Try searching MedLine at http://www.***.com/
Here's the most recent article (from a different MedLine search
engine). Several others are in other languages.
ARTICLE TITLE: The effects of normothermic and hypothermic
cardiopulmonary bypass on defibrillation energy requirements and
transmyocardial impedance. Implications for implantable
cardioverter-defibrillator implantation.
ARTICLE SOURCE: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg (United States), May 1995,
109(5) p981-8
AUTHOR(S): Martin D; Garcia J; Valeri CR; Khuri SF
AUTHOR'S ADDRESS: Department of Cardiology, West Roxbury Veterans
Administration Medical Center, MA, USA.
MAJOR SUBJECT HEADING(S): Defibrillators, Implantable; Electric
Impedance; Heart Arrest, Induced [methods]; Heart [physiology]
MINOR SUBJECT HEADING(S): Body Temperature; Dogs; Hydrogen-Ion
Concentration; Hypothermia, Induced; Ventricular Fibrillation
[metabolism]
INDEXING CHECK TAG(S): Animal; Male; Support, Non-U.S. Gov't;
Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
PUBLICATION TYPE: JOURNAL ARTICLE
ABSTRACT: The influence of normothermic and hypothermic
cardiopulmonary bypass on defibrillation energy requirements and
transcardiac impedance is not well characterized. However, this
relationship is of clinical importance during automatic defibrillator
implantation done with concomitant cardiac surgery, and there is
anecdotal information that criteria for successful implantation are
harder to achieve after such operations. We studied the effect of
controlled hypothermia on defibrillation energy requirements and
transcardiac impedance in a canine model of cardiopulmonary bypass in
which 26 animals underwent right atrial and fem{*filter*}arterial
cannulation, as well as continuous hemodynamic and intramyocardial
temperature monitoring. The defibrillation energy requirements were
evaluated at 60-minute intervals with an epicardial patch system, and
transcardiac impedance was measured before and after the multiple
inductions and terminations of ventricular fibrillation. In group 1 (n
= 10) defibrillation energy requirements were evaluated immediately
after initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass at 37 degrees C (T0), after
gradual cooling to 28 degrees C (T1), and after rewarming to 37
degrees C (T2). Group 2 (n = 16) comprised time controls that were
identically instrumented and studied, but maintained at 37 degrees C
throughout. Percent successful defibrillation was plotted against
delivered energy, and the raw data fit by logistic regression. The
energy at which 50% of shocks were successful (E50) was 3.23 +/- 0.89
joules at T0, 5.12 +/- 1.85 joules at T1, and 4.42 +/- 1.22 joules at
T2 in group 1; this was not significantly different from the
corresponding group 2 E50 values, which were 3.11 +/- 1.39 joules,
4.95 +/- 2.47 joules, and 5.59 +/- 3.18 joules, respectively. Both
groups demonstrated a significant increase in E50 during the first
hour of cardiopulmonary bypass (mean increase from T0 to T1 was 1.89
joules in group 1 and 1.84 joules in group 2, p 0.05). Transmyocardial
impedance fell progressively during the group 2 experiments from 73.6
+/- 12.9 omega at the beginning of the T0 shock series to 61.4 +/- 8.9
omega at the end of the T2 shock series. A similar reduction in
transmyocardial impedance was observed during the course of all the
group 1 experiments; however, at the beginning of the T1 shock series
impedance was significantly elevated to 77.4 +/- 12.3 omega (p 0.05
compared with group 2 and with end T0 in group 1). There was no
relationship between defibrillation energy requirements and
transcardiac impedance; there was also no correlation between either
of these parameters and intramyocardial extracellular pH or left
ventricular end-diastolic pressure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS).
MEDLINE INDEXING DATE: 9508
ISSN: 0022-5223
LANGUAGE: English
UNIQUE NLM IDENTIFIER: 95257617
----------------------------------------
Paul A. Delaney
Georgetown University School of Medicine
Please respond by posting, or by e-mail after
removing the (NoSpam!) from my addess.