Nutrient fluoride? (was Re: fluoride allergy)
Author |
Message |
Brian Sandl #1 / 22
|
 Nutrient fluoride? (was Re: fluoride allergy)
:>>[...] :>>: :>>: The problem is that flouride is being used to solve a problem that :is :>>: acknowledged to be caused by malnutrition. (i.e. bad diet in :general, :*not* :>>: one lacking in flouride) Flouride is, at best, a band-aid :solution, that :>>: lets people eat trash and keep their teeth intact, flourosis or no. : :And that's the thrust of it. Good response Stuart. Maybe if we taxed :junk cooking.net">food like they do cigarettes and {*filter*}, we might get somewhere. : :stuff edited : :>>But I ask if you can name a study in which animals have attained :health :>>with the fluoride chemically removed from their diet. :>>
: :Brian we have discussed this before. You didn't seem to get the :message, so now I'll repeat it in public. Yes, I remember you emailed me after I said how mature plaque concentrates magnesium and fluoride on the tooth surface. I was quoting Ritchie who says that lots of dietary fluoride is not such a factor in the health of teeth which have a mature plaque, because the plaque can absorb it from very low levels in the saliva. But you didn't want fluoride to play any part at all, not even the smaller amount which Ritchie properly plaqued teeth can cope with. And we haven't yet completed our plaque argument. You say there won't be any because of toothpaste, I remember. I am asking whether it is better to take some care with the plaque, then not have to worry so much about fluoride and sugar in the diet. You and Stuart advise putting lots of care into eating certain foods, but you are not willing to say take care of the protective layer on the tooth surface. Of course it is possible to adjust dietarily to other lacks and toxins sometimes, but sometimes it is a great problem. :Fluoride has nothing to do with "health" :and is not an essential nutrient. In 1971, the National Academy of :Sciences noted the following about essentiality of substances in their :report on fluoride: :"First, it should be possible to demonstrate repeated and significant :responses in growth or health to dietary supplements of the element and :to the element alone; Sorry but what about putting the correct dosage into that equation. :second, it should be possible to develop a :deficiency state on diets that lack the element but that are otherwise :adequate and satisfactory. Such diets should contain all other known :dietary essentials in adequate amounts." That is asking quite a lot. Also it is not taking account of toxins which the body might have to deal with. Selenium is one example of an essential nutrient which it is very easy to overdose into toxicity. In China deficiency and dietary excess both occur in different regions. Cadmium is a toxic substance sometimes in food. :They also stated that "Unequivocal evidence that fluorides perform any :vital function in animals has not yet been produced." I might add, :that it still hasn't. :You asked for studies. Yes there are some. Drs. Maurer and Day, from :the Department of Chemistry at Indiana University in Bloomington (don't :have the study. I imagine it's available because the Academy used this :study) pointed out: :"Under the extremely rigorous conditions of this study, fluorine was :not :found to have any influence on the growth and well-being of rats. There :were not even grossly detectable dental defects. Were the teeth surfaces of the rats challenged? :Thus it is jutifiable :to conslude that under some conditions, fluorine may not have any value :in nutrition or even in the maintenance of dental health." With fluoride it is hoped that a wider range of conditions can be adjusted to. Even abrasive toothpaste, perhaps. I agree with taking risk out of the environment. But to leave children suffering for a matter of principle does not appear fair. :Another one used by the Academy is by Dr. A.R. Doberenz and other :researchers at the University of Arizona in Tucson-- no detectable :differences in general health or growth rate between fluoridated and :non-fluoridated rats. A similar study was done on mice with the same :results. Again, you might try Medline. :Since that time, as far as I know, only two studies have claimed that :fluoride is an essential nutrient; both have been thoroughly :discredited :and have not been replicated by others. In one of these studies, the :original researchers had skimped on a very important constituent -- :sufficient iron. I have to look into iron. Ferrous iron tonic can be very erosive to teeth. Some men do {*filter*} doning to reduce their iron to reduce risk of heart trouble. I feel that nutrients need to be in balance rather than trying to make one, say iron, take over some of another's function. :When subsequent researchers rectified this, the original :results pointing to fluoride essentiality disappeared. And perhaps the iron deficiency could have been reduced with extra vitamin C. But vitamin C in very large doses can impair copper levels. Perhaps it can even take over some of the function of copper, I am not certain. Copper is in the respiratory enzyme ceruloplasmin. :Regarding the oft-repeated claim by many proponents that fluoride :reduces :tooth decay and therefore is a nutrient, the Academy points out: "That :in :itself is no indication of fluorine essentiality, inasmuch as caries :incidence depends on many factors, and many persons with perfectly :sound :dentition have had only minimal exposure to fluoride." That was Ritchie's point, with the mature plaque. :On the other end of the scale, there are now numerous studies which :show :that fluoride interferes with many enzymes, reproduction, {*filter*} :motility, :etc. etc. :Can we put this to rest now Brian? Neither people nor animals "need" :fluoride to attain HEALTH. If I'm wrong and it is necessary, it's in :such :minute quantites that no scientific study could ever be designed to :test :for it because fluoride is so ubiquitous. One of the two studies I :mentioned above used double distilled water through four generations of :rats and a diet which contained about 0.007 parts per million fluoride. : :The second was even lower in F- content. :Regards, Elke I think there would be quite a lot of fluoride in composite dental fillings, probably ytterbium fluoride.;)- But remember, both you and I hope to get by without fluoride supplementation. There may be other factors which cannot be avoided, then it may be necessary to supplement.
The citations and abstracts below were taken from Biological Abstracts on CD-ROM, produced by BIOSIS, the world's largest abstracting and indexing company in the life sciences. BIOSIS produces over 500,000 citations per year from journals, meetings, books, and patents. Although BIOSIS makes a diligent effort to provide a complete and accurate representation of bioscientific and other literature, BIOSIS does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy, or completeness of any information. For more information, contact BIOSIS at 2100 Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA 19013, USA; telephone 1-800-523-4806 (U.S. and Canada), (215)587-4847 (Worldwide); World Wide Web URL: http://www.***.com/ ; Internet e-mail:
TI: Dietary modulation of the symptoms of cadmium toxicity in rats: Effects of vitamins A,C,D,D hormone, and fluoride. AU: PLESANTS-E-W; WASLIEN-C; NAUGHTON-B-A SO: NUTRITION RESEARCH 13(7): 839-850 PY: 1993 LA: English AB: The effects of vitamins A, C, D, and D hormone (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D-3), and fluoride and combinations of these micronutrients on the toxic symptoms of young rats exposed to 80 ppm cadmium (Cd-2+) in the drinking water and fed a modified AIN-76 diet were studied for 14 weeks. Cd-2+ treated rats displayed smaller body weight gains and larger relative kidney and testis weights than controls. Treatment of Cd-2+ exposed rats with vitamins A or D ameliorated these symptoms. When combined, these two vitamins were synergistic in this protection as was the combination of vitamin A and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D-3. Animals exposed to Cd-2+ and treated with vitamin A or a combination of A and D had lower femur dry weights than rats exposed to Cd-2+ alone but this effect was not seen with the combination of vitamin A and 1,25-dihyroxyvitamin D. Vitamin C had no protective action on the kidneys or testes but caused an increase in the dry weight of the femurs of the exposed rats. Fluoride partially reduced the weight depression of the Cd-2+ exposed rats at certain time periods and lowered the relative weights of the testes in these animals. Fluoride, in combination with 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D-3, significantly increased the dry and mineral (ash) weights of the femurs of the Cd-2+ exposed rats above that of the controls, a finding which may be relevant to the treatment of osteoporsis. Exposure of rats of Cd-2+ significantly depressed the hematocrits and erythrocyte counts and altered the ratio of granuloid to mononuclear peripheral leukocytes. Treatment of Cd-2+ exposed rats with either vitamin A and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D-3 or vitamins A and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D-3 and fluoride appeared to lessen the hematotoxicity associated with Cd-2+ exposure. TI: Effect of dietary fluoride on selenite toxicity in the rat. AU: YU-Q; CERKLEWSKI-F-L; WHANGER-P-D; HEDSTROM-O; RIDLINGTON-J-W SO: BIOLOGICAL TRACE ELEMENT RESEARCH 34(3): 265-278 PY: 1992 LA: English AB: Three factorial experiments were conducted to determine if high dietary fluoride (F) would inhibit selenite toxicity in rats. Initially, three levels of selenite (0.05, 3, and 5 mg/kg diet) were matched against three levels of F (2, 75, and 150 mg/kg diet). Fluoride failed to prevent the depressive effect of selenite on 8-wk cooking.net">food intake and body wt gain. Selenium (Se) concentration of
... read more »
|
Sun, 10 May 1998 03:00:00 GMT |
|
 |
Carolko #2 / 22
|
 Nutrient fluoride? (was Re: fluoride allergy)
In article
Quote:
>With fluoride it is hoped that a wider range of conditions can be >adjusted to. Even abrasive toothpaste, perhaps. I agree with taking risk >out of the environment. But to leave children suffering for a matter of >principle does not appear fair.
I believe children are suffering because of the principles of dentists. Dentists refuse to acknowledge the harm that some people receive from fluoride. They always talk about the teeth. What is fluoride doing to the body. It's absolutely scary to me that individual dentists have so little knowledege of fluoride's side effects. I guess that helps them influence legislators to force fluoride on all of us. Maybe dentists have to learn to question authority instead of picking on us. Fluoridation gave organized dentistry prestige and power. I don't think their ready to give that up. Quote: >Selenium is one example of an essential nutrient which it is very easy >to overdose into toxicity. In China deficiency and dietary excess both
occur in >different regions. Cadmium is a toxic substance sometimes in food. But selenium and cadmium aren't poured into the nation's water supply. Fluoride is. Almost every other drug dosage is based on many factors like age, body weight, allergies or intolerances and need. Not fluoride - just put it in the water. Put it in the elderly. Put it in diabetics. Put it into cancer patients. Put it into infants. (who even dentists say should have none). Put it into people with impaired immune systems. Put it into the allergic. This is the method dentists proscribe to deliver1 milligram fluoride daily to children while their teeth are developing. Carol Kopf
|
Sun, 10 May 1998 03:00:00 GMT |
|
 |
Brian Sand #3 / 22
|
 Nutrient fluoride? (was Re: fluoride allergy)
: In article
: : >With fluoride it is hoped that a wider range of conditions can be : >adjusted to. Even abrasive toothpaste, perhaps. I agree with taking risk : >out of the environment. But to leave children suffering for a matter of : >principle does not appear fair. : : I believe children are suffering because of the principles of dentists. : Dentists refuse to acknowledge the harm that some people receive from : fluoride. They always talk about the teeth. What is fluoride doing to : the body. : It's absolutely scary to me that individual dentists have so little : knowledege of fluoride's side effects. I guess that helps them influence : legislators to force fluoride on all of us. Maybe dentists have to learn : to question authority instead of picking on us. Fluoridation gave : organized dentistry prestige and power. I don't think their ready to : give that up. There are many medical treatments which are not sufficiently adjusted to the individual. Is there a a test for possible penicillin anaphyllactic shock yet? So often we need more diagnosis as to what treatment is going to work for a particular biochemistry. I am sure better methods than trial and error could be produced with todays science. So I shall start by asking you, "What other characteristics of a person('s biochemistry) might point to a risk of living in a high fluoride area, or eating high fluoride imported food?" : : >Selenium is one example of an essential nutrient which it is very easy : >to overdose into toxicity. In China deficiency and dietary excess both : occur in >different regions. Cadmium is a toxic substance sometimes in : food. : : But selenium and cadmium aren't poured into the nation's water supply. : Fluoride is. I mentioned those two because, from the abstracts I presented, it seems that fluoride may help to protect the body from excess of those two. Elke had said that there is no known need for fluoride in a proper diet. I offer those little pieces of evidence to suggest that there may be a possibility that fluoride could take away some of the toxic load when the diet is not proper, as it is very easy for it to be. Almost every other drug dosage is based on many factors : like age, body weight, allergies or intolerances and need. To some extent, though usually allergies are found by trial and error. Not fluoride - : just put it in the water. Put it in the elderly. Put it in diabetics. : Put it into cancer patients. : Put it into infants. (who even dentists say should have none). Yes, what is being done to label infant milk formulae with that risk, perhaps to make different fluoride levels of it so that it can be prepared in fluoridated water? Often baby foods are prepared in a district with fluoridation. Levels can get too high. Put it : into people with impaired immune systems. Put it into the allergic. This : is the method dentists proscribe to deliver1 milligram fluoride daily to : children while their teeth are developing. : : Carol Kopf
|
Mon, 11 May 1998 03:00:00 GMT |
|
 |
Carolko #4 / 22
|
 Nutrient fluoride? (was Re: fluoride allergy)
Quote: Brian Sandle writes: >"What other characteristics of a person's biochemistry might point to a
rishof living in a high fluoride area, or eating high fluoride imported food. First of all, your premise is illogical. Tooth decay is not a contagious life-threatening disease. So there is no need to compare fluoride to penicillin. But to play your game - fluoride sould be contraindicated for people who display outward signs of fluoride poisoning (dental fluorosis), the allergic, diabetic, kidney patients, athletes, laborers, dieters, and others who drink large amounts of water, people with impaired immune systems, cancer patients, arthritics, people with osteoporosis and anyone who wants to avoid the above disorders. Quote: >it sems that fluoride may help to protect the body from excess of those
two (selenium and cadmium) That's like fighting fire with fire. I know that calcium, Vitamin C and D help wash fluoride out of the body and they nourish the body, too. Selenium is an antioxidant that has been proven to be a cancer preventative. Most people don't get enough of it. If what you're saying is right - that fluoride washes selenium out of the body - I guess you can add "the selenium deficient" to my above list of people who should avoid fluoride. I think the best thing to do is write your local legislators. Tell them to stop putting fluoride into your water, cooking.net">food chain and body. Let each individual decide the amount of fluoride they want or need. Carol Kopf
|
Wed, 13 May 1998 03:00:00 GMT |
|
 |
Carolko #5 / 22
|
 Nutrient fluoride? (was Re: fluoride allergy)
Quote: Sandle) writes: >"What other characteristics of a person('s biochemistry) >might point to a risk of living in a high fluoride area, or eating high >fluoride imported food?"
First of all, your premise is illogical. Why do you need a magic bullet that will eliminate tooth decay, when almost any reputable dental professional will tell you, fluoride can't do much for someone who consumes a horrible diet. But to play your game - flouride should be contraindicated for people who display outward signs of fluoride poisoning (dental fluorosis), the allergic, diabetic, kidney patients, athletes, laborers, dieters, and others who drink large amounts of water, people with impaired immune systems, cancer patients, arthritics, people with osteoporosis and anyone who wants to avoid the above disorders. Quote: >it seems that fluoride may hlep to protect the body from excess of those
two (selenium and cadmium) That's like fighting fire with fire. I know that calcium, Vitamin C and D help wash fluoride out of the body and they nourish the body. Selenium is an antioxidant that has been proven to be a cancer preventative. Most people don't get enough of it. If what you're saying is right - that fluoride washes selenium out of the body - I guess you can add "the selenium deficient" to my above list. About labeling baby formual. In the 70's, there was a law that baby formual had to have the fluoride filtered out from its water source (but I know rules change). I think the best thing to do is write your local legislators. Tell them to stop putting fluoride into the water. Let each individual decide the amount of fluoride they want - if any. Carol Kopf
|
Thu, 14 May 1998 03:00:00 GMT |
|
 |
Michael J. Layton, D.D. #6 / 22
|
 Nutrient fluoride? (was Re: fluoride allergy)
Quote:
> First of all, your premise is illogical. Tooth decay is not a contagious > life-threatening disease. So there is no need to compare fluoride to > penicillin.
Sorry to interrupt, but dental caries is contagious. In fact, it is the most prevalent infectious disease in the world. In addition, it can be life threatening. There are many documented case of people dying from infections of dental origin. (Fortunately, we have {*filter*} like penicillin) Mike -- Michael J. Layton, D.D.S. Truro, N.S.
|
Thu, 14 May 1998 03:00:00 GMT |
|
 |
Michael J. Layton, D.D. #7 / 22
|
 Nutrient fluoride? (was Re: fluoride allergy)
The level of fluoride in drinking water is NOT high enough to cause fluorosis. Fluorosis is caused by children receiving unnecessary fluoride supplements and/or ingesting fluoride when brushing teeth with huge globs of toothpaste. If anyone thinks that the dental profession is pushing fluoridation with no scientific basis to gain "prestige and power" (whatever that means) I suggest you contact your local dental association. I'm sure they can provide you with hundreds of scientific studies. As for the argument that we should let people decide for themselves whether they want to ingest fluoride, how is the average Joe supposed to know anything about what amount of fluoride is good/bad? That's what the health professions are for. Maybe we should stop the addition of vitamin D to the milk supply. We'll just let everyone decide for themselves how much they need to prevent Rickets. (...assuming that everyone even knows what it is.) Having said all this, I don't believe that the fluoridation of water is all that important anymore. However, the decision to remove it from the water supply will likely be based on the fact that it is no longer necessary, not because we are all dying a slow horrible death from fluorosis. And by the way, I don't have any studies in front of me, so don't ask for any references.... this is my professional opinion only. -- Michael J. Layton, D.D.S. Truro, N.S.
|
Thu, 14 May 1998 03:00:00 GMT |
|
 |
Carolko #8 / 22
|
 Nutrient fluoride? (was Re: fluoride allergy)
Quote: Mike Layton writes: >I don't have any studies in front of me, so don't ask for any >references...this is my professional opinion only.
You've been mislead. Ask the American Dental Association for proof that fluoridation is safe. Don't just take their word for it. Quote: >I suggest you contact your local dental association. I'm sure they >can
provide you with hundreds of scientific studies.) I have. They can't. Quote: >The level of fluoride in drinking water is not high enough to cause >fluorosis.
Read your journals. Quote: >How is the average Joe supposed to know anything about what >amount of
fluoride is good/bad That's why you shouldn't put fluoride into Joe's water. Joe doesn't know: . he gets fluoride in his pasta boiled with fluoridated water, . he gets fluoride in most of the beverages he cosumes that are bottled in fluoridated areas, . he gets extra amounts of fluoride in his tea because boiling condenses the amount of fluoride in one cup and tea has natural fluoride in it already . he gets fluoride from his cold mist humidifier using fluoridated water . He inhales fluoride in the shower . If Joe lives near the ocean, Joe gets fluoride from ocean mist. . Fluoride is a component of acid rain and volcanic eruptions (Joe and the volcano - too much fluoride) . Joe drinks two gallons of water a day because he's a runner. Doctors tell him lots and lots of water; it's good for him. Did they tell him to drink bottled water? Poor Joe. Give him a break. Take fluoride out of his water. "That's what the health professions are for," - to protect us? Carol Kopf
|
Fri, 15 May 1998 03:00:00 GMT |
|
 |
Brian Sand #9 / 22
|
 Nutrient fluoride? (was Re: fluoride allergy)
Quote: : Sandle) writes:
: : >"What other characteristics of a person('s biochemistry) : >might point to a risk of living in a high fluoride area, or eating high : >fluoride imported food?" : : First of all, your premise is illogical. Why do you need a magic bullet : that will eliminate tooth decay, when almost any reputable dental : professional will tell you, fluoride can't do much for someone who : consumes a horrible diet. But there may be some people on borderline diets who are doing their best. Though you know I do not promote fluoridation of the water supply. All you seem to be concerned with is stopping fluoridation. If you were genuinely concerned with health you would try to help those who cannot cope with or manipulate their current fluoride dietary budget. Get a cost estimate and charge it up to the fluoridaters, from what they save on smaller dentistry payments. : : But to play your game - flouride should be contraindicated for people who : display outward signs of fluoride poisoning (dental fluorosis), the : allergic, diabetic, kidney patients, athletes, laborers, dieters, and : others who drink large amounts of water, people with impaired immune : systems, cancer patients, arthritics, people with osteoporosis and anyone : who wants to avoid the above disorders. Therefore, start to do a proper budget about this. Monetary budget and biochemical budget. Charge it. : : >it seems that fluoride may hlep to protect the body from excess of those : two (selenium and cadmium) : : That's like fighting fire with fire. I know that calcium, Vitamin C and D : help wash fluoride out of the body and they nourish the body. Selenium is : an antioxidant that has been proven to be a cancer preventative. Most : people don't get enough of it. If what you're saying is right - that : fluoride washes selenium out of the body - I guess you can add "the : selenium deficient" to my above list. : It appears that very high levels of fluoride did reduce very high levels of selenite, but the protection at more relevant levels was not by lowering the level of selenium. Please read again: The citations and abstracts below were taken from Biological Abstracts on CD-ROM, produced by BIOSIS, the world's largest abstracting and indexing company in the life sciences. BIOSIS produces over 500,000 citations per year from journals, meetings, books, and patents. Although BIOSIS makes a diligent effort to provide a complete and accurate representation of bioscientific and other literature, BIOSIS does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy, or completeness of any information. For more information, contact BIOSIS at 2100 Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA 19013, USA; telephone 1-800-523-4806 (U.S. and Canada), (215)587-4847 (Worldwide); World Wide Web URL: http://www.***.com/ ; Internet e-mail:
TI: Effect of dietary fluoride on selenite toxicity in the rat. AU: YU-Q; CERKLEWSKI-F-L; WHANGER-P-D; HEDSTROM-O; RIDLINGTON-J-W SO: BIOLOGICAL TRACE ELEMENT RESEARCH 34(3): 265-278 PY: 1992 LA: English AB: Three factorial experiments were conducted to determine if high dietary fluoride (F) would inhibit selenite toxicity in rats. Initially, three levels of selenite (0.05, 3, and 5 mg/kg diet) were matched against three levels of F (2, 75, and 150 mg/kg diet). Fluoride failed to prevent the depressive effect of selenite on 8-wk cooking.net">food intake and body wt gain. Selenium (Se) concentration of plasma and kidney and enzymatic activity of whole {*filter*} glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) were also unaffected by F. Liver Se concentration, however, was slightly (12%) but significantly (p lt 0.05) reduced when the highest F and Se levels were combined. Fluoride (150 mg/kg) appeared to reduce liver selenite toxicity (5 mg/kg). Therefore, further study focussed on liver histology with treatments that eliminated the middle levels of selenite and F. Fluoride prevented the hepatic necrosis seen in selenite-toxic rats. Similar histological lesions were not observed for kidney or heart. Fluoride partially (26%) but significantly (p lt 0.025) reduced thiobarbituric-reactive substances in selenite-toxic rats, but there was no F effect on intracellular distribution of liver Se, glutathione levels and kidney, or on liver xanthine oxidase activity. Overall, the protective effect of F on selenite toxicity appears to be confirmed to liver pathology. The exact mechanism for this effect, however, remains unclear. What I hope is that people's individual biochemical needs can be met for nutrients. Babiuk is trying to say that there is no need for fluoride. I suggest that for some people it may be part of a sensible toxicity trade off. Let us budget properly. Truck in relevant fluoride/chlorine/whatever free bath water for the needy, if bathing is indeed proven good. Does it not cost minerals from the needy body? Budget again. : About labeling baby formual. In the 70's, there was a law that baby : formual had to have the fluoride filtered out from its water source (but I : know rules change). : : I think the best thing to do is write your local legislators. Tell them : to stop putting fluoride into the water. Let each individual decide the : amount of fluoride they want - if any. Some may choose wisely. There are also arguments that safe drivers should be allowed to drive faster, police etc. But you can't leave it up to individual people in general to know their needs and capabilities. Only the educated minority can do that. Not the politicised majority. : Carol Kopf
|
Fri, 15 May 1998 03:00:00 GMT |
|
 |
Carolko #10 / 22
|
 Nutrient fluoride? (was Re: fluoride allergy)
Michael J. Layton, D.D.S. writes: Quote: > dental caries is contagious.
That's a new one to me. Quote: >In fact, it is the most prevalent infectious disease in the world. In >addition, it can be life threatening. There are many documented >case of
people dying from infections of dental origin. (Fortunately, >we have {*filter*} like penicillin) Are you saying that fluoride would prevent a cavity that's become infected enough to cause death? Would fluoride cure this? I think most dental professionals would agree that no amount of fluoride would save a person who's immune system is so compromised and who's health is obviously very poor.. Penicillin might save him but fluoride won't. Carol Kopf
|
Sat, 16 May 1998 03:00:00 GMT |
|
 |
Brian Sand #11 / 22
|
 Nutrient fluoride? (was Re: fluoride allergy)
Subject: Fluoride activated and inhibited biochemistry (Was: Re: Nutrient fluoride? (was Re: fluoride allergy)) Newsgroups: sci.med.dentistry
Distribution: Quote:
: Brian Sandle writes:
: : >But there may be some people on borderline diets who are doing t>heir : >best. Though you know I do not promote fluoridation of the water >supply. : : >.All you seem to be concerned with is stopping fluoridation. If you >were : : >genuinely concerned with health you would try to help those who >cannot : >cope with or manipulate their current fluoride dietary budget. Get a : >cost : >estimate and charge it up to the fluoridaters, from what they save on : : I'd rather and I do contribute to services that feed the poor. This helps : their teeth and their bodies. I'd never knowingly subsidize fluoride : supplementation to children. Also you might comment on my long article Ritchie & abrasive toothpaste decay (Was: Re: Fluoride) : : The New York State Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation has investigated the : cost of providing fluoride tablets to the poor in an effort to produce : some sort of compromise. What would you say about putting calcium fluoride in grain products? : It's cost is a minute fraction of water : fluoridation. The "fluoridators" are not interested. They know the poor wouldn't take them. : We are still uncomfortable with this compromise because a bottle of : fluoride tablets could kill a toddler if ingested all at once. I don't think so. Even 400 tablets of 1.1 mg Sodium Fluoride (those to be used in areas where the water fluoride level is less than 0.3 parts per million) would have a total fluoride dose of around 200 mg. Would a single dose of that figure kill a toddler? And these days toddler-proof containers are available for the many toxic substances in the household. : : It is very hard for us to come to a compromise because we know so strongly : that fluoride is harmful to children. In order for a body to regulate itself inhibiting as well as activation of metabolic processes is needed. An old book "Handbook of Vitamins, Minerals and Hormones" Roman J.Kutsky (1981) says: System Organ Metalloenzyme/Protein Cofactors System Function Types_______________________________________________________________________ Cofactors Tissues Amylase Mg,Ca,F Carbohydrase (F-) Fat cells Adenyl cyclase F, Mg Cyclic AMP production Cofactor Nerves Cholinesterase Ca, Mg, Esterase inhibitors Co, Mn (F-) {*filter*} Hyaluronidase Fe, Mn Carbohydrase Leukocytes Enolase Mg,Mn,Zn Glycolisis Liver Uricase Mn,Cu Purine Metabolism Tissues Phosphoglucomutase Mg Transphosphatase Pancreas DNA nucleases Mg,MN,Ca DNA digestion Pancreas Ribonuclease ? RNA digestion Tissues Acid phosphatase ? Phosphate removal Tissues Pyrophophatase II Mg,Mn Pyrophosphate splitting The book also says that it increases wound healing and prevents soft tissue calcification. Too much kills, but I wonder how the FDA say it is not essential (according to Babiuk). Must look for their comments on some of the above. Lethal limit given as 2000 mg/day. : I'll assume putting my name at the bottom of your post was an error. : : Carol Kopf Sorry, I should have put mine in. I often leave the other signature there as a reminder to whom the reply was to. It's common practice.
|
Mon, 18 May 1998 03:00:00 GMT |
|
 |
Michael J. Layton, D.D. #12 / 22
|
 Nutrient fluoride? (was Re: fluoride allergy)
Quote:
> You've been mislead. Ask the American Dental Association for proof that > fluoridation is safe. Don't just take their word for it.
There is no way for anyone to prove that anything is "safe" Sure, maybe fluoride ingested at 1ppm over 80 years will decrease your life by 5 minutes. How can anyone prove that it won't? I haven't been mislead by anyone, especially the ADA since I live in Canada. The studies I read in school showed no evidence that fluoride was harmful at 1ppm. And yes, I did read articles by guys who said that fluoride causes cancer. Their methods were suspect at best. Quote: > >I suggest you contact your local dental association. I'm sure they >can > provide you with hundreds of scientific studies.) > I have. They can't.
Here's someone you might try. Dr. Amid Ismail at the Faculty of Dentistry at Dalhousie University in Halifax, NS, Canada. He has done studies of his own on water fluoridation. I'm sure he has tonnes of articles on the subject.(Not studies of the dangers of fluoride, but the efficacy of fluoride in preventing tooth decay.Incidently, he found no evidence that fluoridation was necessary in my town where the water is currently non fluoridated.) Quote: > >The level of fluoride in drinking water is not high enough to cause > >fluorosis. > Read your journals.
I have, and I still say that children with fluorosis get it from fluoride supplements and from gulping their toothpaste. Quote: > >How is the average Joe supposed to know anything about what >amount of > fluoride is good/bad > That's why you shouldn't put fluoride into Joe's water. Joe doesn't know:
If that's your rational, why don't we put Joe on an island where doctors can't impose their educated, professional opinions on him. He won't know that sunburns, smoking, drinking, cholesterol and drug abuse will kill him, but at least it will be his own (ignorant) decision. BTW let me stress that I am not an advocate of water fluoridation. I just don't believe it to be the evil poison that you are making it out to be. Also, are you suggesting that topical application of fluoride in the dental office should be banned as well? Mike p.s. If you are so concerned about poisons of dental origin, I believe that silver amalgams are the soapbox topic at the moment. :) -- Michael J. Layton, D.D.S. Truro, N.S.
|
Mon, 18 May 1998 03:00:00 GMT |
|
 |
Carolko #13 / 22
|
 Nutrient fluoride? (was Re: fluoride allergy)
Quote: >There is no way for anyone to prove that anything is "safe"
The burden of proof is on the shoulders of those who fluoridate. If fluoridation can't be proven safe, it must be stopped. Quote: >BTW let me stress that I am not an advocate of water fluoridation.
Do you just like to argue? There are various reasons why people oppose fluoridation: . freedom of choice . mass medication without individual consent . government forcing something we don't all need . fluoride makes some people ill . fluoride may make some people ill . it wastes tax money Do you expend as much energy telling those who push fluoridation that it is wrong. Maybe, if you did and we worked together to stop fluoridation, I wouldn't be here "littering" your dental newsgroup with fluoride messages (well, maybe occassionally.) Would you rather argue or would you rather do the right thing? Quote: >Also, are you suggesting that topical application of fluoride in the >dental office should be banned as well?
Me and my family wouldn't use fluoride in any form. I wouldn't stop those who choose to have it. This is America. We're supposed to have freedom of choice. There are many {*filter*} I don't take that others consume freely. Quote: >P.S. If you are so concerned about poisons of dental origin, I believe >that silver amalgams are the soapbox topic at the moment
I go to a dentist who doesn't do fluoride or mercury. When they put silver amalgams in the water, then I'll get cranky. Carol Kopf
|
Tue, 19 May 1998 03:00:00 GMT |
|
 |
Michael J. Layton, D.D. #14 / 22
|
 Nutrient fluoride? (was Re: fluoride allergy)
Quote:
> Michael J. Layton, D.D.S. writes: > > dental caries is contagious. > That's a new one to me. > >In fact, it is the most prevalent infectious disease in the world. In > >addition, it can be life threatening. There are many documented >case of > people dying from infections of dental origin. (Fortunately, >we have > {*filter*} like penicillin) > Are you saying that fluoride would prevent a cavity that's become infected > enough to cause death? Would fluoride cure this? > I think most dental professionals would agree that no amount of fluoride > would save a person who's immune system is so compromised and who's health > is obviously very poor.. Penicillin might save him but fluoride won't. > Carol Kopf
I didn't mean to imply (in fact I didn't imply, you inferred that I implied) that fluoride can reverse caries in a tooth (It may reverse early demineralization). I was only saying that caries is a contagious disease. You cannot have carious teeth unless you carry S. mutans in your mouth and these bacteria do not colonate children until their teeth come in. Children usually get the bacteria from contact with thrir mother. Also, you don't need a compromised immune system or poor health to get an abscessed tooth. Infections from teeth can spread very rapidly through veins in the face to the veins in the brain. This is rare, but it does happen. My original post in this thread was not intended to relate to fluoride. Mike -- Michael J. Layton, D.D.S. Truro, N.S.
|
Wed, 20 May 1998 03:00:00 GMT |
|
 |
Michael J. Layton, D.D. #15 / 22
|
 Nutrient fluoride? (was Re: fluoride allergy)
Quote: > Do you just like to argue? There are various reasons why people oppose > fluoridation:
I am responding to posts in this newsgroup that I believe are misleading. There may be a link between fluoride and cancer and there may not be. As of right now, there is no proven link.I think the whole issue has been blown out of proportion. After all, fluoride has been used for years. This is not thalidimide we're handing out after all. There can be no argument that fluoride, in certain circumstances, is a significant benefit to teeth. That's why dentists use fluoride gels, fluoride varnishes, and cements that release fluoride. Mike -- Michael J. Layton, D.D.S. Truro, N.S.
|
Fri, 22 May 1998 03:00:00 GMT |
|
|
Page 1 of 2
|
[ 22 post ] |
|
Go to page:
[1]
[2] |
|