http://www.***.com/

 By Mike Adams

Do you realize that one of the most powerful cures for cancer is streaming
over our heads each and every day, free of charge? It's sunlight, which is
astounding in its ability to prevent and cure cancer. If it were a
mainstream drug, it would probably make the cover of Time magazine and be
heralded as the greatest medical breakthrough in the history of modern
science. It's that good.
Sunlight exposure reduces the risk of many cancers by more than 50 percent
and even helps reverse certain types of cancers through the creation of
vitamin D in the body. It's a magnificent natural healing modality, and it's
been right in front of our eyes, every single day, since before Homo sapiens
even evolved on this planet. Yet somehow, after spending billions of dollars
on so-called medical research to find "cures" for various cancers, almost no
one from the world of mainstream medicine has yet acknowledged the healing
power of natural sunlight and vitamin D.

None of them have actually prescribed sunlight to patients, except for
perhaps a handful of pioneering researchers like Dr. Michael Holick, who was
attacked for speaking out about the truth of sunlight and cancer. By and
large, the medical community has not only ignored this truly miraculous cure
for many types of cancer; it has worked hard to discredit it.

If there were ever a reason to lose faith in conventional medicine, or
so-called modern medicine, it is simply the fact that one of the greatest
cures and prevention strategies for cancer goes completely ignored by nearly
the entire conventional medical community. It's as if there were a miracle
medicine invented, but conventional medical doctors didn't want anyone to
find out about it. Why aren't researchers promoting cures that are available
for free?

Protecting the medical dogma
The medical community doesn't want to promote cures it did not invent. When
nature offers a cure, that's not very satisfying to the egos of drug company
researchers and scientists. A drug company only wants to promote cures that
it can patent and exploit for financial gain. The way it perpetuates the
cycle is to make sure that the cancer treatments it controls get a lot more
press and hype than any natural treatments. You don't see sunlight promoted
in full-page adverti{*filter*}ts for its ability to prevent or reverse cancer.
Instead, the medical community uses the full-page adverti{*filter*}t for
high-profit prescription {*filter*} that have negative side effects and actually
kill people.

More at link

There is some evidence from observational studies that Vitamin D deficiency
is associated with an increased risk of certain types of cancer.  There is
none that either sunlight or Vitamin D can cure cancer, and it is
irresponsible to say so..

This is the same Mike Adams that wrote the deceptive tripe about
supplements.

Peter Moran

www.cancerwatcher.com

"Peter Moran"

Says Peter Moran who was irresponsible in saying there were no cover ups,
which kiiled Jessi Gelsinger...

In FACT...he OUTRIGHT LIED.....

 Peter Moran

 This is the same Mike Adams that wrote the truth about supplements.

And MORE that Peter Moran does NOT watch....

http://www.***.com/

http://www.***.com/

http://www.***.com/

For your information ... enjoy your day.

H. Gordon Ainsleigh, DC, "Beneficial effects of sun exposure on cancer
mortality", Preventive Medicine, January 1, 1993, Vol. 22, Num. 0, pp.
132-140

"For more than 50 years, there has been documentation in the medical
literature suggesting that regular sun exposure is associated with
substantial decreases in death rates from certain cancers and a
decrease in overall cancer death rates. Recent research suggests that
this is a causal relationship that acts through the body's vitamin D
metabolic pathways. The studies reviewed here show that (a) sunlight
activation is our most effective source of vitamin D; (b) regular
sunlight/vitamin D "intake" inhibits growth of {*filter*} and colon cancer
cells and is associated with substantial decreases in death rates from
these cancers; (c) metabolites of vitamin D have induced leukemia and
lymphoma cells to differentiate, prolonged survival of leukemic mice,
and produced complete and partial clinical responses in lymphoma
patients having high vitamin D metabolite receptor levels in tumor
tissue; (d) sunlight has a paradoxical relationship with melanoma, in
that severe sunburning initiates melanoma whereas long-term regular sun
exposure inhibits melanoma; (e) frequent regular sun exposure acts to
cause cancers that have a 0.3% death rate with 2,000 U.S. fatalities
per year and acts to prevent cancers that have death rates from 20-65%
with 138,000 U.S. fatalities per year; (f) there is support in the
medical literature to suggest that the 17% increase in {*filter*} cancer
incidence during the 1991-1992 year may be the result of the past
decade of pervasive anti-sun advisories from respected authorities,
coinciding with effective sunscreen availability; and (g) trends in the
epidemiological literature suggest that approximately 30,000 U.S.
cancer deaths yearly would be averted by the widespread public adoption
of regular, moderate sunning. Advising the public to seek regular
moderate sun exposure finds good support in the scientific literature
as a means of lowering cancer mortality."

"In 1941, Apperly reported that overall cancer death rates increased
with distance from the equator, and were further decreased in areas
where a large percentage of the population was engaged in the
sun-intensive occupation of farming. Compared with cities located
between 10 and 30 latitude, cities between 30 and 40 latitude
averaged 85% higher overall cancer death rates, cities between 40 and
50 latitude averaged 118% higher overall cancer death rates, and
cities between 50 and 60 latitude averaged 150% higher overall
cancer death rates. After reviewing his data, the author concluded: "A
closer study of the action of solar radiation on the body might well
reveal the nature of cancer immunity."

"Studies published during the past 20 years demonstrate that the link
between sun exposure and cancer prevention acts through the vitamin D
metabolic pathways."

"Vitamin D and Sunlight - In addition to its low cost and "high
patient acceptance", sunlight activation of 7-dehydrocholesterol in the
skin has significant advantages as a vitamin D source compared with
diet and supplementation. Webb and Hollick have discussed how sunlight
activation bypasses any gastrointestinal vitamin D malabsorption
problem and also avoid the overdose toxicity potential present with
{*filter*}vitamin D intake by the self-limiting production of D3-inactive
previtamin D3 photoisomers. The importance of sunlight in supplying
human vitamin D needs was demonstrated by Haddad and Hahn, who reported
that even in high-latitude, often-overcast Britain, sunlight provides
70% or more of the vitamin D present in the {*filter*} of Caucasians."

"{*filter*} Cancer - Support for the biochemical relationship between sun
exposure and cancer inhibition came in 1979, when Eisman et al. of the
University of Melborne reported that a human {*filter*} cancer cell line
had receptor sites for 1,25-dihydroxyvitmain D3 (1,25-(OH)2-D3), the
most active metabolite of vitamin D. ... in 1990, the Garland-Gorham
team found that women from the areas of the United States with less
available sunlight died 40-60% more frequently of {*filter*} cancer than
women who lived in places like Honolulu and Tampa. The dramatic
variation in {*filter*} cancer rates according to geographic area in the
United States had been know for some time, but had previously gone
unexplained. The Garland research accounted for the geographic
variation in {*filter*} cancer in a way that had been previously
overlooked, showing a very strong negative correlation (R = -0.80, P <
0.0001) between available sunlight and {*filter*} cancer death rates."
"Colon Cancer - In 1980 Frank and Cedric Garland presented the first
modern epidemiological research suggesting a direct protective effect
of sunlight vitamin D on cancer, showing that colon cancer was
decreased in areas of the United States with greater sun exposure. In
1985, further research by the Garlands showed decreased colon cancer
rates with higher {*filter*}vitamin D and calcium intake in a prospective
study. Wargovich and Lointier followed in 1987 with a report that
1,25-(OH)2-D3 suppressed growth of human colon cancer cells in vitro.
In 1989, the Garland brothers, joined Edward Gorham and others,
demonstrated that increased {*filter*} levels of 25-hyrdoxyvitamin D were
associated with lower colon cancer incidence rates."

"Melanoma and Squamous-Basal Cancers of the Skin - The recent
increases in melanoma and squamous-basal skin cancers have been used to
justify advising everybody to either stay out of the sun or wear
sunblock. However, as show below, there is reason to believe that these
recommendations are flawed. Koh et al. described squamous and basal
cell skin cancers as most prevelant on the head-neck and forearms-hands
where cumulative sun exposure is greatest, while melanoma is most
prevalent on generally covered parts of the body. Boring et al.
estimated 600,000 cases and 2,000 deaths (0.3% death rate) in 1991 from
squamous-basal skin cancer. Melanoma, however, has a 20% fatality rate
because of its typically early metastasis, producing 6,500 U.S. deaths
in 1991 from 32,000 cases."

"The literature review and four studies that follow suggest a
paradoxical relationship in which melanoma is initiated by severe
sunburning, but inhibited by nonburning sun exposure. Koh et al., in
their 1990 article on sunlight and melanoma, reviewed a substantial
body of research indicating a causative relationship between "blister
and peel" sunburning before the age of 20 and melanoma onset later.
However, a 1981 study by Colston et al. reported that melanoma cells
have receptors for 1,25-(OH)2-D3 and that this vitamin D metabolite
slows the doubling time of melanoma cells in vitro. Also, in 1987,
Eisman et al. demonstrated growth suppression of melanoma cells in a
laboratory environment using 1,25-(OH)2-D3. Consitent with the findings
of Colston and Eisman, Vagero et al. have shown that people who work
outdoors get more total sun exposure but have a lower incidence of
melanoma than office workers. Additionally, Crombie observed that
melanoma seldom occurs on area of the skin that get regular sun
exposure, also suggesting the preventative effect of consistent
sunning."

"Sun-Promoted vs Sun-Inhibited Cancers - For more than 10 years, U.S.
health authorities have pervasively and effectively advised against all
sun exposure, including regular moderate exposure. Since melanoma has
been shown to be inhibited by vitamin D and regular sun exposure, these
advisories against regular moderate exposure can only be correctly
based on solar promotion of squamous-basal skin cancers, which have a
death rate of 0.3% and cause only 2,000 U.S. deaths yearly. In
contrast, about 138,000 people in the United States die each year of
cancer with death rates of 20-65% which have been shown to be inhibited
by vitamin D, its metabolites, and regular sun exposure. The
epidemiological studies show trends suggesting that widespread public
adoption of routine sunbathing would result in approximately a
one-third lowering of {*filter*} and colon cancer death rates, or about
32,000 fewer U.S. cancer deaths yearly. An increase in squamous-basal
skin cancer would be expected, but even a 100% increase, with 2,000
additional deaths per year, would still leave a net 30,000 fewer U.S.
cancer deaths. A decrease in deaths from leukemia, lymphoma, and
melanoma would also be expected, but lack the epidemiological studies
makes this prediction more difficult to quantify."

"Sunscreen Use and Cancer Rates - American Cancer Society statistics
show that estimated {*filter*} cancer incidence recently increased 17% in 1
year, from 150,000 new cases in 1990 to 175,000 in 1991. In a search
for the cause of this dramatic increase, the following must be
considered: (a) previously cited research showing that decreased sun
exposure causes increased {*filter*} cancer; (b) research showing that the
past decade of anti-sun advisories has resulted in decreased sun
exposure with increased sunscreen use; (c) research linking chronic
sunscreen use to decreased {*filter*} levels of 25-OH-D3, the necessary
precursor to 1,25-(OH)2-D3; (d) research showing that decreased tissue
levels of 1,25-(OH)2-D3 is associated with increased growth rates of
{*filter*} cancer. From these research findings, it appears reasonable to
speculate that the cause of this increase in {*filter*} cancer is that for
more than a decade our population has been encouraged as never before
to avoid sun exposure; meanwhile, because of the concurrent emergence
of very effective topical sun blockers, effectively avoiding sun
exposure has become very easy. Furthermore, a substantial body of
knowledge provided in recent literature review suggests that regular
sunscreen use is associated with higher risk of melanoma. Increased
risk of basal cell cancer has been noted among women who use
sunscreen."

"Conclusions and Recommendations - The benefits of regular ...

read more »

That should be "Allopathic" cancer watcher
http://www.whale.to/a/cancer_c.html

they just watch you die while they pocket the money

Thanks, Roman.

As usual our source of the truth.

Enjoy yours.

Much appreciated.

Jan

For your information ... enjoy your day.

H. Gordon Ainsleigh, DC, "Beneficial effects of sun exposure on cancer
mortality", Preventive Medicine, January 1, 1993, Vol. 22, Num. 0, pp.
132-140

"For more than 50 years, there has been documentation in the medical
literature suggesting that regular sun exposure is associated with
substantial decreases in death rates from certain cancers and a
decrease in overall cancer death rates. Recent research suggests that
this is a causal relationship that acts through the body's vitamin D
metabolic pathways. The studies reviewed here show that (a) sunlight
activation is our most effective source of vitamin D; (b) regular
sunlight/vitamin D "intake" inhibits growth of {*filter*} and colon cancer
cells and is associated with substantial decreases in death rates from
these cancers; (c) metabolites of vitamin D have induced leukemia and
lymphoma cells to differentiate, prolonged survival of leukemic mice,
and produced complete and partial clinical responses in lymphoma
patients having high vitamin D metabolite receptor levels in tumor
tissue; (d) sunlight has a paradoxical relationship with melanoma, in
that severe sunburning initiates melanoma whereas long-term regular sun
exposure inhibits melanoma; (e) frequent regular sun exposure acts to
cause cancers that have a 0.3% death rate with 2,000 U.S. fatalities
per year and acts to prevent cancers that have death rates from 20-65%
with 138,000 U.S. fatalities per year; (f) there is support in the
medical literature to suggest that the 17% increase in {*filter*} cancer
incidence during the 1991-1992 year may be the result of the past
decade of pervasive anti-sun advisories from respected authorities,
coinciding with effective sunscreen availability; and (g) trends in the
epidemiological literature suggest that approximately 30,000 U.S.
cancer deaths yearly would be averted by the widespread public adoption
of regular, moderate sunning. Advising the public to seek regular
moderate sun exposure finds good support in the scientific literature
as a means of lowering cancer mortality."

"In 1941, Apperly reported that overall cancer death rates increased
with distance from the equator, and were further decreased in areas
where a large percentage of the population was engaged in the
sun-intensive occupation of farming. Compared with cities located
between 10 and 30 latitude, cities between 30 and 40 latitude
averaged 85% higher overall cancer death rates, cities between 40 and
50 latitude averaged 118% higher overall cancer death rates, and
cities between 50 and 60 latitude averaged 150% higher overall
cancer death rates. After reviewing his data, the author concluded: "A
closer study of the action of solar radiation on the body might well
reveal the nature of cancer immunity."

"Studies published during the past 20 years demonstrate that the link
between sun exposure and cancer prevention acts through the vitamin D
metabolic pathways."

"Vitamin D and Sunlight - In addition to its low cost and "high
patient acceptance", sunlight activation of 7-dehydrocholesterol in the
skin has significant advantages as a vitamin D source compared with
diet and supplementation. Webb and Hollick have discussed how sunlight
activation bypasses any gastrointestinal vitamin D malabsorption
problem and also avoid the overdose toxicity potential present with
{*filter*}vitamin D intake by the self-limiting production of D3-inactive
previtamin D3 photoisomers. The importance of sunlight in supplying
human vitamin D needs was demonstrated by Haddad and Hahn, who reported
that even in high-latitude, often-overcast Britain, sunlight provides
70% or more of the vitamin D present in the {*filter*} of Caucasians."

"{*filter*} Cancer - Support for the biochemical relationship between sun
exposure and cancer inhibition came in 1979, when Eisman et al. of the
University of Melborne reported that a human {*filter*} cancer cell line
had receptor sites for 1,25-dihydroxyvitmain D3 (1,25-(OH)2-D3), the
most active metabolite of vitamin D. ... in 1990, the Garland-Gorham
team found that women from the areas of the United States with less
available sunlight died 40-60% more frequently of {*filter*} cancer than
women who lived in places like Honolulu and Tampa. The dramatic
variation in {*filter*} cancer rates according to geographic area in the
United States had been know for some time, but had previously gone
unexplained. The Garland research accounted for the geographic
variation in {*filter*} cancer in a way that had been previously
overlooked, showing a very strong negative correlation (R = -0.80, P <
0.0001) between available sunlight and {*filter*} cancer death rates."
"Colon Cancer - In 1980 Frank and Cedric Garland presented the first
modern epidemiological research suggesting a direct protective effect
of sunlight vitamin D on cancer, showing that colon cancer was
decreased in areas of the United States with greater sun exposure. In
1985, further research by the Garlands showed decreased colon cancer
rates with higher {*filter*}vitamin D and calcium intake in a prospective
study. Wargovich and Lointier followed in 1987 with a report that
1,25-(OH)2-D3 suppressed growth of human colon cancer cells in vitro.
In 1989, the Garland brothers, joined Edward Gorham and others,
demonstrated that increased {*filter*} levels of 25-hyrdoxyvitamin D were
associated with lower colon cancer incidence rates."

"Melanoma and Squamous-Basal Cancers of the Skin - The recent
increases in melanoma and squamous-basal skin cancers have been used to
justify advising everybody to either stay out of the sun or wear
sunblock. However, as show below, there is reason to believe that these
recommendations are flawed. Koh et al. described squamous and basal
cell skin cancers as most prevelant on the head-neck and forearms-hands
where cumulative sun exposure is greatest, while melanoma is most
prevalent on generally covered parts of the body. Boring et al.
estimated 600,000 cases and 2,000 deaths (0.3% death rate) in 1991 from
squamous-basal skin cancer. Melanoma, however, has a 20% fatality rate
because of its typically early metastasis, producing 6,500 U.S. deaths
in 1991 from 32,000 cases."

"The literature review and four studies that follow suggest a
paradoxical relationship in which melanoma is initiated by severe
sunburning, but inhibited by nonburning sun exposure. Koh et al., in
their 1990 article on sunlight and melanoma, reviewed a substantial
body of research indicating a causative relationship between "blister
and peel" sunburning before the age of 20 and melanoma onset later.
However, a 1981 study by Colston et al. reported that melanoma cells
have receptors for 1,25-(OH)2-D3 and that this vitamin D metabolite
slows the doubling time of melanoma cells in vitro. Also, in 1987,
Eisman et al. demonstrated growth suppression of melanoma cells in a
laboratory environment using 1,25-(OH)2-D3. Consitent with the findings
of Colston and Eisman, Vagero et al. have shown that people who work
outdoors get more total sun exposure but have a lower incidence of
melanoma than office workers. Additionally, Crombie observed that
melanoma seldom occurs on area of the skin that get regular sun
exposure, also suggesting the preventative effect of consistent
sunning."

"Sun-Promoted vs Sun-Inhibited Cancers - For more than 10 years, U.S.
health authorities have pervasively and effectively advised against all
sun exposure, including regular moderate exposure. Since melanoma has
been shown to be inhibited by vitamin D and regular sun exposure, these
advisories against regular moderate exposure can only be correctly
based on solar promotion of squamous-basal skin cancers, which have a
death rate of 0.3% and cause only 2,000 U.S. deaths yearly. In
contrast, about 138,000 people in the United States die each year of
cancer with death rates of 20-65% which have been shown to be inhibited
by vitamin D, its metabolites, and regular sun exposure. The
epidemiological studies show trends suggesting that widespread public
adoption of routine sunbathing would result in approximately a
one-third lowering of {*filter*} and colon cancer death rates, or about
32,000 fewer U.S. cancer deaths yearly. An increase in squamous-basal
skin cancer would be expected, but even a 100% increase, with 2,000
additional deaths per year, would still leave a net 30,000 fewer U.S.
cancer deaths. A decrease in deaths from leukemia, lymphoma, and
melanoma would also be expected, but lack the epidemiological studies
makes this prediction more difficult to quantify."

"Sunscreen Use and Cancer Rates - American Cancer Society statistics
show that estimated {*filter*} cancer incidence recently increased 17% in 1
year, from 150,000 new cases in 1990 to 175,000 in 1991. In a search
for the cause of this dramatic increase, the following must be
considered: (a) previously cited research showing that decreased sun
exposure causes increased {*filter*} cancer; (b) research showing that the
past decade of anti-sun advisories has resulted in decreased sun
exposure with increased sunscreen use; (c) research linking chronic
sunscreen use to decreased {*filter*} levels of 25-OH-D3, the necessary
precursor to 1,25-(OH)2-D3; (d) research showing that decreased tissue
levels of 1,25-(OH)2-D3 is associated with increased growth rates of
{*filter*} cancer. From these research findings, it appears reasonable to
speculate that the cause of this increase in {*filter*} cancer is that for
more than a decade our population has been encouraged as never before
to avoid sun exposure; meanwhile, because of the concurrent emergence
of very effective topical sun blockers, effectively avoiding sun
exposure has become very easy. Furthermore, a substantial body of
knowledge provided in recent literature review suggests ...

read more »

I was aware of this work, of course.  Hence my carefully worded comment
about observational studies indicating the possibility of a preventative
role for Vitamin Din this very preliminary research.  There is still no
evidence that sunlight or Vitamin D can cure cancer -  my main point.

Interestingly, Australians have very high sun exposures, but Muslim women
have low Vitamin D levels presumably through their dress.

Peter Moran

...

read more »

Actually, sunshine causes cancer: skin cancer.

Jeff

Yes....Your claim to be a cancerwatcher....

Means....watching ONLY what you care to watch!

  Hence my carefully worded comment

What would you call this?

destroys {*filter*} cancer tumors
.

More interesting is the LOW Vitamin D levels shown in Dr. Michael Holick's
Book, *Witness The Healing Power
Of Sunlight and Vitamin D*. Everyone should download the interview on this
website, it is quite amazing.

http://www.***.com/

http://www.***.com/

...

read more »

FYI

Roman Bystrianyk, "Sun Exposure Increases Survival from Melanoma",
Health Sentinel, March 8, 2005,

According to the Mayo Clinic, skin cancer is the most common cancer in
the United States. The incidence of skin cancers has been increasing
for the last 50 years in all developed countries. Mortality from skin
cancers has also been increasing, although not as greatly as the
incidence. All forms of skin cancer have been on the rise. More benign
forms include basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas. However, the
greatest rise has been in melanoma, which is the most serious and most
deadly type of skin cancer. The percentage of people with melanoma has
more than doubled over the last 30 years.

Because of the consistent findings that intermittent sun exposure is
associated with an increased risk for melanoma, public health officials
have recommended that excessive sun exposure should be avoided.
Recommendations generally include avoiding sun exposure and use of
sunscreens throughout the year.

A recent study in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute
contradicts this advice. The study looked at 528 melanoma patients who
were entered in the Connecticut Tumor Registry. They examined a number
of factors to determine the risks related to death from melanoma.

They found that sunburn, high intermittent sun exposure, solar
elastosis, which is a marker of sun damage, and self-reported skin
awareness were all linked to improved survival from melanoma. "Sun
exposure was statistically significantly inversely associated with risk
of death from melanoma, regardless of the measure used. Individuals who
has ever been severely burned or who has high levels of intermittent
sun exposure were less likely to die from melanoma than individuals who
had never been severely sunburned or who had low levels of intermittent
sun exposure respectively."

The authors also found that, "recent sunscreen use nor childhood
sunscreen use were statistically associated with the risk of death from
melanoma." They did find that individuals who paid attention to their
skin have a lower risk of death from melanoma, however, "reported
skin self-examination and physician skin examination were not
significantly associated with the risk of death from melanoma."

Attempting to explain their findings the authors note that sun exposure
is essential for the skin to make vitamin D3. Vitamin D has been shown
to be anticancer in nature and therefore could explain the beneficial
association between sun exposure and survival from melanoma. Another
possibility put forward is that sun exposure induces less aggressive
melanoma by increasing the DNA repair capacity and thus reducing
further more deadly changes in melanoma.

The authors conclude that, "we found that intermittent sun exposure
may increase survival from melanoma. If these results are confirmed,
our findings have the potential to lead to interventions, such as
stimulation of the vitamin D pathway or DNA repair capacity, that would
increase survival from melanoma and, perhaps, from other cancers."

SOURCE: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, February 2, 2005

Actually, Jeff if you would read, rather than give these *organized
medicine* pat answers..

You might actually LEARN something!

Aussies just don't get enough sun, Peter, and that is why we have high
rates of cancer. I thought that you would know that.

From the Melanoma Foundation:

http://www.melanomafoundation.com.au/MACb.html

"Melanoma is a major Australian health problem. Every year over 8,000
Australians are diagnosed with melanoma and more than 1,000
Australians die from melanoma.

"Australia has the highest incidence of melanoma in the world,
melanoma is the most common cancer in males aged 25 - 54 and in
females aged 15 - 29 years. It is the second most common cancer in
women 30 - 54 years of age and in the overall population of Australia,
melanoma now ranks as the third most common cancer".

When alternuts tell me that nobody ever gets cured of cancer, I simply
say "Twice". Left side of the nose, behind the right knee. I knew I
should have stayed in the pub instead of getting out in the surf on my
board, way back then when the world was young and there were no
lightweight wetsuits or water-resistant sunblock. But it was a Malibu
...

--
Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

Ever had skin cancer, Jan? Ever heard of someone dying of skin cancer,
Jan?

I was luckier than the 1,000 Australians who died of melanoma in each
of the years that I was diagnosed, treated and CURED.

--
Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

I'm a great fan of 'SPF 5000': i.e., at home on the couch.

;o)  Rich