The Darwinian theory of evolution and the genetic theory of evolution
are inadequate to describe what really happens in evolution.

Let me put it this way. If you want to know how to repair a car, it
helps to know how it the car is put together. Likewise, if you want to
help people to get well, it is extremely important to know HOW human
beings and all of life evolved.

It is essential to have a proper understanding of the correct
evolutionary process to know how stop the noxious activities of viruses
and bacteria. If you grasp this, you will forever be far ahead of any
and all funded scientists in the US and most of Europe today.

To explain how evolution actually works it would be best to look at the
evolutionary progression of viruses, bacteria, and fungi.

Every bacteria is comprised of a virus as its primary part, and the
secondary parts of fatty acids and nucleo-proteins. The fatty acids
neutralize the noxious powers of the virus which enables the bacteria
to survive as a life form.

Every fungus, yeast, mold is comprised of a bacteria as its primary
part, and the secondary parts of phospholipids and other constituents.
The phospholipids neutralize the noxious effects of the bacteria which
allows the fungi etc, to survive as a life form.

A virus never, and I mean NEVER, mutates to become anything other than
a new virus. A bacteria never, and I mean NEVER, mutates to become
anything other than a new bacteria.

As a corallary, certain fatty acids always, and I mean ALWAYS, act as
neutralizers of viruses. And certain phospholipids always, and I mean
ALWAYS, act as neutralizers of bacteria. This has been true since the
existence of viruses and bacteria and molds, which would be billions of
years.

Biological life evolved from viruses to bacteria to molds, fungi, and
yeasts and beyond to more complex life forms through this method.
Genetic mutation did not cause the leap from viruses to bacteria to
fungi, etc.

There are untold varieties of viruses, bacteria, and fungi because they
do mutate while remaining as viruses or bacteria or fungi.

Some viruses, bacteria and fungi are their own endpoints because the
particular mutation they have achieved are not compatible with becoming
a higher life form.

This helps to explain why there are so many holes in the trail of
evolutionary progression. We are constantly at a loss to find the
'ancestors' of various life forms. That's because we are searching for
gradual changes, say for instance from dinosaurs to birds. But
evolution didn't happen that way.

For instance, when a virus becomes a bacteria there is no gradual trail
to observe. In a way, the difference would be sort of like the
difference between a {*filter*} and a fertilized egg -- a big difference!

Similarly, when a bacteria took on the secondary parts of phospholipids
to become a fungi or a mold or a yeast, it was a huge change. As a
result, there was no evolutionary trail to follow.

A critical -- essential -- criteria for a jump to a higher life form is
that the higher life form MUST have a natural defense against the
noxious aspect of the lower life form. All life forms must eat, so the
higher life form must be able to shut off that aspect in the lower life
form but provide a new way of sustaining life.

As an addendum to this, the nucleus of human cells appear to correspond
to the bacterial level. Cells appear to correspond to the fungal level,
which is interesting because fungi, yeast, and molds are single cell
life forms.

Mitochondria are also interesting to look at from this evolutionary
approach, since they appear to be interlopers of a sort. How they might
fit in, I don't know.

So here's what it means to you. Fatty acids shut off viral noxiousness.
Phospholipids shut of bacterial noxiousness.

This means if you come down with a viral infection, or you want to
prevent one -- be sure to have an adequate intake of fatty acids in
your diet.

To neutralize bacterial infections, use phospholipids.

I don't know which lipids shut off fungi, yeasts and molds. Fortunately
I've found various herbs that do it, such as Pau D'Arco, although I
don't know what the neutralizing component is.

DOA

< snip 100 lines of Nobel Prize losing {*filter*}>

moo

I'll get one of those before you get a Nobel, spammer.

I've seen nothing but a thorough trashing of your new theory of evolution by
anyone here.  And, I note that you haven't responded to the criticisms with
much else than more drivel.  But, I doubt you care as long as your eBook
spam gets noticed.

moo

References please.  And maybe a link to some definitions of the "theory".

m

It isn't rvrn defined like any scientific theory.

Bullshit.  Liar.  Spamming idiot.  Come back with a cogent theory and some
evidence.  Real evidence.

moo

Exactly.  And if it makes nonsensical claims about "bacteria are
viruses with add-on components," thus requiring viruses to have
existed first, it's bogus and can be discarded.

Yeah, right.  I'll believe *that* one when I see some hard evidence.

  -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
     These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
       "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
           were standing on my shoulders."  (Hal Abelson, MIT)

Yes.  DOA.  There are lots of crank "theories" to choose from.

No theory.  No evidence.
< snip anecdotal claims >

Do you have ANY real studies that show a real novel effect?

m

When it comes to an evolutionary theory such as Hierarchic Organization
you won't see hard evidence, only a series of bits of evidence that all
point in the same direction.

By this I mean you would have a hard time recreating viruses
transforming themselves into bacteria because it might be that they
occurred during heavy volcanic activity with concomitant electrical
storms.

However, the theory can be used as a way of looking at cell
development, cell defenses, etc. Then they can be tested. For instance,
rabbits were pretreated with either fatty acid or sterol injections
under their skin. (Sterols are compliments or antagonists to fatty
acids.)

The next day, viruses were introduced to the sites where the previous
injections were made. In the sites that were injected with sterols, the
viruses flourished. In contrast, the viruses were unable to take hold
in the sites pretreated with the fatty acids. So it appears that the
fatty acids provided an effective defense against viruses.

In another study, mice were given anthrax, tuberuculosis, and a third
bacterial infection (I forget which one.) Almost every one died.
Another group of the same strain of mice were given phospholipids and
then infected with the bacteria. Between 100% and 90% lived.

So by applying the theory in animals, the results were consistent with
what one would expect from the H.O. theory.

That is how the H.O. theory could be used -- to provide direction in
experimenting on what is likely to work in the treatment of disease.
The H.O. theory merely gives scientists and others a new way of looking
at how life is organized. If the theory is correct, it will then
provide fruitful results when tested and applied.

Inasmuch as viruses are inactive until they have a cell to use, you'd
have a hard time getting them to do anything at all.

That's a long way from showing anything at all about evolution.

  -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
     These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
       "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
           were standing on my shoulders."  (Hal Abelson, MIT)