Regarding a few posts referring to Alberta Health and Chelation Therapy:
Quote:
>>are being funded - and will shortly get underway. The Alberta Health
>>ministry in Canada has authorized $86,000 for a randomized clinical
>>trial in the provinces with the hopes of having chelation therapy
>>covered by their national health insurance.
Not exactly. There are a few MD's in Alberta and other Canadian
provinces who run private chelation clinics and bill patients
directly for chelation treatments. Obviously the proponents of
chelation would like to see the provincial medicare plans pick up
the tab for chelation therapy as it does for most physician and
hospital costs. We are in the midst of balancing our provicial
deficit and unless a therapy is of proven benefit, it is not
likely to be added to the medicare plan. Alberta Health (the
provincial ministry of Health) would prefer not to cover any more
than it already does.
Quote:
>What is the Alberta Health ministry ... is this actually a branch of the
>Canadian government? For $86,0000, the study obviously will include only a
>few patients ... and certainly won't be a long term followup study.
In Canada, the provision of health care is mainly a provincial
responsibility. So, the individual provincial ministries of
health payroll the delivery of health care. Actually, the study
is being done by reputable faculty at the U of C. I understand
that angiopraphy is part of trial but I'll try to get more
details. Needless to say, the mere performance of a trial
supports neither side in this debate. It is the methodology and
outcomes that count.
Quote:
>How about a double-blind multicenter academic study of several thousand
>patients including angiography before and several years after a complete
>course of chelation?
Personally, I would prefer to see a few good small trials done
before devoting "GUSTO" or "DCCT" type resources the issue of
chelation therapy.