Immunex and why JanDrew is laying low ........ 
Author Message
 Immunex and why JanDrew is laying low ........

This little company lost $4 billion in market valuation today! This is why
Hulda does not like double-blind studies. If Hulda lost $4 billion, Dr.
Frank Jerome and JanDrew would each have to chip in $2 billion apiece.

*******

Immunex Corporation is a biopharmaceutical company that discovers, develops,
manufactures and markets innovative therapeutic products for the treatment
of human diseases, including cancer, infectious diseases and immunological
disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis. The Company's products are currently
marketed in the United States and are available by prescription only. The
Company's research focus has produced a pipeline of potential products that
targets some of the most serious medical challenges people face, including
cancer, multiple sclerosis, heart disease and asthma.
More from Market Guide: Expanded Business Description

Financial Summary
 Immunex is a biopharmaceutical firm that develops, markets, and
manufactures innovative therapeutic products for the treatment of cancer,
infectious diseases, and immunological disorders. For the fiscal year ended
12/31/00, revenues increased 59% to $861.8 million. Net income totalled
$154.4 million, up from $44.3 million. Revenues reflect strong demand for
ENBREL. Earnings reflect increased interest income due to investment funds
from the issuance of convertible debt.
More from Market Guide: Significant Developments



Wed, 10 Sep 2003 06:25:36 GMT
 Immunex and why JanDrew is laying low ........

**This little company lost $4 billion in market valuation today! This is why
**Hulda does not like double-blind studies. If Hulda lost $4 billion, Dr.
**Frank Jerome and JanDrew would each have to chip in $2 billion apiece.
**

joel ... sick, hopefully beneath your dignity humour ... or is it?



Wed, 10 Sep 2003 07:24:07 GMT
 Immunex and why JanDrew is laying low ........
    I see nothing wrong with the practice of safety and effectiveness studies.
No, testimonials don't cut it with me.  This ng is exhibit A for why they don't.

Steve

Quote:



> **This little company lost $4 billion in market valuation today! This is why
> **Hulda does not like double-blind studies. If Hulda lost $4 billion, Dr.
> **Frank Jerome and JanDrew would each have to chip in $2 billion apiece.
> **

> joel ... sick, hopefully beneath your dignity humour ... or is it?



Wed, 10 Sep 2003 07:23:08 GMT
 Immunex and why JanDrew is laying low ........

Quote:

>Date: 3/23/01 5:25 PM US Eastern Standard Time

>Subject: Immunex and why JanDrew is laying low ........

LOL Joel is missin me. He needs attention bad! Happy searching Joel, run all
over now and see if you can find something to make up about Jan.You are having
lying withdrawls.

Poor Joel

Jan



Wed, 10 Sep 2003 08:16:07 GMT
 Immunex and why JanDrew is laying low ........


Quote:


> **This little company lost $4 billion in market valuation today! This is
why
> **Hulda does not like double-blind studies. If Hulda lost $4 billion, Dr.
> **Frank Jerome and JanDrew would each have to chip in $2 billion apiece.
> **

> joel ... sick, hopefully beneath your dignity humour ... or is it?

No Dr. Frank Jerome, the dentist helped Hulda find her miraculous cancer
treatment! This part is true!


Wed, 10 Sep 2003 15:38:09 GMT
 Immunex and why JanDrew is laying low ........


Quote:

> >Date: 3/23/01 5:25 PM US Eastern Standard Time

> >Subject: Immunex and why JanDrew is laying low ........

> LOL Joel is missin me. He needs attention bad! Happy searching Joel, run
all
> over now and see if you can find something to make up about Jan.You are
having
> lying withdrawls.

> Poor Joel

> Jan

REPLY:

Jan, about chelation therapy, I have some interesting but alarming news for
you. Are you being chelated by an M.D. and if so, what is your dosage?



Wed, 10 Sep 2003 15:40:33 GMT
 Immunex and why JanDrew is laying low ........


Quote:
>     I see nothing wrong with the practice of safety and effectiveness
studies.
> No, testimonials don't cut it with me.  This ng is exhibit A for why they
don't.

> Steve

REPLY:

My thinking too. I had no idea before the internet how goofy patients really
are .....

Quote:




> > **This little company lost $4 billion in market valuation today! This is
why
> > **Hulda does not like double-blind studies. If Hulda lost $4 billion,
Dr.
> > **Frank Jerome and JanDrew would each have to chip in $2 billion apiece.
> > **

> > joel ... sick, hopefully beneath your dignity humour ... or is it?



Wed, 10 Sep 2003 15:39:10 GMT
 Immunex and why JanDrew is laying low ........


Quote:

> > >Subject: Immunex and why JanDrew is laying low ........

> > LOL Joel is missin me. He needs attention bad! Happy searching Joel, run
> all
> > over now and see if you can find something to make up about Jan.You are
> having
> > lying withdrawls.

> > Poor Joel

> > Jan

> REPLY:

> Jan, about chelation therapy, I have some interesting but alarming news
for
> you. Are you being chelated by an M.D. and if so, what is your dosage?

In fact, the huge drop of $4 billion in one day made me ask why? Immunex is
a hugely successful company (market capitalization of $10 billion on
Thursday, $6 billion on Friday). They make an RA (Rheumatoid Arthritis)
drug. They are testing it for cardiac therapy. Hmmmm. Actually, makes sense.
RA is an autoimmune or (immune) problem. They work towards resolving the
citokine problem, specifically TNF.

How about alternative means? This lead me to some thinking about JanDrew,
Dr. Jerome and his bogus treatment and possible harm to his patients!

Cheers,

Joel

- Show quoted text -



Wed, 10 Sep 2003 20:16:26 GMT
 Immunex and why JanDrew is laying low ........

Quote:

>Date: 3/24/01 7:16 AM US Eastern Standard Time



>> > >Subject: Immunex and why JanDrew is laying low ........

>> > LOL Joel is missin me. He needs attention bad! Happy searching Joel, run
>> all
>> > over now and see if you can find something to make up about Jan.You are
>> having
>> > lying withdrawls.

>> > Poor Joel

>> > Jan

>> REPLY:

>> Jan, about chelation therapy, I have some interesting but alarming news
>for
>> you. Are you being chelated by an M.D. and if so, what is your dosage?

>In fact, the huge drop of $4 billion in one day made me ask why? Immunex is
>a hugely successful company (market capitalization of $10 billion on
>Thursday, $6 billion on Friday). They make an RA (Rheumatoid Arthritis)
>drug. They are testing it for cardiac therapy. Hmmmm. Actually, makes sense.
>RA is an autoimmune or (immune) problem. They work towards resolving the
>citokine problem, specifically TNF.

>How about alternative means? This lead me to some thinking about JanDrew,
>Dr. Jerome and his bogus treatment and possible harm to his patients!

>Cheers,

>Joel

LOL Joel is dreaming about Dr Jerome and Jan!

Jan



Thu, 11 Sep 2003 03:45:46 GMT
 Immunex and why JanDrew is laying low ........

Quote:

>Date: 3/24/01 2:40 AM US Eastern Standard Time




>> >Date: 3/23/01 5:25 PM US Eastern Standard Time

>> >Subject: Immunex and why JanDrew is laying low ........

>> LOL Joel is missin me. He needs attention bad! Happy searching Joel, run
>all
>> over now and see if you can find something to make up about Jan.You are
>having
>> lying withdrawls.

>> Poor Joel

>> Jan

>REPLY:

>Jan, about chelation therapy, I have some interesting but alarming news for
>you. Are you being chelated by an M.D. and if so, what is your dosage?

Where have you been Joel? Do you ever *read*,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,or just instantly
blow off. I have posted several times how I am chelating. Do a search ole pal,
use the words Standard Process.

Now what is the alarming news?

Jan



Thu, 11 Sep 2003 03:52:37 GMT
 Immunex and why JanDrew is laying low ........


Quote:

> LOL Joel is dreaming about Dr Jerome and Jan!

> Jan

Please note:

Still no specifics about WHO is chelating Jan and at what dose!

Joel M. Eichen, D.D.S.

Sat, March 23, 2001 -- should be 2003 before we find out!



Thu, 11 Sep 2003 05:58:51 GMT
 Immunex and why JanDrew is laying low ........


Quote:
> >REPLY:

> >Jan, about chelation therapy, I have some interesting but alarming news
for
> >you. Are you being chelated by an M.D. and if so, what is your dosage?

> Where have you been Joel? Do you ever *read*,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,or just
instantly
> blow off. I have posted several times how I am chelating. Do a search ole
pal,
> use the words Standard Process.

REPLY:

68,000 posts ........

Linking Process I/O streams to standard I/O
... to link Process IO streams (generated by functions getInputStream(),
getOutputStream()
in Process class) to standard in/out, so that whatever the user types is ...
comp.lang.java.programmer - 20 Aug 2000 by Yaroslav Bulatov - View Thread
Bug#88935: xdelta: non-standard build process leaves important ...
Package: xdelta Version: 1.1.1-3 Severity: normal "debian/rules
build" does not make ...
debian.bugs.dist - 08 Mar 2001 by Yann Dirson - View Thread

Re: reply with history process (like standard email)
The script to do this is in the FAQ at www,keysolutinos.com/notesfaq
search for "quoted ...
comp.groupware.lotus-notes.misc - 08 Nov 2000 by Danny Lawrence - View
Thread

Problem executing expect from program on large system
... new InputStreamReader(process.getInputStream())); String line; String
normal; normal
= reader.readLine(); System.out.println("This is the standard output text
...
comp.unix.aix - 18 Mar 2001 by Ron Parker - View Thread

Re: Is DICOM a real standard?
... TC 215 on medical informatics to come up with a process by which DICOM
could be adopted
as an ISO standard, without messing with its technical content, without ...
comp.protocols.dicom - 27 Jan 2001 by David Clunie - View Thread

Re: Source for Cell Salts
... twelve cell salts in a bottle of 1,000 tiny pellets (brand: Standard
Process) from
the national discount vitamin house of Vitamin Shoppe. Vitamin Shoppe has a
...
misc.health.alternative - 16 Jan 2001 by JDrew63929 - View Thread

Re: child process cannot access global variable
... declared a global variable "msg", the child process alway printed out
the value of
msg ... wrong newsgroup, fork() is not a standard C function (and standard C
is ...
comp.lang.c - 30 Jan 2001 by Arthur H. Gold - View Thread

FAQ 8.12: How do I start a process in the background?
... an excerpt from the documentation provided with every Standard
Distribution of Perl.
+ How do I start a process in the background? You could use system("cmd &
...
comp.lang.perl.misc - 21 Mar 2001 by PerlFAQ Server - View Thread

Re: SGI WorkStation
... Test Time: 39.28 secs Test #7: Process render options Test Time: 16.32
secs ... MSMBench
Benchmark Report MicroStation/J Standard Benchmark Test Test #1:Video ...

Re: Kansas BOE purges falsification from standard
... more realistic fashion with the new standard. Instead of using silly
examples as ... about
how science works as a process. Instead of concentrating on the mythical ...
talk.origins - 22 Jan 2001 by Larry Handlin - View Thread

Result Page:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next

Quote:

> Now what is the alarming news?

> Jan



Thu, 11 Sep 2003 06:31:47 GMT
 Immunex and why JanDrew is laying low ........


Fri, 19 Jun 1992 00:00:00 GMT
 Immunex and why JanDrew is laying low ........

Subject: Re: Whats the best for chelating mercury
Newsgroups: sci.med.dentistry
View complete thread
Date: 2001-03-08 17:53:55 PST


Quote:

> >Date: 3/8/01 10:41 AM US Eastern Standard Time

> >I have a fairly high mercury count hair, urine and saliva. On my doctors
> >advice I am having all amalgams replaced with something without mercury -
> >composite. There being no other possible sources of mercury in my daily
> >life.

> >I need to chelate the mercury burden from my body and organs accumulated
> >after years of having these amalgams (looking at how much mercury is
there
> >it will take a few years)  but I wonder are there is any alternatives to
> >DMSA or DMPS? I hear that Nacetylcystein and Alpha Lipoic Acid are good
at
> >chelating mercury. Is this right?

> You must be very careful in chelating. The ones you have listed are good,
but
> must be taken at certain times after all the metal is removed. I would not
> chelate without the supervision of a good alternative practitioner. I am
seeing
> a Contact Reflex Analysis (muscle testing) she can tell how I am chelating
and
> what supplements to take. I use Standard Process supplements.

REPLY:

There is also danger of a walletectomy occurring unexpectedly .......

Quote:

> >thanks

> >Hoping to have my kidneys, lungs and liver back after I get rid of all
the
> >mercury built up in them. Hoping to have a life again.

> I know exactly how you feel. You will also need to do some kidney cleanses
as
> they will be getting a work out.

Kidney cleanses? Whazzat?

Quote:
>You most likely also have mercury in the
> brain.

Now this I suspect is completely true ......

Be very very careful. When you start detoxing you will get very sick.

May we recommend a cure for ALL disease? Please call Hulda Clark and be sure
to bring with $4,500.

Quote:
> Also you may even need to do some detoxing before the dental work. Most
> importanly find a good alternative dentist who knows the dangers of metal
in
> the mouth. If he uses mercury fillings, find one who doesn't. Make sure he
uses
> a {*filter*} dam.

Gosh. That is rocket science. I never even heard of a {*filter*} dam before
........

If you have a regular dentist do the work and he leaves even one

Quote:
> speck of metal in, you will be in trouble.

One speck can explode ........

Quote:

> I have been through this, if I can help you in any way please e-mail me.


Quote:

> WARNING: Most dentists here will try to tell you that it is
fish..........not
> your fillings,,,,,,,,etc.

Please get the fish removed by an alternative fishologist who uses a {*filter*}
dam ....

Quote:

>  Just find a good alternative dentist, there you will learn more than you
will
> here.

You and your banker will both learn a lot more ........

Quote:

> Good Luck!!!

Yep. Goodby and good luck!

Quote:

> Jan

Google Web Directory - Cool Jobs - Advertise with Us! - Add Google


Thu, 11 Sep 2003 06:33:14 GMT
 Immunex and why JanDrew is laying low ........


Fri, 19 Jun 1992 00:00:00 GMT
 
 [ 31 post ]  Go to page: [1] [2] [3]

 Relevant Pages 

1. Stan Goloslov .... lay low this am

2. why will you lay the industrial underground groupings before Karl does

3. Why JanDrew should be careful with nonsensical anti-mercury supplements

4. JanDrew! JanDrew recommends avoiding urinals

5. JanDrew Vs. Eichen, JanDrew Vs. The World

6. looking for IMMUNEX

7. looking for IMMUNEX

8. Immunex wins US approval for wider Enbrel use

9. Why am I tired?

10. Why am I so bloody slow?

11. Why am i bruising so easily?!


 
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software