Amalgams #1 Source of mercury in people
Author |
Message |
Ja #1 / 37
|
 Amalgams #1 Source of mercury in people
Amalgams are the principle source of exposure in the population. Any chemist can put amalgams in solution and measure mercury vapor evaporating from the solution. If the solution is heated or acidic or if you place another metal in the solution then more vapor will be released. Dentists are required by law to dispose of s{*filter*}amalgam as a hazardous waste. So by federal law even the mercury alloy is too hazardous to flush down the toilet. Either the federal government is overreacting in response to s{*filter*} amalgam disposal or it is underreacting in response to dentists placing that amalgam in the mouth. Mercury amalgam cannot be both hazardous and safe. One of the regulatory policies must be in error: either the 19th-century dental practice is wrongheaded, or the late-20th-century amalgam disposal practice is wrongheaded. It is interesting to note that no pro-amalgamists have pointed out the hysteria in the government's policy on s{*filter*}amalgam disposal. So the underlying sentiment in the pro-amalgamist seems to be a deep trust in old traditions and the intelligence of bureacracies, over and against a consistency of thought and logic demanded by individuals. When urinary excretions and {*filter*} measurements prove themselves to be erorenous indicators of mercury body burden, this doesn't cause the pro-amalgamist to question the Science supporting amalgam safety. He cannot believe that a poison such as mercury can really hazardous when placed in the mouth. So now he must look at the particular compounds in which mercury may find itself in the body, with the effort of minimizing its toxicity, to maintain his believe in the wisdom of 19th-century dentists and the bureacratic mind.
|
Sun, 24 Oct 2004 09:07:53 GMT |
|
 |
#2 / 37
|
 Amalgams #1 Source of mercury in people
|
Fri, 19 Jun 1992 00:00:00 GMT |
|
 |
Vaughn Simo #3 / 37
|
 Amalgams #1 Source of mercury in people
Source: University Of Kentucky Medical Center Date Posted: Wednesday, February 10, 1999 Web Address: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1999/02/990210065946.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Mercury In Dental Fillings Does Not Appear To Cause Alzheimer's, According To University Of Kentucky Study LEXINGTON, KY (Feb. 8, 1999) - Mercury used in dental fillings does not appear to cause Alzheimer's disease, according to a new study by University of Kentucky researchers. Results of the study are published in the lead article in today's Journal of the American Dental Association. The study compared mercury levels in autopsied brains, and dental amalgam status and history in Alzheimer's disease subjects as well as control subjects. The researchers found no significant association of Alzheimer's disease with the number, surface area or history of dental amalgams. "Our key finding is that there is no relationship whatsoever between mercury found in the brain and amalgam," said Stanley Saxe, D.M.D., one of the study 's authors and a professor emeritus of periodontics and geriatric dentistry in the UK College of Dentistry. "Although very small amounts of mercury are released from dental amalgam - generally when rubbed or abraded due to brushing or eating - it is not taken up by the brain." Funded by a grant from the National Institutes of Health, the study was prompted by scientific controversy on the topic that has been brewing for several years. The study, which began in 1991, was a collaborative effort among researchers from the UK Sanders-Brown Center on Aging and the UK College of Dentistry. Saxe and William Markesbery, M.D., director of the Sanders-Brown Center on Aging, led the research team. "The uniqueness of the collaborative effort between the departments of chemistry, statistics, the College of Dentistry and leadership from the Center on Aging, made this research possible and successful," Markesbery said. "This is the only study that has looked at this question in a large group of people," Saxe said. Dental amalgam has been used since the early 1830s and is considered an excellent restorative material in dentistry because of its strength and durability. However, because dental amalgam is comprised of 50 percent mercury, a neurotoxin, it has been the subject of continuing controversy as a possible public health risk. "The fact that there was no differential found in brain mercury levels due to dental amalgams is very exciting news for the dentistry profession," Saxe said.
|
Sun, 24 Oct 2004 09:24:14 GMT |
|
 |
carabell #4 / 37
|
 Amalgams #1 Source of mercury in people
Quote: > Source: University Of Kentucky Medical Center > Date Posted: Wednesday, February 10, 1999 > Web Address:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1999/02/990210065946.htm Quote: > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > ---- > Mercury In Dental Fillings Does Not Appear To Cause Alzheimer's, According > To University Of Kentucky Study > LEXINGTON, KY (Feb. 8, 1999) - Mercury used in dental fillings does not > appear to cause Alzheimer's disease, ....................
The University of Kentucky is in DEANIAL, DENILE, DENIALE!! carabelli
|
Sun, 24 Oct 2004 09:30:39 GMT |
|
 |
Ja #5 / 37
|
 Amalgams #1 Source of mercury in people
Quote: >Subject: Re: Amalgams #1 Source of mercury in people?
>Date: 5/7/02 6:30 PM Pacific Daylight Time
>> Source: University Of Kentucky Medical Center >> Date Posted: Wednesday, February 10, 1999 >> Web Address: > http://www.***.com/ >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >-- >> ---- >> Mercury In Dental Fillings Does Not Appear To Cause Alzheimer's, According >> To University Of Kentucky Study >> LEXINGTON, KY (Feb. 8, 1999) - Mercury used in dental fillings does not >> appear to cause Alzheimer's disease, .................... > The University of Kentucky is in DEANIAL, DENILE, DENIALE!! >carabelli
Hardy har har. I demand to know what time it was when he posted this! Was it in the middle of the night and he suddenly got up?????...:-) A BIG OOOPISE HAS OCCURED! http://www.***.com/ #dental amalgam Vaughn left OUT this part,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Imagine that,,,,,,,,and just last week, he posted. The Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine is indeed a serious publication that I have been following intermittantly for the last couple of years. I agree with Jan that everyday occupational exposure to small amounts of toxins can add up to a serious problem over many years of exposure. I have little doubt that dentists should also be concerned aboutoccupational respitory problems. Thankfully, today's dentists are exposed to much less mercury than in the past. I will be very interested in reading that article when it is available. While looking on the journal's website, I found the below February article on mercury exposure. The article discusses the relationship between fish consumption and mercury levels and discusses the validity of "alternative"methods of mercury testing. I wonder why Jan did not bother to bring this one to our attention? Vaughn Of course the February article was not what was being discussed. Moving on. I wonder why Vaughn didn't bring this to our attention?,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,*;* ******Contrast this study published in the Journal of the American Dental Association with previous studies by the research scientists in this group when dentists were not involved****** Brain trace elements in Alzheimer's disease. Neurotoxicology 1986 Spring;7(1):195-206 Ehmann WD, Markesbery WR, Alauddin M, Hossain TI, Brubaker EH Instrumental neutron activation analysis has been used to determine the concentrations of 16 elements in selected brain regions and separated gray- and white-matter specimens from histologically verified Alzheimer's disease (AD) and age-matched control patients. Significantly different (p less than 0.05) mean concentrations of Br, Cl, Cs, Hg, N, Na, P, and Rb were observed in AD bulk brain samples compared to controls, while no significant differences were observed for Ag, Co, Cr, Fe, K, Sb, Sc, and Se. The differences that are most persistent and largest in magnitude for the pooled bulk samples, males and females, left and right hemispheres, and separated gray and white matter are the elevation of Br and Hg and the depletion of Rb in AD compared to controls. Significant interelement correlations for the latter elements in both AD and control brains are also documented. Based on these studies, the possibility of an etiological role for trace elements in AD clearly deserves further investigation. [] Regional brain trace-element studies in Alzheimer's disease. Neurotoxicology 1988 Spring;9(1):1-7 Thompson CM, Markesbery WR, Ehmann WD, Mao YX, Vance DE Department of Chemistry, University of Kentucky, Lexington 40506. Alzheimer's disease (AD) brain trace-element imbalances in the amygdala, hippocampus and nucleus basalis of Meynert (nbM) are found in most cases to be consistent with those previously reported in samples derived principally from AD cerebral cortex (Ehmann et al., 1986). The elevation of mercury in AD nbM, as compared to age-matched controls, is the largest trace-element imbalance observed to date in AD brain. In addition to the general confirmation of imbalances for Cs, Hg, N, Na, P, and Rb noted previously in cerebral cortex samples, imbalances for Fe, K, Sc, and Zn were observed in two regions and one region also exhibited imbalances for both Co and Se. Persistent imbalances for the univalent cations Na, K, Rb and Cs support arguments for a membrane abnormality in AD. The data presented here also provide the first comprehensive simultaneous multi-element determinations in both control and AD nbM. [] Trace element imbalances in hair and nails of Alzheimer's disease patients. Neurotoxicology 1988 Summer;9(2):197-208 Vance DE, Ehmann WD, Markesbery WR Department of Chemistry, University of Kentucky, Lexington 40506. The concentrations of 17 elements in the hair and nails of 180 Alzheimer's disease (AD) and control subjects have been determined by instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA). Comparisons of trace element levels of properly matched AD and control groups revealed significant imbalances in the concentrations of six elements (Br, Ca, Co, Hg, K, and Zn) between disease and control groups. It is noteworthy that each of these has previously been shown by our group, or others, to be altered in some AD brain region(s). Geometric means for each element in both hair and nails of AD and control subjects are presented, and significant differences noted. The significance of these alterations with regard to the possible role of trace elements in the etiology of AD is discussed. [] Trace element imbalances in isolated subcellular fractions of Alzheimer's disease brains. Brain Res 1990 Nov 12;533(1):125-31 Wenstrup D, Ehmann WD, Markesbery WR Department of Chemistry, University of Kentucky, Lexington. Concentrations of 13 trace elements (Ag, Br, Co, Cr, Cs, Fe, Hg, K, Na, Rb, Sc, Se, Zn) in isolated subcellular fractions (whole brain, nuclei, mitochondria, microsomes) of temp{*filter*}lobe from autopsied Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients and normal controls were determined utilizing instrumental neutron activation analysis. Comparison of AD and controls revealed elevated Br (whole brain) and Hg (microsomes) and diminished Rb (whole brain, nuclear and microsomes), Se (microsomes) and Zn (nuclear) in AD. The elevated Br and Hg and diminished Rb are consistent with our previous studies in AD bulk brain specimens. Comparison of element ratios revealed increased Hg/Se, Hg/Zn and Zn/Se mass ratios in AD. Se and Zn play a protective role against Hg toxicity and our data suggest that they are utilized to detoxify Hg in the AD brain. Overall our studies suggest that Hg could be an important toxic element in AD. Whether Hg deposition in AD is a primary or secondary eventremains to be determined. [] Imbalances of trace elements related to oxidative damage in Alzheimer's disease brain. Neurotoxicology 1998 Jun;19(3):339-45 Cornett CR, Markesbery WR, Ehmann WD Department of Chemistry, University of Kentucky, Lexington 40506-0055, USA. Four elements that have been implicated in free-radical-induced oxidative stress in Alzheimer's disease (AD) were measured by instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA) in seven brain regions from 58 AD patients and 21 control subjects. A statistically significant elevation of iron and zinc was observed in multiple regions of AD brain, compared with controls. Mercury was elevated in AD in most regions studied, but the high variability of mercury levels in both AD and control subjects prevented the AD-control difference from reaching significance. Selenium, a protective agent against mercury toxicity, was significantly elevated only in AD amygdala. The elevation of iron and zinc in AD brain has the potential of augmenting neuron degeneration through free radical processes. [] More studies published by other research scientists (with no dentist's involvement) showing that mercury is elevated in AD [] Increased {*filter*} mercury levels in patients with Alzheimer's disease. J Neural Transm 1998;105(1):59-68 Hock C, Drasch G, Golombowski S, Muller-Spahn F, Willershausen-Zonnchen B, Schwarz P, Hock U, Growdon JH, Nitsch RM Department of Psychiatry, University of Basel, Switzerland. Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a common neurodegenerative disorder that leads to dementia and death. In addition to several genetic parameters, various environmental factors may influence the risk of getting AD. In order to test whether {*filter*} levels of the heavy metal mercury are increased in AD, we measured {*filter*} mercury concentrations in AD patients (n = 33), and compared them to age-matched control patients with major depression (MD) (n = 45), as well as to an additional control group of patients with various non-psychiatric disorders (n = 65). {*filter*} mercury levels were more than two-fold higher in AD patients as compared to both control groups (p = 0.0005, and p = 0.0000, respectively). In early onset AD patients (n = 13), {*filter*} mercury levels were almost three-fold higher as compared to controls (p = 0.0002, and p = 0.0000, respectively). These increases were unrelated to the patients' dental status. Linear regression analysis of {*filter*} mercury concentrations and CSF levels of amyloid beta-peptide (A beta) revealed a significant correlation of these measures in AD patients (n = 15, r = 0.7440, p = 0.0015, Pearson type of correlation). These results demonstrate elevated {*filter*} levels of mercury in AD, and they suggest that this increase of mercury levels is associated with high CSF levels of A beta, whereas tau levels were unrelated. Possible explanations of increased {*filter*} mercury levels in AD include yet unidentified environmental sources or release from brain tissue with the
... read more »
|
Sun, 24 Oct 2004 10:21:39 GMT |
|
 |
carabell #6 / 37
|
 Amalgams #1 Source of mercury in people
posted this! Was it in the middle of Quote: > the night and he suddenly got up?????...:-)................ > A BIG OOOPISE HAS OCCURED!......
after hosting the after prom party last Friday, I found that I can have fun ANITIME!!! carabelli - who intends to post all misspellings in caps from now on - unless I miss it.
|
Sun, 24 Oct 2004 10:45:37 GMT |
|
 |
Ja #7 / 37
|
 Amalgams #1 Source of mercury in people
Quote:
>Date: 5/7/02 6:24 PM Pacific Daylight Time
>Stanley Saxe, D.M.D., one of the study >'s authors and a professor emeritus of periodontics and geriatric dentistry >in the UK College of Dentistry.
Uh huh,,,,,,,,, Quote: >"Although very small amounts of mercury are >released from dental amalgam - generally when rubbed or abraded due to >brushing or eating - it is not taken up by the brain."
LOL. Quote: >"The fact that there was no differential found in brain mercury levels due >to dental amalgams is very exciting news for the dentistry profession," Saxe >said.
******Contrast this study published in the Journal of the American Dental Association with previous studies by the research scientists in this group when dentists were not involved****** Brain trace elements in Alzheimer's disease. Neurotoxicology 1986 Spring;7(1):195-206 Ehmann WD, Markesbery WR, Alauddin M, Hossain TI, Brubaker EH Instrumental neutron activation analysis has been used to determine the concentrations of 16 elements in selected brain regions and separated gray- and white-matter specimens from histologically verified Alzheimer's disease (AD) and age-matched control patients. Significantly different (p less than 0.05) mean concentrations of Br, Cl, Cs, Hg, N, Na, P, and Rb were observed in AD bulk brain samples compared to controls, while no significant differences were observed for Ag, Co, Cr, Fe, K, Sb, Sc, and Se. The differences that are most persistent and largest in magnitude for the pooled bulk samples, males and females, left and right hemispheres, and separated gray and white matter are the elevation of Br and Hg and the depletion of Rb in AD compared to controls. Significant interelement correlations for the latter elements in both AD and control brains are also documented. Based on these studies, the possibility of an etiological role for trace elements in AD clearly deserves further investigation. [] Regional brain trace-element studies in Alzheimer's disease. Neurotoxicology 1988 Spring;9(1):1-7 Thompson CM, Markesbery WR, Ehmann WD, Mao YX, Vance DE Department of Chemistry, University of Kentucky, Lexington 40506. Alzheimer's disease (AD) brain trace-element imbalances in the amygdala, hippocampus and nucleus basalis of Meynert (nbM) are found in most cases to be consistent with those previously reported in samples derived principally from AD cerebral cortex (Ehmann et al., 1986). The elevation of mercury in AD nbM, as compared to age-matched controls, is the largest trace-element imbalance observed to date in AD brain. In addition to the general confirmation of imbalances for Cs, Hg, N, Na, P, and Rb noted previously in cerebral cortex samples, imbalances for Fe, K, Sc, and Zn were observed in two regions and one region also exhibited imbalances for both Co and Se. Persistent imbalances for the univalent cations Na, K, Rb and Cs support arguments for a membrane abnormality in AD. The data presented here also provide the first comprehensive simultaneous multi-element determinations in both control and AD nbM. [] Trace element imbalances in hair and nails of Alzheimer's disease patients. Neurotoxicology 1988 Summer;9(2):197-208 Vance DE, Ehmann WD, Markesbery WR Department of Chemistry, University of Kentucky, Lexington 40506. The concentrations of 17 elements in the hair and nails of 180 Alzheimer's disease (AD) and control subjects have been determined by instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA). Comparisons of trace element levels of properly matched AD and control groups revealed significant imbalances in the concentrations of six elements (Br, Ca, Co, Hg, K, and Zn) between disease and control groups. It is noteworthy that each of these has previously been shown by our group, or others, to be altered in some AD brain region(s). Geometric means for each element in both hair and nails of AD and control subjects are presented, and significant differences noted. The significance of these alterations with regard to the possible role of trace elements in the etiology of AD is discussed. [] Trace element imbalances in isolated subcellular fractions of Alzheimer's disease brains. Brain Res 1990 Nov 12;533(1):125-31 Wenstrup D, Ehmann WD, Markesbery WR Department of Chemistry, University of Kentucky, Lexington. Concentrations of 13 trace elements (Ag, Br, Co, Cr, Cs, Fe, Hg, K, Na, Rb, Sc, Se, Zn) in isolated subcellular fractions (whole brain, nuclei, mitochondria, microsomes) of temp{*filter*}lobe from autopsied Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients and normal controls were determined utilizing instrumental neutron activation analysis. Comparison of AD and controls revealed elevated Br (whole brain) and Hg (microsomes) and diminished Rb (whole brain, nuclear and microsomes), Se (microsomes) and Zn (nuclear) in AD. The elevated Br and Hg and diminished Rb are consistent with our previous studies in AD bulk brain specimens. Comparison of element ratios revealed increased Hg/Se, Hg/Zn and Zn/Se mass ratios in AD. Se and Zn play a protective role against Hg toxicity and our data suggest that they are utilized to detoxify Hg in the AD brain. Overall our studies suggest that Hg could be an important toxic element in AD. Whether Hg deposition in AD is a primary or secondary eventremains to be determined. [] Imbalances of trace elements related to oxidative damage in Alzheimer's disease brain. Neurotoxicology 1998 Jun;19(3):339-45 Cornett CR, Markesbery WR, Ehmann WD Department of Chemistry, University of Kentucky, Lexington 40506-0055, USA. Four elements that have been implicated in free-radical-induced oxidative stress in Alzheimer's disease (AD) were measured by instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA) in seven brain regions from 58 AD patients and 21 control subjects. A statistically significant elevation of iron and zinc was observed in multiple regions of AD brain, compared with controls. Mercury was elevated in AD in most regions studied, but the high variability of mercury levels in both AD and control subjects prevented the AD-control difference from reaching significance. Selenium, a protective agent against mercury toxicity, was significantly elevated only in AD amygdala. The elevation of iron and zinc in AD brain has the potential of augmenting neuron degeneration through free radical processes. [] More studies published by other research scientists (with no dentist's involvement) showing that mercury is elevated in AD [] Increased {*filter*} mercury levels in patients with Alzheimer's disease. J Neural Transm 1998;105(1):59-68 Hock C, Drasch G, Golombowski S, Muller-Spahn F, Willershausen-Zonnchen B, Schwarz P, Hock U, Growdon JH, Nitsch RM Department of Psychiatry, University of Basel, Switzerland. Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a common neurodegenerative disorder that leads to dementia and death. In addition to several genetic parameters, various environmental factors may influence the risk of getting AD. In order to test whether {*filter*} levels of the heavy metal mercury are increased in AD, we measured {*filter*} mercury concentrations in AD patients (n = 33), and compared them to age-matched control patients with major depression (MD) (n = 45), as well as to an additional control group of patients with various non-psychiatric disorders (n = 65). {*filter*} mercury levels were more than two-fold higher in AD patients as compared to both control groups (p = 0.0005, and p = 0.0000, respectively). In early onset AD patients (n = 13), {*filter*} mercury levels were almost three-fold higher as compared to controls (p = 0.0002, and p = 0.0000, respectively). These increases were unrelated to the patients' dental status. Linear regression analysis of {*filter*} mercury concentrations and CSF levels of amyloid beta-peptide (A beta) revealed a significant correlation of these measures in AD patients (n = 15, r = 0.7440, p = 0.0015, Pearson type of correlation). These results demonstrate elevated {*filter*} levels of mercury in AD, and they suggest that this increase of mercury levels is associated with high CSF levels of A beta, whereas tau levels were unrelated. Possible explanations of increased {*filter*} mercury levels in AD include yet unidentified environmental sources or release from brain tissue with the advance in neuronal death. [] Metals and trace elements in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid in normal aging and Alzheimer's disease. J Neural Transm Park Dis Dement Sect 1991;3(4):231-58 Basun H, Forssell LG, Wetterberg L, Winblad B. Department of Geriatric Medicine, Huddinge Hospital, Sweden. Cerebro-spinal fluid (CSF) and {*filter*} levels of aluminum, cadmium, calcium, copper, lead, magnesium, and mercury were studied in 24 subjects with dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT) and in 28 healthy volunteers. Furthermore, arsenic, bromine, chrome, iron, manganese, nickel, rubidium, selenium, strontium, and zinc were measured only in {*filter*}. There were significant changes in the DAT group when compared to the controls. The plasma levels of aluminum, cadmium, mercury and selenium were increased and the contents of iron and manganese were lower in the DAT group as compared to control subjects. In CSF there were low levels of cadmium and calcium and increased content of copper in DAT cases. Iron and zinc levels in {*filter*} and calcium in both {*filter*} and CSF of DAT patients correlated with memory and cognitive functions. Iron, manganese and strontium levels of DAT sufferers in {*filter*} and aluminum in CSF were related with changes in behavior. [] From these results one must conclude that mercury levels are elevated in the brain and tissues of Alzheimer's disease victims ONLY when dentists are NOT involved in the studies. [] Other studies by this same group of dentists [] Dental amalgam and cognitive function in older women: findings from the Nun Study. J Am Dent Assoc 1995 Nov;126(11):1495-501 Saxe SR, Snowdon DA, Wekstein MW,
... read more »
|
Sun, 24 Oct 2004 11:08:04 GMT |
|
 |
Ja #8 / 37
|
 Amalgams #1 Source of mercury in people
Quote: >Subject: Re: Amalgams #1 Source of mercury in people?
>Date: 5/7/02 7:45 PM Pacific Daylight Time
>posted this! Was it in the middle of >> the night and he suddenly got up?????...:-)................ >> A BIG OOOPISE HAS OCCURED!...... >after hosting the after prom party last Friday, I found that I can have fun >ANITIME!!! >carabelli - who intends to post all misspellings in caps from now on - >unless I miss it.
The typo and and misspelling squad meets at 4:00 AM sharp. Bring weapons. Jan
|
Sun, 24 Oct 2004 11:11:44 GMT |
|
 |
vaughn simo #9 / 37
|
 Amalgams #1 Source of mercury in people
Quote: > >Subject: Re: Amalgams #1 Source of mercury in people?
> >Date: 5/7/02 6:30 PM Pacific Daylight Time
> >> Source: University Of Kentucky Medical Center > >> Date Posted: Wednesday, February 10, 1999 > >> Web Address: > >http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1999/02/990210065946.htm >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- - > >-- > >> ---- > >> Mercury In Dental Fillings Does Not Appear To Cause Alzheimer's, According > >> To University Of Kentucky Study > >> LEXINGTON, KY (Feb. 8, 1999) - Mercury used in dental fillings does not > >> appear to cause Alzheimer's disease, .................... > > The University of Kentucky is in DEANIAL, DENILE, DENIALE!! > >carabelli > Hardy har har. > I demand to know what time it was when he posted this! Was it in the middle of > the night and he suddenly got up?????...:-
The time of the posting is contained in the header. Quote: > A BIG OOOPISE HAS OCCURED! > http://www.altcorp.com/alzheimers.htm#dental amalgam > Vaughn left OUT this part,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
No, I copied the entire article and it contained no references to crank, anti-amalgam websites. ...snip... Quote: > I wonder why Vaughn didn't bring this to our attention?,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,*;*
As I have told you before, amalgam is your subject, not mine. I posted a relevant article that I think that you and others should consider, that brings no obligation to post all OTHER relevant information that I might be able to find. That would bog down the Internet. Quote: > ******Contrast this study published in the Journal of the American Dental > Association with previous studies by the research scientists in this group when > dentists were not involved******
No; YOU contrast the studies. If you feel the need to refute the information that I posted, the proper way is to use your own logic backed up by references to reputable sources. You can't simply list or copy the sources and leave the thinking to others. Argue on the basis of research methods and scientific information. You can't simply drown out information that does not fit within your belief system by flooding us with "approved" information, you have to actually tell us where the other idea is wrong. {*filter*} theories are not very impressive; if that is the best you have to offer, don't bother.. The rest is snipped to save bandwidth. It is all available in the previous post in this thread. Vaughn
|
Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:32:58 GMT |
|
 |
Rich #10 / 37
|
 Amalgams #1 Source of mercury in people
Quote: >Crank? >I believe thatis an opinion, and yet you say you have no opinion of mercury >amalgams. >Hmmm.
After being diagnosed with PN Jan did research and became convinced that she had mercury poisoning due to amalgams. She then describes a rapid and progressive deterioration in her health and thought she was going to DIE. Then within HOURS of having SOME of the amalgams removed she posts on usenet that she felt better than she had in two years!!! And she did not have the rest of her amalgams out for SEVERAL days at the time she felt better than she had in two years!!!! And given the fact that she reports this rapid decline in health and being close to death, feeling better than she had in two years would be an incredibly dramatic improvement in health. And the above is COMPLETELY true if we are to believe Jan Drew since SHE is the one who provided this information and I have quoted Jan Drew to prove that she said it. So if Jan says that I lied then that must mean that SHE lied because I am only repeating her OWN words!!! And yet she blatantly lies on sci.med.dentistry when she states that the reason that she knows it was the mercury poisoning is because she started regaining her health AFTER her mercury level began to drop. This is a lie. And I could call it a lie because Jan has ADMITTED that she felt better than she had in two years before she had all the amalgams removed. And yet despite this being pointed out to Jan, she remains in a kind of psychotic denial and could only respond to my comments by personally attacking me. It would be funny if it were not so sad. Aloha, Rich ------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------ The best defense to logic is ignorance.
|
Mon, 25 Oct 2004 01:30:43 GMT |
|
 |
Vaughn Simo #11 / 37
|
 Amalgams #1 Source of mercury in people
Quote:
> >Date: 5/8/02 4:32 AM Pacific Daylight Time
> >http://www.altcorp.com/alzheimers.htm#dental amalgam > >No, I copied the entire article and it contained no references to crank, > >anti-amalgam websites. > Crank? > I believe thatis an opinion, and yet you say you have no opinion of mercury > amalgams. > Hmmm.
I have an opinion about crank, junk-science websites, regardless of topic. You don't need them Jan, you have what is between your ears and you have PubMed. Do it right and perhaps you might actually convince someone. Jan, you seem to have cut out the below paragraph. Now cutting it out is perfectly OK, but you should have bothered to READ it first! "YOU contrast the studies. If you feel the need to refute the information that I posted, the proper way is to use your own logic backed up by references to reputable sources. You can't simply list or copy the sources and leave the thinking to others. Argue on the basis of research methods and scientific information. You can't simply drown out information that does not fit within your belief system by flooding us with "approved" information, you have to actually tell us where the other idea is wrong. {*filter*} theories are not very impressive; if that is the best you have to offer, don't bother.." Again, you offer your theory of the dental {*filter*}. You did not bother to take the slightest look or make any comment on the science involved. I totally reject that crap. If you want to do something like that and do it right, look into something called a "meta-study". You could draw ALL of the studies on a given subject and within a given time period and compare the way the subject is treated in some objective manner. It is very possible that you could be proven right. That is; you MAY, based on some objective criteria, find some statistically significant differences in the way dentists and MD's handle the identical topic. Until then, the comparison of hand-picked papers that you are offering here is junk-science drivel. {*filter*} theory drivel clipped... Vaughn
|
Mon, 25 Oct 2004 07:22:46 GMT |
|
 |
Ja #12 / 37
|
 Amalgams #1 Source of mercury in people
Quote: >Subject: Re: Amalgams #1 Source of mercury in people?
>Date: 5/8/02 4:22 PM Pacific Daylight Time
>> >Date: 5/8/02 4:32 AM Pacific Daylight Time
>> >http://www.altcorp.com/alzheimers.htm#dental amalgam >> >No, I copied the entire article and it contained no references to crank, >> >anti-amalgam websites. >> Crank? >> I believe thatis an opinion, and yet you say you have no opinion of >mercury >> amalgams. >> Hmmm. >I have an opinion about crank, junk-science websites, regardless of topic.
So you are saying that Dr. Boyd Haley is a crank, and his work is junk-science? Quote: >You don't need them Jan, you have what is between your ears and you have >PubMed. Do it right and perhaps you might actually convince someone.
FYI, PubMed is written by organized medicine and dentistry. Quote: >Jan, you seem to have cut out the below paragraph. Now cutting it out is >perfectly OK, but you should have bothered to READ it first!
I READ it! Quote: >"YOU contrast the studies.
WRONG! I do NOT write the studies. It is done by researchers, MD's scientists and DDS's. I just post it. Quote: >If you feel the need to refute the >information that I posted, the proper way is to use your own logic backed up >by references to reputable sources
I don't need to put it in my own words Vaughn, that's already done. The websites DO have references. What do you consider reputable? Dr Haley at the currect time is the top researcher and you call his work junk science. Have you read any of the long list, he has provided? Quote: >You can't simply list or copy the >sources and leave the thinking to others.
Sure I can! I am just providing the many risks. You should be able to understand that. Quote: > Argue on the basis of research >methods and scientific information.
That's what I provide. Quote: >You can't simply drown out information >that does not fit within your belief system by flooding us with "approved" >information,
That's EXACTLY what those in denial do! Quote: > you have to actually tell us where the other idea is wrong.
I've been doing that now for three years. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink. Quote: >{*filter*} theories are not very impressive;
I'm more interested in truth, than impressions. Quote: >if that is the best you have to >offer, don't bother.."
Point made! Quote: > Again, you offer your theory of the dental {*filter*}. You did not >bother to take the slightest look or make any comment on the science >involved.
Simply wrong. I am getting tired of saying the same things over and over. Quote: >I totally reject that crap.
Point made! Quote: >If you want to do something like >that and do it right, look into something called a "meta-study".
Un huh,,,,,,,,,,you mean ONLY an organized medicine and dentistry study. Quote: >You could >draw ALL of the studies on a given subject and within a given time period >and compare the way the subject is treated in some objective manner.
Translation: Do it MY way,,,,,,,,,,,, So you can say. I don't believe that CRAP. Quote: >It is very possible that you could be proven right.
Yes, that will happen after I'm gone, and how many before me have been met with your very same attitude, it is CRAP. This should have been proven LONG ago! That is; you MAY, based on Quote: >some objective criteria,
find some statistically significant differences in Quote: >the way dentists and MD's handle the identical topic.
That's been done for me! Quote: >Until then, the comparison of hand-picked papers that you are offering here is junk-science >drivel.
Hand picked? I have reported all that is available on the web. I have many many websites, you call ALL of them drivel. What I find strange, is you want to spread the news of the dangers your wife suffers and with VERY good reason, but when I try to warn other suffering people of the risks, THAT I SUFFERED,,,,,,,,,it is drivel. That sucks Vaughn. Jan
|
Mon, 25 Oct 2004 08:49:13 GMT |
|
 |
Vaughn Simo #13 / 37
|
 Amalgams #1 Source of mercury in people
Quote: > >Subject: Re: Amalgams #1 Source of mercury in people?
> >Date: 5/8/02 4:22 PM Pacific Daylight Time > FYI, PubMed is written by organized medicine and dentistry.
More {*filter*} crap. Quote: > >You can't simply drown out information > >that does not fit within your belief system by flooding us with "approved" > >information, > That's EXACTLY what those in denial do!
Go back over your last few posts, that is exactly what YOU have been doing. You have not offered a single idea of your own, you have still not addressed the original article that I posted, you just attempted to drown it out! Quote: > Simply wrong. I am getting tired of saying the same things over and over.
Then address the original article and give up on the {*filter*} stuff. Quote: > Un huh,,,,,,,,,,you mean ONLY an organized medicine and dentistry study.
More {*filter*} crap. Quote: > Hand picked? I have reported all that is available on the web. I have many many > websites, you call ALL of them drivel.
Because they ARE, you do not need them. Use science and that grey stuff between your ears. One good logical point driven home, properly supported by the science, trumps listing a thousand {*filter*}websites. Quote: > What I find strange, is you want to spread the news of the dangers your wife > suffers and with VERY good reason, but when I try to warn other suffering > people of the risks, THAT I SUFFERED,,,,,,,,,it is drivel.
Because you insist on spreading crap. If I shared your concerns about amalgam to the extent that I felt I had to crusade on the Internet, I would want maximum distance from the likes of you. You have negative impact. I have told you many times nicely and not so nicely, you do not listen. If the "Organized dentistry" conspiricy theory is the best you can offer, your back is truly up against the wall and you may as well give it up; there is nothing left. Quote: Poor Jan! Quote: > Jan
Goodnight Jan: Vaughn
|
Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:29:59 GMT |
|
 |
Ja #14 / 37
|
 Amalgams #1 Source of mercury in people
Quote:
>More {*filter*} crap. > give up on the {*filter*} stuff. >More {*filter*} crap. >{*filter*}websites. >Because you insist on spreading crap. > I would >want maximum distance from the likes of you. >you do not >listen. >Poor Jan!
Thanks for the {*filter*}discussion and insults. Jan
|
Mon, 25 Oct 2004 10:03:19 GMT |
|
|
Page 1 of 3
|
[ 37 post ] |
|
Go to page:
[1]
[2] [3] |
|