Litigation 101 
Author Message
 Litigation 101

This is how Ilena Rosenthal got sued!

She quotes without reading the article!



Subject: MCS and poisoning by dental amalgam
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 23:42:09 GMT
Organization: Humantics Foundation for Women

http://www.***.com/ ~stoll/archives/mercury/15063.html

MCS and poisoning by dental amalgam
Posted by Mai on May 31, 1999 at 20:35:44:

Posted from [] by way of []
via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.***.com/

Sat, 04 Oct 2003 18:49:46 GMT
 Litigation 101
Joel ...

We realize that in your eyes the Plaintiffs in this SLAPP suit are Medical
Deities ...

It further appears that because they filed suit, you believe it has merit.

From your responses on this topic, it appears you understand zippppo, nada
about the First Amendment ...

why in the world you believe I am guilty of anythng from posting this,
makes no sense whatsoever.

Hard as it may be for you and the litigious Plaintiffs in this case to
believe ... yours are not the only opinions that matter.

Get over yourself Joel.

**This is how Ilena Rosenthal got sued!
**She quotes without reading the article!


Now we come to a very touchy subject. In the field of health care, there
is a very bad tendency to call any form of health care we do not
understand, quackery. Because of licensing laws, most Americans have been
exposed to only one form of medicine. They have been taught that this form
of healing is "scientifically proven" while other forms of healing are
not. There are many orthodox physicians and laymen alike who consider
herbology, naturopathy, homeopathy, acupuncture, massage therapy and other
"alternative" forms of therapy to be quackery. Even nutrition is commonly
considered a "quack" form of therapy as noted by the late Dr. Robert
Mendelsohn, M.D.

If you look at almost any other system of medicine besides the Western,
you'll find a heavy reliance on food. The "food" of Modern Medicine,
however, is the drug. The American doctor, aside from a very fragmentary
and usually incorrect approach to certain "therapeutic diets" completely
disregards nutrition. Those who are concerned with nutrition are labeled
faddists, freaks, extremists, radicals, and quacks...1

Sun, 05 Oct 2003 05:53:39 GMT
 [ 2 post ] 

 Relevant Pages 

1. New Adiposity 101

2. Adiposity 101

3. Obesity research dollars (was Adiposity 101)

4. Andiposity 101

5. Fever (> 101 F) and pregnancy

6. Need Adiposity 101 article

7. Correction to Adiposity 101

8. formula 101

9. Adiposity 101 4/4

10. Adiposty 101

11. Adiposty 101 updated

12. DC/ Asthma/Bronchial Physiology 101 again!

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software