 Nasa's getting desperate - apollo hoax proven fact
Man... okay... if you can't afford to BUY a telescope - go find someone who
has a decent Kmart / WalMart Telescope - it won't take much to find the junk
we left behind up there - even the flag is visible if you know where to
look.

Now - if the Apollo Missions was a fake... how'd we leave all that {*filter*}up
there?  Don't take my word for it - use your own eyes people!!!


Quote:
> i've got nothing to say to you except,
> http://www.***.com/

> > "Look! The sun looks just like a bright spotlight"
> >  --comments an astro-naught on film at area 51

> > *All Moon Missions Unmanned:


Quote:
> .org

> > *Apollo Moon Hoax Bookmarks:


Quote:
> .org

> > *Min's Home Page (updated 31-Oct-2002):


Quote:
> .org

> >      ___

> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > iQA/AwUBPcwdNZljD7YrHM/nEQIW4QCePIP2DelAXbwOl3ReSvXFtuNLhEEAnj6m
> > Ra7wzM0jMhpEjPJYFeBEXEZq
> > =mEGo
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Wed, 11 May 2005 07:17:33 GMT
 Nasa's getting desperate - apollo hoax proven fact
-> Man... okay... if you can't afford to BUY a telescope - go find someone who
-> has a decent Kmart / WalMart Telescope - it won't take much to find the junk
-> we left behind up there - even the flag is visible if you know where to
-> look.

-> Now - if the Apollo Missions was a fake... how'd we leave all that {*filter*}up
-> there?  Don't take my word for it - use your own eyes people!!!

I don't believe that the Apollo missions were faked. But I also don't
believe that you or anyone else can see the hardware they left on the
lunar surface with a hobbyist's telescope - or *any* existing
ground-based telescope. At present, those things are simply too small
to see. Maybe, fairly soon, telescopes will be built that can see these
relics, but they won't be sold at Wal-Mart!

I have read that some of the tracks left by the lunar rovers can be
seen with extremely large telescopes. And also, of course, the laser
reflectors that were left on the moon can still be used. But that's
all.

                                 dow



Fri, 13 May 2005 18:52:17 GMT
 Nasa's getting desperate - apollo hoax proven fact



Quote:
> Man... okay... if you can't afford to BUY a telescope - go find someone
who
> has a decent Kmart / WalMart Telescope - it won't take much to find the
junk
> we left behind up there - even the flag is visible if you know where to
> look.

> Now - if the Apollo Missions was a fake... how'd we leave all that {*filter*}up
> there?

The Moon  is a holographic projection???

Quote:
> Don't take my word for it - use your own eyes people!!!

Well, the World is flat, isn't it?<g>

:o)



Fri, 13 May 2005 21:25:13 GMT
 Nasa's getting desperate - apollo hoax proven fact
You people that keep saying that we can see the things we left on the moon
need to learn a bit about what you're preaching.

http://www.***.com/
--

Regards,

Eddie Trimarchi
~~~~~~~~~~~
http://www.***.com/
http://www.***.com/


Quote:



> > Man... okay... if you can't afford to BUY a telescope - go find someone
> who
> > has a decent Kmart / WalMart Telescope - it won't take much to find the
> junk
> > we left behind up there - even the flag is visible if you know where to
> > look.

> > Now - if the Apollo Missions was a fake... how'd we leave all that {*filter*}
up
> > there?

> The Moon  is a holographic projection???

> > Don't take my word for it - use your own eyes people!!!

> Well, the World is flat, isn't it?<g>

> :o)



Fri, 13 May 2005 22:18:12 GMT
 Nasa's getting desperate - apollo hoax proven fact
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002 14:18:12 GMT, "Eddie Trimarchi"

Quote:

>You people that keep saying that we can see the things we left on the moon
>need to learn a bit about what you're preaching.

>http://www.tass-survey.org/richmond/answers/lunar_lander.html

Very true, the only things which might be considered "visible", would
be the laser reflectors. Strictly speaking they cannot be seen, but, a
properly aligned laser, reflecting back from them, can be detected.
(boy, this is quite a collection of Newsgroups, this trash is being
spewed across! With only one of them halfway relevant. I apologize to
the mannered posters in these other groups and I will trim the other
groups in the future from my responses)  


Sat, 14 May 2005 00:02:17 GMT
 Nasa's getting desperate - apollo hoax proven fact


Quote:
> Man... okay... if you can't afford to BUY a telescope - go find someone
who
> has a decent Kmart / WalMart Telescope - it won't take much to find the
junk
> we left behind up there - even the flag is visible if you know where to
> look.

> Now - if the Apollo Missions was a fake... how'd we leave all that {*filter*}up
> there?  Don't take my word for it - use your own eyes people!!!

As much as I'd love to show the doubters that they could see the
U.S.A. Flag on the moon, here is what it said about that. Scan
down in this link to the last selection "flag on the moon." At least
it says that with the Hubble you might be able to see the shadow
of the flag:
http://www.***.com/
Look also at this explanation:
http://www.***.com/
Scan down to "Is the American flag still on the moon?"
http://www.***.com/
As a matter of fact, I remember seeing this, and was surprised
that they could not make the pole perfectly perpendicular to the
surface on the moon. Not only that, but the flag did not "wave"
which I did not think about until the moment that it was put on
the moon, because there is no atmosphere of blowing winds.
The flag appeared to look rippled, yet it was stiff looking. It was
four feet long approximately. Here is NASA's explanation for the
flag, and why it is rippled looking.
If you have trouble opening this URL, type into your browser
just nasa.gov - it is no longer necessary in most browsers to use
the http: etc., or the www. and in the home page of NASA, look
for their "search" browser, and just type in "flag on the moon"
and you will get this page:
http://www.***.com/
I do not think that the people who started this whole moon hoax
thing DIDN'T believe that man went to the moon...in fact, I believe
that they DID believe that we went to the moon, and they just want
to discredit the USA and turn people against the government.
Suzanne


Fri, 10 Jun 2005 02:46:41 GMT
 Nasa's getting desperate - apollo hoax proven fact
[]SNIP]

Quote:

>I do not think that the people who started this whole moon hoax
>thing DIDN'T believe that man went to the moon...in fact, I believe
>that they DID believe that we went to the moon, and they just want
>to discredit the USA and turn people against the government.

Sounds quite possible to me. I don't think it's likely anyone who could
create such stories could be stupid enough to believe them.

Doug
 --

 Doug Weller member of moderation panel sci.archaeology.moderated

 Doug's Archaeology Site: http://www.ramtops.demon.co.uk



Fri, 10 Jun 2005 05:15:57 GMT
 Nasa's getting desperate - apollo hoax proven fact
Once more...
http://www.***.com/

--

Regards,

Eddie Trimarchi
~~~~~~~~~~~
http://www.***.com/
http://www.***.com/


Quote:



> > Man... okay... if you can't afford to BUY a telescope - go find someone
> who
> > has a decent Kmart / WalMart Telescope - it won't take much to find the
> junk
> > we left behind up there - even the flag is visible if you know where to
> > look.

> > Now - if the Apollo Missions was a fake... how'd we leave all that {*filter*}
up
> > there?  Don't take my word for it - use your own eyes people!!!

> As much as I'd love to show the doubters that they could see the
> U.S.A. Flag on the moon, here is what it said about that. Scan
> down in this link to the last selection "flag on the moon." At least
> it says that with the Hubble you might be able to see the shadow
> of the flag:
> http://www.***.com/
> Look also at this explanation:
> http://www.***.com/

> Scan down to "Is the American flag still on the moon?"
> http://www.***.com/

> As a matter of fact, I remember seeing this, and was surprised
> that they could not make the pole perfectly perpendicular to the
> surface on the moon. Not only that, but the flag did not "wave"
> which I did not think about until the moment that it was put on
> the moon, because there is no atmosphere of blowing winds.
> The flag appeared to look rippled, yet it was stiff looking. It was
> four feet long approximately. Here is NASA's explanation for the
> flag, and why it is rippled looking.
> If you have trouble opening this URL, type into your browser
> just nasa.gov - it is no longer necessary in most browsers to use
> the http: etc., or the www. and in the home page of NASA, look
> for their "search" browser, and just type in "flag on the moon"
> and you will get this page:
> http://www.***.com/

> I do not think that the people who started this whole moon hoax
> thing DIDN'T believe that man went to the moon...in fact, I believe
> that they DID believe that we went to the moon, and they just want
> to discredit the USA and turn people against the government.

> Suzanne



Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:20:22 GMT
 
 [ 16 post ]  Go to page: [1] [2]

 Relevant Pages 

1. Apollo lunar hoaxes: BB's tangled web of deception

2. Dante - PROVEN FACT!

3. NASA plans new Apollo mission

4. MultiRegionalism proven fact

5. Apollo Lunar HOAX!

6. P.S. Re: Apollo missions elaborate hoax

7. "apollo men-to-moon" hoax proven beyond refutation

8. NASA's 'Apollo TV' program (was: Weirder election...)

9. NASA's crash-test weather baloons don't fly

10. BB's "lunar landings" proven elaborate hoax

11. JPL/NASA's "Apollo" manned missions to Sun

12. NASA's worn-out "apollo-men-to-the-moon" fairy tale


 
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software