
Weight Loss with exercise, without exercise, and Exercise with no weight
Quote:
> Here's another very interesting study comparing the following
> conditions:
> 1. Exercise with weight loss
> 2. Exercise without weight loss (they ate more)
> 3. Weight loss from calorie restriction and no exercise
> 4. Control.
> Amoung the finding are:
> a.The Exercise/Weight loss group lost the most viseral fat.
> b. The Exercise/Weight loss group livers decrease glucose production
> Alot more than the other groups.
> It seems that exrecising and reducing calories are atleast not
> increasing them has very potent efffects for diabetics.
> This should put a stop to those that minimize the importance of
> exercise. Oh, sorry I forgot nobody says this.
> Actually they do (Susan said this in the past) and its in the
> archieves.
> Randy
> Refs:
> http://www.***.com/
> The Impact of Exercise Training Compared to Caloric Restriction on
> Hepatic and Peripheral Insulin Resistance in Obesity
> Robert H. Coker, Rick H. Williams, Sophie E. Yeo, Patrick M.
> Kortebein, Don L. Bodenner, Philip A. Kern and William J. Evans
> Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System (R.H.C.), and the
> Departments of Geriatrics (R.H.C., R.H.W., S.E.Y., D.L.B., W.J.E.) and
> Medicine (P.A.K.), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little
> Rock, Arkansas 72205
> Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Robert H.
> Coker, Ph.D., Nutrition, Metabolism, and Exercise Laboratory, Donald
> W. Reynolds Institute on Aging, 4301 W. Markham, Slot 806, University
> of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas 72205. E-mail:
> Context: It has been difficult to distinguish the independent effects
> of caloric restriction versus exercise training on insulin
> resistance.
> Objective: Utilizing metabolic feeding and supervised exercise
> training, we examined the influence of caloric restriction vs.
> exercise training with and without weight loss on hepatic and
> peripheral insulin resistance.
> Design, Participants, and Intervention: Thirty-four obese, older
> subjects were randomized to: caloric restriction with weight loss
> (CR), exercise training with weight loss (EWL), exercise training
> without weight loss (EX), or controls. Based on an equivalent caloric
> deficit in EWL and CR, we induced matched weight loss. Subjects in the
> EX group received caloric compensation. Combined with [6,62H2]glucose,
> an octreotide, glucagon, multistage insulin infusion was performed to
> determine suppression of glucose production (SGP) and insulin-
> stimulated glucose disposal (ISGD). Computed tomography scans were
> performed to assess changes in fat distribution.
> Results: Body weight decreased similarly in EWL and CR, and did not
> change in EX and controls. The reduction in visceral fat was
> significantly greater in EWL (71 15 cm2) compared to CR and EX. The
> increase in SGP was also almost 3-fold greater (27 2%) in EWL. EWL
> and CR promoted similar improvements in ISGD [+2.5 0.4 and 2.4 0.9
> mg kg fat-free mass (FFM)1 min1], respectively.
> Conclusions: EWL promoted the most significant reduction in visceral
> fat and the greatest improvement in SGP. Equivalent increases in ISGD
> were noted in EWL and CR, whereas EX provided a modest improvement.
> Based on our results, EWL promoted the optimal intervention-based
> changes in body fat distribution and systemic insulin resistance.
Smarter to hold to the right daily amount (32 oz) of
cooking.net">food to lose the
visceral adipose tissue (VAT) that increases risk of injury during
exercise and http://www.***.com/
Yes, right amount (omer) control as Chris Malcolm is doing is much
more sophisticated and smarter:
http://www.***.com/
Be hungrier, which really is healthier especially for diabetics and
other heart disease patients:
http://www.***.com/
We do this by weighing our meals per the http://www.***.com/
Approach to get our...
http://www.***.com/
and then...
http://www.***.com/
so that there will be...
http://www.***.com/
Being hungry is truly wonderful as proven by four lines of evidence:
Mathematical:
http://www.***.com/
Historical:
http://www.***.com/
Medical:
http://www.***.com/
Psychological:
http://www.***.com/
So that we really should http://www.***.com/
"wonderfully hungry" whenever we are greeted:
http://www.***.com/
There is pure joy in being used by GOD to convince others:
http://www.***.com/
"A 2005 visit to an Atlanta cardiologist by the name of Andrew Chung
put me on some serious reality
I wasnt just chubby or husky, I am what they often call morbidly
obese. He explained that morbid obesity simply means that if something
happened to me that could be attiributed to weight and I were to end
up in the not breathing state
ok some call it DEAD
that a doctor could simply dismiss it as natural causes related to
weight more or less.
Ive been told I was a chunky fella a couple times, maybe even fat...
but not quite that harshly. Definitely made me think about a few
things, as much as I dislike scare tactics when it comes to health.
Well in the midst of the shock treatment, he also had me come to a
heart wellness seminar that he does on some Saturdays in Mableton.
Nice little get together, he has folks from the community come in and
discuss Tai Chi, exercises, testimonials, all kinds of good stuff.
Then he shows the movie SUPERSIZE ME to set up the pitch for his 2PD
Omer approach that he has his patients use to lose weight.
In a nutshell, in his view, HOW MUCH you eat is more of the issue than
WHAT you eat and portion is more important than any fat content or
calories.
I agree with this. This is why I have always been more successful on
more liquid diets (cabbage soup, slimfast, herbalife (tho dangerous))
than anything else. I wasnt eating the portions I was before that..."
Source:
http://www.***.com/
Love in the truth,
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-certified Cardiologist
and Author of the 2PD-OMER Approach:
http://www.***.com/