O/T - Response to "Anonymous" 
Author Message
 O/T - Response to "Anonymous"

Well, no surprise here - but "somebody" has been sending me anonymous
e-mails regarding Dr. Chung.  Now I normally trash e-mails from folks
who are so gutless that they hide behind their mothers' skirts by
using anonymizers and the like - but this particular one was so
pitiful in the ignorance the author displayed that it bordered on
entertaining.  So I thought I'd share it with you along with my
responses...

****************

Quote:

>Subject: You owe Dr. Chung an apology



>Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 23:05 -0800

>>>Yes, it matters to me that Chung filed a false police report that
>>>accused me of doing something I did not do. <<

>If this were true then why have we not seen Dr. Chung - a
>righteous man - charged with a crime?

....................

Why?  Because I have not filed a complaint with the police.  Were I to
file a complaint and indicate my willingness to press charges, then
Dr. Chung would be charged with the crime of filing a false police
report.  Dr. Chung is no righteous man.  But I am - which is why I
have not filed a complaint with the police.  I figure that Dr. Chung
will answer to a greater court someday.  I believe in my convictions,
"Anonymous," unlike Dr. Chung who at the drop of a hat runs to the
police because he was upset that I discovered he lied to the AMA about
his credentials and wanted to "get back at me."

........................

Quote:

>>>And yes, it matters to me that Chung filed a false report with the
>>>Georgia Medical Board that accused me of doing something I
>>>did not do.<<

>If this were true then why have we not seen Dr. Chung - a righteous
>man - charged with a crime?

........................

Why?  Because I have not filed a complaint with the police.  Were I to
file a complaint and indicate my willingness to press charges, then
Dr. Chung would be charged with the crime of filing a false police
report.  Dr. Chung is no righteous man.  But I am - which is why I
have not filed a complaint with the police.  I figure that Dr. Chung
will answer to a greater court someday.  I believe in my convictions,
"Anonymous," unlike Dr. Chung who at the drop of a hat runs to the
police because he was upset that I discovered he lied to the AMA about
his credentials and wanted to "get back at me."

..........................

Quote:

>>>But does it matter to me that Chung will suffer greatly for his sins? Given
>>>that he is clealy unrepentant - no, it does not matter to me in
>the least.<<

>You sound like a religious sociopath when you say such things.

.......................

I sound like a religious psychcopath?  Me?  You're on {*filter*}, right?

......................

Quote:
>Surely you care if Dr. Chung suffers the torments of hell.

.......................

Chung will be judged by God - not by man.  And from where I sit, Chung
is in pretty bad damned shape.  But ultimately it's going to be God's
decision.  And if God determines that Chung should forever suffer the
torments of hell - well, that's God's call to make.  Chung is one of
the greatest hypocrites I have ever encountered in my life.  And he
has committed his acts of hyprocrisy in God's name.  Moreover he is
totally unrepentant.  If in view of his utter lack of remorse, God
determines that Chung should suffer greatly for his sins, I'm not
going to give it a second thought.

.....................

Quote:
>I am hoping you do not suffer ...

.....................

The e-mail continues with a whole bunch quotes from scripture, but
I'll stop with the following:

I do not believe that calling oneself a Christian gives a person free
reign to act in a highly unchristian-like manner in this world with
the expectation that God will simply "sweep everything under the rug"
on judgement day.  I do not believe that God finds the kind of lip
service Chung has been paying Him to be in the least bit amusing.  I
believe that God knows the difference between "talking the talk" and
"walking the talk."

And if that makes me a "religious psychopath," so be it.

smn



Thu, 31 Aug 2006 18:45:17 GMT
 
 [ 1 post ] 

 Relevant Pages 

1. what is "TS"

2. "THANK GOD for anonymous remailers"

3. RACHEL: "Contract" Response

4. A Response From a "1000 Parent of Light"//Mental-Health Rip-Offs Explained

5. A Response From a "1000 Parent of Light"/Rip-Offs Explained

6. A Response From a "1000 Parent of Light"/Mental-Health Rip-Offs Explained

7. A Response From a "1000 Parent of Light"//Mental-Health Rip-Offs Explaine

8. "Vagal Response"

9. "government non response" [on diseases]

10. CONDITIONED RESPONSES VS "NEW" BRAIN TECHNOLOGY

11. Response to "Dr. Jeffrey Utz"

12. "Response to SARS concerns the WHO"


 
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software