| Author |
Message |
|
Steven Fawk
#1 / 11
|
 Amalgam lawsuits dismissed As a dentist who hasn't placed an amalgam since 1985, I don't have any
vested interest, but:
New York State Supreme Court Judge William Roy dismissed two
amalgam-related lawsuites against organized dentistry on Feb. 18, 2003.
I wonder why J** didn't tell us?
;-)
Fawks
|
| Sat, 03 Sep 2005 22:49:29 GMT |
|
 |
|
mark freedm
#2 / 11
|
Amalgam lawsuits dismissed Quote:
> As a dentist who hasn't placed an amalgam since 1985, I don't have any > vested interest, but: > New York State Supreme Court Judge William Roy dismissed two
> amalgam-related lawsuites against organized dentistry on Feb. 18, 2003.
> I wonder why J** didn't tell us?
Isn't it OBVIOUS ???? The poor dear is CLEARLY in denial ....
Quote: > ;-)
> Fawks
|
| Sun, 04 Sep 2005 03:49:00 GMT |
|
|
|
Ja
#3 / 11
|
Amalgam lawsuits dismissed Quote: >Subject: Amalgam lawsuits dismissed
>Date: 3/18/03 9:49 AM US Eastern Standard Time
>As a dentist who hasn't placed an amalgam since 1985, I don't have any
>vested interest, but:
>New York State Supreme Court Judge William Roy dismissed two
>amalgam-related lawsuites against organized dentistry on Feb. 18, 2003.
>I wonder why J** didn't tell us?
>;-)
>Fawks
My comments are on MHA, this is an old thread. Jan
|
| Sun, 04 Sep 2005 04:06:02 GMT |
|
|
|
Joel M. Eiche
#4 / 11
|
Amalgam lawsuits dismissed Glad to hear it ....... I have a patient,,,,, sold brakes for a living ,,,,, auto supply business, someone sued him because the brake shoes he sold (not manufactured) contained asbestos! Joel M. Eichen DDS
Quote:
> As a dentist who hasn't placed an amalgam since 1985, I don't have any
> vested interest, but:
> New York State Supreme Court Judge William Roy dismissed two
> amalgam-related lawsuites against organized dentistry on Feb. 18, 2003.
> I wonder why J** didn't tell us?
> ;-)
> Fawks
|
| Sun, 04 Sep 2005 06:29:40 GMT |
|
|
|
Steven Fawk
#5 / 11
|
Amalgam lawsuits dismissed This just happened a few weeks ago.
It's a lot more current than your quotes of Dr. Price from the 20's.
;-)
Fawks
Quote:
> >Subject: Amalgam lawsuits dismissed
> >Date: 3/18/03 9:49 AM US Eastern Standard Time
> >As a dentist who hasn't placed an amalgam since 1985, I don't have any
> >vested interest, but:
> >New York State Supreme Court Judge William Roy dismissed two
> >amalgam-related lawsuites against organized dentistry on Feb. 18, 2003.
> >I wonder why J** didn't tell us?
> >;-)
> >Fawks
> My comments are on MHA, this is an old thread.
> Jan
|
| Sun, 04 Sep 2005 23:07:57 GMT |
|
|
|
Ja
#6 / 11
|
Amalgam lawsuits dismissed Quote: >Subject: Re: Amalgam lawsuits dismissed
>Date: 3/19/03 10:07 AM US Eastern Standard Time
>This just happened a few weeks ago.
>It's a lot more current than your quotes of Dr. Price from the 20's.
>;-)
>Fawks
http://www.testfoundation.org/hglawsuits.htm http://www.alkalizeforhealth.net/Lmercury2.htm
http://www.khorrami.com/Amalgam%20Web/Amalgam/View%20Suits.htm
http://www.nvbt.nl/hot-metalen-amer008.html
http://www.bollesclinic.com/Newsletters/nov_spec2.html
http://www.doctorerickson.com/library%20amalgam%20article.html
http://www.mercola.com/2001/jun/27/mercury_fillings.htm
|
| Mon, 05 Sep 2005 06:12:02 GMT |
|
|
|
Steven Fawk
#7 / 11
|
Amalgam lawsuits dismissed Nice diversion. The truth remains,
Fawks
Quote:
> >This just happened a few weeks ago.
> >It's a lot more current than your quotes of Dr. Price from the 20's.
> >;-)
> >Fawks
|
| Mon, 05 Sep 2005 13:44:04 GMT |
|
|
|
Ja
#8 / 11
|
Amalgam lawsuits dismissed Quote: >Subject: Re: Amalgam lawsuits dismissed
>Date: 3/20/03 12:44 AM US Eastern Standard Time
>Nice diversion.
Nope, just the facts. Quote: >The truth remains, >Fawks
It certainly does. Some are very slow seeing it, therefore, they will be forced.
http://www.toxicteeth.net
Quote:
>> >This just happened a few weeks ago.
>> >It's a lot more current than your quotes of Dr. Price from the 20's.
>> >;-)
>> >Fawks
|
| Mon, 05 Sep 2005 14:36:03 GMT |
|
|
|
Steven Fawk
#9 / 11
|
Amalgam lawsuits dismissed Interesting (though quite ridiculous) comment.
Fawks
Quote:
> Some are very slow seeing it, therefore, they will be forced.
|
| Tue, 06 Sep 2005 23:24:33 GMT |
|
|
|
Ja
#10 / 11
|
Amalgam lawsuits dismissed Quote: >Subject: Re: Amalgam lawsuits dismissed
>Date: 3/21/03 10:24 AM US Eastern Standard Time
>Interesting (though quite ridiculous) comment.
>Fawks
>> Some are very slow seeing it, therefore, they will be forced.
http://www.toxicteeth.net This is the month: KHORRAMI WINS PROPOSITION 65 CASE ***FORCING*** DENTISTS TO
DISCLOSE HEALTH RISKS OF MERCURY FILLINGS!
|
| Wed, 07 Sep 2005 00:43:24 GMT |
|
|
|
Joel M. Eiche
#11 / 11
|
Amalgam lawsuits dismissed Jan Drew will sit on those who refuse to be forced ...... Quote:
> Interesting (though quite ridiculous) comment.
> Fawks
> > Some are very slow seeing it, therefore, they will be forced.
|
| Wed, 07 Sep 2005 02:59:45 GMT |
|
| |
