Towards an operating system for brain hacking 
Author Message
 Towards an operating system for brain hacking


Towards an operating system for brain hacking
Electronic devices that interface directly with the brain are now being produced by labs
around the world but each new device tends to work in a completely different way. An
article in Technology Review argues that we need an agreed neural operating system so
brain-machine interfaces can more easily work together.
Although current devices tend only to measure brain activity or stimulate cortical areas,
it won't be very long before devices typically do both - detecting and reacting to neural
states - possibly forming a dynamic network of electronic devices that regulate brain

To avoid the 'Mac vs PC problem of the brain', neuroscientist Ed Boyden highlights the
importance of having devices that speak a common language to avoid both wasted scientific
effort and potentially dangerous miscommunication.

  Some examples of this kind of "brain coprocessor" technology are under active
development, such as systems that perturb the epileptic brain when a seizure is
electrically observed, and prosthetics for amputees that record nerves to control
artificial limbs and stimulate nerves to provide sensory feedback. Looking down the line,
such system architectures might be capable of very advanced functions-providing
just-in-time information to the brain of a patient with dementia to augment cognition, or
sculpting the risk-taking profile of an {*filter*}ion patient in the presence of stimuli that
prompt cravings.

  Given the ever-increasing number of brain readout and control technologies available, a
generalized brain coprocessor architecture could be enabled by defining common interfaces
governing how component technologies talk to one another, as well as an "operating system"
that defines how the overall system works as a unified whole-analogous to the way personal
computers govern the interaction of their component hard drives, memories, processors, and

Although not mentioned in the article, another advantage of a common platform for brain
devices would be security, as current devices as often completely open and designed to be
easily controllable from the outside.

Thu, 21 Aug 2014 17:10:56 GMT
 [ 1 post ] 

 Relevant Pages 

1. Notable Advances Towards Treatment of Solid Tumor Brain Cancer

2. [Notable Advances Towards Treatment of Solid Tumor Brain Cancer]

3. Axon Systems neuromonitors for Intensive Care and Operating Room

4. The Next Hacking Frontier: Your Brain?

5. The ultimate hack: Reverse engineering the human brain

6. The ultimate hack: Reverse engineering the human brain

7. 3 Memory Systems of animals (1) DNA (2) Brain (3) Hydrogen-Bonds

8. Manual for Brain Quick System II (Biomed)

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software