I would like to know the relative accuracy for predicting
2-5 year incidence of sudden heart attack for 1) 9 minute Bruce treadmill
protocol, 2) angiogram, and 3) fast scan.

I would like to know the frequency of both fslse positives
and false negatives for each.

--

Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications
  Omen Technology Inc      "The High Reliability Software"
10255 NW Old Cornelius Pass Portland OR 97231   FAX 629-0665

Would suggest that you rely on your cardiologist to advise you on which
test would be best one for your particular situation factoring in your
history, your risk factors, your physical exam and any pertinent test
results to date.

Will be available to "glow" and chat about this and other things like
cardiology, diabetes, Bird Flu, the Lamb's opening of the 6th seal (Rev.
6:12), cooking and nutrition that interest those following this thread
here during the next on-line chat(05/04/06) from 5 to 6 pm EST, LORD
willing:

http://tinyurl.com/8w7uq

For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:

http://tinyurl.com/7mcuo

Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love,

Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/zlaml

Not that I would know the exact numbers anyway, but your question is
underspecified. These tests don't give yes/no answers:

A stress test can show mild or severe abnormalities.

An angiogram can be "positive" because there is a 70% blockage of a
minor {*filter*} vessel or because of a 99% blockage of the left main
coronary artery.

The implications of these various "positive" results are very different.

--
David Rind