Sunshine heals cancer, and the FDA is powerless to stop it, regulate it or ban it
| Author |
Message |
|
Mark Prober
#16 / 23
|
 Sunshine heals cancer, and the FDA is powerless to stop it, regulate it or ban it Quote:
>>>> Thanks, Roman.
>>>> As usual our source of the truth.
>>> I was aware of this work, of course. Hence my carefully worded comment
>>> about observational studies indicating the possibility of a preventative
>>> role for Vitamin Din this very preliminary research. There is still no
>>> evidence that sunlight or Vitamin D can cure cancer - my main point.
>>> Interestingly, Australians have very high sun exposures, but Muslim women
>>> have low Vitamin D levels presumably through their dress.
>> Aussies just don't get enough sun, Peter, and that is why we have high
>> rates of cancer. I thought that you would know that.
>> From the Melanoma Foundation:
>> http://www.***.com/
>> "Melanoma is a major Australian health problem. Every year over 8,000
>> Australians are diagnosed with melanoma and more than 1,000
>> Australians die from melanoma.
>> "Australia has the highest incidence of melanoma in the world,
>> melanoma is the most common cancer in males aged 25 - 54 and in
>> females aged 15 - 29 years. It is the second most common cancer in
>> women 30 - 54 years of age and in the overall population of Australia,
>> melanoma now ranks as the third most common cancer".
>> When alternuts tell me that nobody ever gets cured of cancer, I simply
>> say "Twice". Left side of the nose, behind the right knee. I knew I
>> should have stayed in the pub instead of getting out in the surf on my
>> board, way back then when the world was young and there were no
>> lightweight wetsuits or water-resistant sunblock. But it was a Malibu
>> ...
> I'm a great fan of 'SPF 5000': i.e., at home on the couch.
> ;o) Rich
We are now marketing a new brand of blocker called Chernobyl, and it is tested in the Ukraine... So far, it has glowing testimoanials....
|
| Tue, 14 Oct 2008 22:06:21 GMT |
|
 |
|
Jeff
#17 / 23
|
Sunshine heals cancer, and the FDA is powerless to stop it, regulate it or ban it
Quote: > FYI
The article talks about the survival of people with skin cancer, not the causes. It states that people with melonoma who wree exposed to the sun were more likely to survive. However, it does not say that people who were exposed to the sun were less likely to get the cancer in the first place. Jeff
Quote: > Roman Bystrianyk, "Sun Exposure Increases Survival from Melanoma", > Health Sentinel, March 8, 2005, > According to the Mayo Clinic, skin cancer is the most common cancer in
> the United States. The incidence of skin cancers has been increasing
> for the last 50 years in all developed countries. Mortality from skin
> cancers has also been increasing, although not as greatly as the
> incidence. All forms of skin cancer have been on the rise. More benign
> forms include basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas. However, the
> greatest rise has been in melanoma, which is the most serious and most
> deadly type of skin cancer. The percentage of people with melanoma has
> more than doubled over the last 30 years.
> Because of the consistent findings that intermittent sun exposure is
> associated with an increased risk for melanoma, public health officials
> have recommended that excessive sun exposure should be avoided.
> Recommendations generally include avoiding sun exposure and use of
> sunscreens throughout the year.
> A recent study in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute
> contradicts this advice. The study looked at 528 melanoma patients who
> were entered in the Connecticut Tumor Registry. They examined a number
> of factors to determine the risks related to death from melanoma.
> They found that sunburn, high intermittent sun exposure, solar
> elastosis, which is a marker of sun damage, and self-reported skin
> awareness were all linked to improved survival from melanoma. "Sun
> exposure was statistically significantly inversely associated with risk
> of death from melanoma, regardless of the measure used. Individuals who
> has ever been severely burned or who has high levels of intermittent
> sun exposure were less likely to die from melanoma than individuals who
> had never been severely sunburned or who had low levels of intermittent
> sun exposure respectively."
> The authors also found that, "recent sunscreen use nor childhood
> sunscreen use were statistically associated with the risk of death from
> melanoma." They did find that individuals who paid attention to their
> skin have a lower risk of death from melanoma, however, "reported
> skin self-examination and physician skin examination were not
> significantly associated with the risk of death from melanoma."
> Attempting to explain their findings the authors note that sun exposure
> is essential for the skin to make vitamin D3. Vitamin D has been shown
> to be anticancer in nature and therefore could explain the beneficial
> association between sun exposure and survival from melanoma. Another
> possibility put forward is that sun exposure induces less aggressive
> melanoma by increasing the DNA repair capacity and thus reducing
> further more deadly changes in melanoma.
> The authors conclude that, "we found that intermittent sun exposure
> may increase survival from melanoma. If these results are confirmed,
> our findings have the potential to lead to interventions, such as
> stimulation of the vitamin D pathway or DNA repair capacity, that would
> increase survival from melanoma and, perhaps, from other cancers."
> SOURCE: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, February 2, 2005
|
| Wed, 15 Oct 2008 11:25:55 GMT |
|
|
|
Jan Dre
#18 / 23
|
Sunshine heals cancer, and the FDA is powerless to stop it, regulate it or ban it
Quote:
>> FYI
> The article talks about the survival of people with skin cancer, not the
> causes.
The authors also found that, "recent sunscreen use nor childhood Quote: > sunscreen use were statistically associated with the risk of death from
> melanoma."
It states that people with melonoma who wree exposed to the sun were Quote: > more likely to survive. However, it does not say that people who were > exposed to the sun were less likely to get the cancer in the first place. > Jeff
>> Roman Bystrianyk, "Sun Exposure Increases Survival from Melanoma",
>> Health Sentinel, March 8, 2005,
>> According to the Mayo Clinic, skin cancer is the most common cancer in
>> the United States. The incidence of skin cancers has been increasing
>> for the last 50 years in all developed countries. Mortality from skin
>> cancers has also been increasing, although not as greatly as the
>> incidence. All forms of skin cancer have been on the rise. More benign
>> forms include basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas. However, the
>> greatest rise has been in melanoma, which is the most serious and most
>> deadly type of skin cancer. The percentage of people with melanoma has
>> more than doubled over the last 30 years.
>> Because of the consistent findings that intermittent sun exposure is
>> associated with an increased risk for melanoma, public health officials
>> have recommended that excessive sun exposure should be avoided.
>> Recommendations generally include avoiding sun exposure and use of
>> sunscreens throughout the year.
>> A recent study in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute
>> contradicts this advice. The study looked at 528 melanoma patients who
>> were entered in the Connecticut Tumor Registry. They examined a number
>> of factors to determine the risks related to death from melanoma.
>> They found that sunburn, high intermittent sun exposure, solar
>> elastosis, which is a marker of sun damage, and self-reported skin
>> awareness were all linked to improved survival from melanoma. "Sun
>> exposure was statistically significantly inversely associated with risk
>> of death from melanoma, regardless of the measure used. Individuals who
>> has ever been severely burned or who has high levels of intermittent
>> sun exposure were less likely to die from melanoma than individuals who
>> had never been severely sunburned or who had low levels of intermittent
>> sun exposure respectively."
>> The authors also found that, "recent sunscreen use nor childhood
>> sunscreen use were statistically associated with the risk of death from
>> melanoma." They did find that individuals who paid attention to their
>> skin have a lower risk of death from melanoma, however, "reported
>> skin self-examination and physician skin examination were not
>> significantly associated with the risk of death from melanoma."
>> Attempting to explain their findings the authors note that sun exposure
>> is essential for the skin to make vitamin D3. Vitamin D has been shown
>> to be anticancer in nature and therefore could explain the beneficial
>> association between sun exposure and survival from melanoma. Another
>> possibility put forward is that sun exposure induces less aggressive
>> melanoma by increasing the DNA repair capacity and thus reducing
>> further more deadly changes in melanoma.
>> The authors conclude that, "we found that intermittent sun exposure
>> may increase survival from melanoma. If these results are confirmed,
>> our findings have the potential to lead to interventions, such as
>> stimulation of the vitamin D pathway or DNA repair capacity, that would
>> increase survival from melanoma and, perhaps, from other cancers."
>> SOURCE: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, February 2, 2005
|
| Wed, 15 Oct 2008 11:53:16 GMT |
|
|
|
verno
#19 / 23
|
Sunshine heals cancer, and the FDA is powerless to stop it, regulate it or ban it
Quote:
>> FYI
> The article talks about the survival of people with skin cancer, not the
> causes. It states that people with melonoma who wree exposed to the sun
> were more likely to survive. However, it does not say that people who were
> exposed to the sun were less likely to get the cancer in the first place.
> Jeff
History does poo poo the concept that sun exposure causes anything other than good health. Excessive intermittent "burning" has a possibility that has "NEVER" been proven in real research. It is just that cancer often comes from repeated damage.
|
| Wed, 15 Oct 2008 21:44:48 GMT |
|
|
|
john
#20 / 23
|
Sunshine heals cancer, and the FDA is powerless to stop it, regulate it or ban it People are confusing me with you, I suggest you take up this wondeful offer: Dear Peter Bowditch,
My name is Mark Anderson. I am the Regional manager of Barclays Bank of Togo
Limited, Takoradi branch in the Western region of Togo. I am a man of peace,
married with two lovely kids. I never want problems in my life, it was just
because of my present financial situation that I have carefully planned to
utilize this opportunity that came my way, and I only hope you can assist me
not to persecute me. If you don't want this proposal, can you kindly forget
that I ever contacted you. I will be glad you did for the sake of my job.
I have packaged a financial transaction that will benefit you and I, as the
Regional manager of the Barclays Bank, it is my duty to send in a financial
report to my head office in the capital city, Lome,at the end of each
business year. In the course of last year 2005; business report, I
discovered that my branch in which I am the manager, made Five million,six
hundred US dollars (US$5,600,000) which my head office
is not aware of and will never be aware of.
I have placed this funds on what we call escrow call account with any
beneficiary.As an officer of this bank, I cannot be directly connected to
this money, so my aim of contacting you is to assist me receive this money
in your bank account and get 30% of the total funds as commission.
There are practically no risk involved, it will be a bank to bank transfer,
all I need from you is to stand claim as the original depositor of this
funds, who made the deposit with my branch so that my head office can order
the transfer to your designated bank account. If you accept to work with me,
I will appreciate it very much.my email is as above. email me if you think
we can work together so that we can go over the details.
Thank you in advance and may God bless you and your family.I will provide
you with all the necessary documents on how to go about this transaction.
Regards,
Mark Anderson
Mobile: 0022 8918 6193.
|
| Thu, 16 Oct 2008 02:49:27 GMT |
|
|
|
#21 / 23
|
Sunshine heals cancer, and the FDA is powerless to stop it, regulate it or ban it
|
| Fri, 19 Jun 1992 00:00:00 GMT |
|
|
|
Fuck Googl
#22 / 23
|
Sunshine heals cancer, and the FDA is powerless to stop it, regulate it or ban it
Quote:
> >>>> Thanks, Roman.
> >>>> As usual our source of the truth.
> >>> I was aware of this work, of course. Hence my carefully worded
comment
> >>> about observational studies indicating the possibility of a
preventative
> >>> role for Vitamin Din this very preliminary research. There is still
no
> >>> evidence that sunlight or Vitamin D can cure cancer - my main point.
> >>> Interestingly, Australians have very high sun exposures, but Muslim
women
> >>> have low Vitamin D levels presumably through their dress.
> >> Aussies just don't get enough sun, Peter, and that is why we have high
> >> rates of cancer. I thought that you would know that.
> >> From the Melanoma Foundation:
> >> http://www.melanomafoundation.com.au/MACb.html
> >> "Melanoma is a major Australian health problem. Every year over 8,000
> >> Australians are diagnosed with melanoma and more than 1,000
> >> Australians die from melanoma.
> >> "Australia has the highest incidence of melanoma in the world,
> >> melanoma is the most common cancer in males aged 25 - 54 and in
> >> females aged 15 - 29 years. It is the second most common cancer in
> >> women 30 - 54 years of age and in the overall population of Australia,
> >> melanoma now ranks as the third most common cancer".
> >> When alternuts tell me that nobody ever gets cured of cancer, I simply
> >> say "Twice". Left side of the nose, behind the right knee. I knew I
> >> should have stayed in the pub instead of getting out in the surf on my
> >> board, way back then when the world was young and there were no
> >> lightweight wetsuits or water-resistant sunblock. But it was a Malibu
> >> ...
> > I'm a great fan of 'SPF 5000': i.e., at home on the couch.
> > ;o) Rich
> We are now marketing a new brand of blocker called Chernobyl, and it is
> tested in the Ukraine...
> So far, it has glowing testimoanials....
|
| Sat, 18 Oct 2008 05:38:45 GMT |
|
|
|
Fuck Googl
#23 / 23
|
Sunshine heals cancer, and the FDA is powerless to stop it, regulate it or ban it
Stuart hydernan hyderman stuart
Quote:
> >>>> Thanks, Roman.
> >>>> As usual our source of the truth.
> >>> I was aware of this work, of course. Hence my carefully worded
comment
> >>> about observational studies indicating the possibility of a
preventative
> >>> role for Vitamin Din this very preliminary research. There is still
no
> >>> evidence that sunlight or Vitamin D can cure cancer - my main point.
> >>> Interestingly, Australians have very high sun exposures, but Muslim
women
> >>> have low Vitamin D levels presumably through their dress.
> >> Aussies just don't get enough sun, Peter, and that is why we have high
> >> rates of cancer. I thought that you would know that.
> >> From the Melanoma Foundation:
> >> http://www.melanomafoundation.com.au/MACb.html
> >> "Melanoma is a major Australian health problem. Every year over 8,000
> >> Australians are diagnosed with melanoma and more than 1,000
> >> Australians die from melanoma.
> >> "Australia has the highest incidence of melanoma in the world,
> >> melanoma is the most common cancer in males aged 25 - 54 and in
> >> females aged 15 - 29 years. It is the second most common cancer in
> >> women 30 - 54 years of age and in the overall population of Australia,
> >> melanoma now ranks as the third most common cancer".
> >> When alternuts tell me that nobody ever gets cured of cancer, I simply
> >> say "Twice". Left side of the nose, behind the right knee. I knew I
> >> should have stayed in the pub instead of getting out in the surf on my
> >> board, way back then when the world was young and there were no
> >> lightweight wetsuits or water-resistant sunblock. But it was a Malibu
> >> ...
> > I'm a great fan of 'SPF 5000': i.e., at home on the couch.
> > ;o) Rich
> We are now marketing a new brand of blocker called Chernobyl, and it is
> tested in the Ukraine...
> So far, it has glowing testimoanials....
|
| Sat, 18 Oct 2008 22:08:15 GMT |
|
| |
Page 2 of 2
|
[ 23 post ] |
|
Go to page:
[1]
[2] |
|
