Boyd Haley's Response to Article (Mercury Fillings: They're Not Risky ) 
Author Message
 Boyd Haley's Response to Article (Mercury Fillings: They're Not Risky )

Sent to me by Boyd Haley.......
Thank you Dr. Haley.......

I have also put this as a document file on my website.......
http://www.***.com/ ~wwithin/BoydHaleyFDAAmalgamResponse.doc

Sheri

MERCURY FILLINGS: THEY'RE NOT RISKY:  RESPONSE TO ARTICLE IS IN UNDERLINED
CAPS IN THE ORIGINAL TEXT AND ARE THE OPINIONS AND STATEMENTS BY DR. BOYD
HALEY, PROFESSOR OF CHEMISTRY, UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY, LEXINGTON, KY.
40506-0055

INTRODUCTION;  AFTER READING THIS PRESS RELEASE I AM VERY CONCERNED THAT
THERE WAS VERY LITTLE CREDIBLE EFFORT FOR TRUTH EXHIBITED BY THE NIDCR
PANEL THAT WAS CONVIENED TO EVALUATE THE TOXIC EXPOSURE TO MERCURY FROM
DENTAL AMALGAMS.  SEE THE INCREDIBLE STATEMENT AT THE START OF THIS ARTICLE
"MERCURY VAPORS NOT EASILY ABSORBED BY BODY"  NOTHING COULD BE FURTHER FROM
THE TRUTH SCIENTIFICALLY.  MERCURY VAPORS, RELEASED IN THE MOUTH FROM
DENTAL AMALGAMS, HAVE BEEN PROVEN TO BE THE MOST READILY ABSORBED FORM OF
MERCURY BY THE HUMAN BODY.  THIS ARTICLE, AND THE SUPPORTING COMMENTS BY
PANEL MEMBERS AND DENTISTS, REPRESENTS AN INTELLECTUAL TRAVESITY AND AN
ETHICAL FAILURE OF THE GOVERNMENT AND DENTAL AGENCIES WHOSE ASSIGNMENT IS
TO PROTECT AMERICANS, ESPECIALLY AMERCIAN CHILDREN, FROM EXPOSURE TO
NEUROTOXINS.  THIS IS WHY WE MUST TAKE ACTION AT THE STATE LEGISLATIVE
LEVEL TO BUILD ADDITIONAL FIREWALLS AGAINST TOXIC EXPOSURES ALLOWED, AND
INDIRECTLY ENCOURAGED, BY THE FDA AND CDC.

http://www.***.com/

Mercury Fillings: They're Not Risky

Mercury Vapors Not Easily Absorbed by Body A TOTAL FABRICATION!  80% OF
INHALED MERCURY VAPORS ARE RETAINED BY THE BODY.

By Jeanie Lerche Davis
WebMD Medical News Reviewed By Brunilda  Nazario, MD
on Thursday, December 09, 2004
More From WebMD

Dec. 9, 2004 -- Mercury in dental fillings does not cause Alzheimer's
disease, multiple sclerosis, or other health problems, according to a new
review of all current research. NOT A PROVEN STATEMENT AT ALL. FOR EXAMPLE,
MERCURY, AND MERCURY ALONE OF ALL MATERIALS TESTED, HAS BEEN ABLE TO
PRODUCE THE ABERRANT BIOCHEMICAL EFFECTS SEEN IN ALZHEIMER'S DISEASED BRAIN
(INHIBITION OF CREATINE KINASE, GLUTAMINE SYNTHETASE AND TUBULIN VIABILITY
PLUS CAUSING A DISRUPTION OF MICROTUBULES INTO ABNORMAL AGGREGRATION OF
TUBULIN INTO INSOLUBLE BODIES).  IN ADDITION, MERCURY AND ONLY MERCURY, IS
CAPABLE IN TEST SYSTEMS TO CAUSE THE PRODUCTION OF NEUROFIBILLARY TANGLES,
INCREASE HYPERPHOSPHORYLATED TAU AND INCREASE THE PRODUCTION OF
BETA-AMYLOID PROTEIN THAT AGREEGATES INTO SENILE PLACQUES. THESE REPRESENT
THE THREE MOST WIDELY ACCEPTED PATHOLOGICAL DIAGNOSTIC HALLMARKS OF
ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE.

THE HYPOTHESIS OF MERCURY INVOLVEMENT IN ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE WAS REVIEWED
AND SUPPORTED BY GERMAN AND SWISS SCIENTISTS UNIVERSITY RESEARCHERS AND
RECENTLY PUBLISHED (Mutter et al., Alzheimer's Disease; Mercury as a
Pathogenetic Factor and APO-E as a Moderator. Neuroendocrinology Letters,
#5 October issue, 2004, www.nel.edu). THE OPINION OF THESE AUTHORS IS IN
LINE WITH THE INCREASED PHASING OUT OF AMALGAM USAGE IN EUROPE.  IN MY
OPINION, IT IS THE FEAR OF LEGAL ACTION THAT CAUSES THE AMERICAN DENTAL
ASSOCIATION (ADA) AND THE NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF DENTAL AND CRANIO{*filter*}
RESEARCH (NIDCR) AND THEIR SUPPRESSION OF THE FACTS RELATED TO MERCURY
EMISSION FROM AMALGAMS THAT KEEPS ACCEPTANCE OF THE DANGER OF LONG TERM
MERCURY EXPOSURE FROM BEING CONSIDERED A CAUSAL OR EXACERBATING FACTOR IN
NEUROLOGICAL DISEASES.  A LARGE AMOUNT OF RESEARCH HAS BEEN PUBLISHED IN
SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS TO BACK MY STATEMENTS REGARDING THIS ISSUE. MANY OF
THESE PAPERS CAN BE FOUND AT www.altcorp.com under dental information and
http://www.***.com/ , http://www.***.com/ ,
http://www.***.com/ ,
www.home.earthlink.net/~berniew1(Bernie Windham),

www.uninformedconsent.com (shows Hg vapor from amalgams on video),
http://www.***.com/ ;(discusses new ideas about
AD)
http://www.***.com/ , www.doh.wa.gov/fish/FishAdvMercury.htm,
www.epa.gov/mercury/ http://www.***.com/ ,
< http://www.***.com/ ;

THERE IS A TOTAL LACK OF HIGH QUALITY EPIDEMIOLOGICAL RESEARCH THAT WOULD
SHOW AMALGAMS TO BE CAUSAL OR SAFE AND NOT INVOLVED IN HUMAN HEALTH
PROBLEMS.  IN THE USA THE ADA, FDA, NIH AND ESPECIALLY NIDCR HAVE TOTALLY
DROPPED THE BALL IN REGARDS TO DOING SIGNIFICANT STUDIES IN THIS AREA AS
THEY ARE THE ONLY AGENCIES WITH THE FUNDS AND DATA BASES AVAILABLE FOR SUCH
RESEARCH.  HOWEVER RESEARCH FROM SWEDEN HAS DEMONSTRATED THAT REMOVAL OF
DENTAL AMALGAMS FROM ABOUT 700 SUBJECTS WITH NEUROLOGICAL PROBLEMS LEAD TO
CLINICAL IMPROVEMENTS IN ABOUT 70% OF THE SUBJECTS, ALONG WITH A
SIGNIFICANT DROP IN THE {*filter*} MERCURY LEVELS OF THE SUBJECTS.  THERE ARE
ALSO REPORTS THAT INDIVIDUALS WITH MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS HAD LESS DELETERIOUS
EVENTS WHEN THEIR AMALGAMS WERE REMOVED.  RESEARCH HAS SHOWN THAT
INDIVIDUALS WHO DIED OF IDIOPATHIC DIALATED CARDIOMYOPATHY HAVE 20,000
TIMES MORE MERCURY IN THEIR HEART TISSUE THAN FOUND IN OTHER FORMS OF HEART
DISEASE.  THIS WAS PUBLISHED IN A 1999 ISSUE OF THE J. OF AMERICAN
CARDIOL0GY. YET NO NIH GRANTS OR PROGRAMS HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED TO PURSUE
THIS LEAD.  THIS IS CONSISTENT WITH AMERICAN NIH SUPPORTED RESEARCH TO
NEVER FOLLOW UP ON NUMEROUS SUCH LEADS AS THESE IF MERCURY IS IMPLICATED.
SO WE SHOULD NOT BE SURPRISED TO SEE AN NIDCR SPONSORED AND ORCHESTRATED
REVIEW PANEL COME TO THE DECISION THAT AMALGAMS ARE SAFE.  DON'T LOOK FOR
CAUSES OF MERCURY INDUCED DISEASES AND YOU WON'T FIND ANY SEEMS TO BE THE
MANTRA OF THE NIDCR AND NIH.

BUT WE MUST ALSO ASK OURSELVES WHY WE CANNOT FIND, AFTER SPENDING BILLIONS
OF TAX DOLLARS,  THE CAUSE OF ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE, MS, ALS, AND PARKINSON'S
WHILE WE READILY FIND THE CAUSE OF DISEASES LIKE AIDS, POLIO, ETC.  I THINK
IT IS IT BECAUSE SCIENTISTS ARE NOT FUNDED TO LOOK FOR CAUSATION IN CERTAIN
AREAS, LIKE HEAVY METAL OR MERCURY TOXICITY.  WE HAVE SOLVED NUMEROUS OTHER
DISEASES, BUT NOT THE NEUROLOGICAL DISEASES MENTIONED ABOVE.  IF THESE
DISEASES HAVE THEIR BASIS IN MERCURY EXPOSURE THEN WE WILL NEVER SOLVE THEM
FOLLOWING THE PATH OF IGNORING BASIC RESEARCH IN THE AREA OF MERCURY
TOXICITY AND JUST BELIEVING WHAT THE DENTAL ESTABLISHMENT TELLS US.  ARE WE
TO BE DUMB ENOUGH TO BELIEVE THAT NEWLY PLACED DENTAL AMALGAMS, WHICH
CONTAIN ABOUT 500,000 MICROGRAMS MERCURY/GRAM AMALGAM, WHICH BREAK DOWN AND
NEED REPLACEMENT DO NOT LOSE A HUGE AMOUNT OF MERCURY IN THE NUMBER OF
YEARS THEY ARE IN OUR MOUTHS, AND THAT THIS MERCURY ENDS UP IN OUR CENTRAL
NERVOUS SYSTEM?

IF A SINGLE SMALL ONE GRAM AMALGAM LOST 5 TO 10 MICROGRAMS PER DAY (A TOXIC
EXPOSURE) THEN IT WOULD TAKE ABOUT 137 TO 274 YEARS TO LOSE ALL THE
MERCURY. ALSO, IF 5 TO 10 MICROGRAMS PER DAY WERE LOST FROM THIS AMALGAM
THIS WOULD AMOUNT TO 0.365% TO 0.73% OF THE MERCURY PER YEAR.  SO YOU DON'T
HAVE TO HAVE A GREAT LOSS PER YEAR TO EXPERIENCE A TOXIC EXPOSURE.

But will this put to rest the concerns many people have?

It's a sensitive issue. Methyl mercury is the type found in fish, and has
been found harmful to the brain in large amounts. The EPA advises women to
avoid eating mercury-rich fish during pregnancy for that reason. FIRST, ALL
STUDIES ON POPULATIONS WITH DENTAL AMALGAMS AND FISH CONSUMPTION HAVE SHOWN
THAT THE MAJOR CONTRIBUTOR TO MERCURY BODY BURDEN IS THE SUBJECTS DENTAL
AMALGAMS, NOT FISH.  SO TO SPEAK, THE DENTAL CLAIM THA FISH IS THE MAJOR
EXPOSURE TO HUMANS IS A RED HERRING.

FURTHER, MERCURY VAPORS FROM DENTAL AMALGAMS ENTER THE BRAIN WITH EASE AND
ARE OXIDIZED TO Hg2+, THE TOXIC FORM, AND CAUSE DAMAGE TO THE SAME
BIOCHEMICAL SYSTEMS FOUND DAMAGED IN ALZHEIMER'S DISEASED BRAIN.  THIS HAS
BEEN PROVEN BY EXPOSING RATS TO MERCURY VAPOR AND BY EXPOSING NEURONS IN
CULTURE TO Hg2+.  SEVERAL STUDIES, INCLUDING ONE FROM THE NIH, HAVE SHOWN
THAT DENTAL AMALGAMS ARE THE MAJOR CONTRIBUTOR TO HUMAN BODY BURDEN. WHY
WOULD ANY ONE WITH GOOD SENSE RECOMMEND PLACING A MATERIAL IN HUMAN MOUTHS
THAT CAN EASILY BE SHOWN TO RELEASE MERCURY AT A CONSTANT RATE FOR MANY
YEARS?  ESPECIALLY KNOWING THAT MERCURY CONCENTRATES IN THE FETUS WITH AN
AVERAGE OF MERCURY IN THE INFANTS CORD {*filter*} BEING 1.7 TIMES THAT IN THE
BIRTH MOTHER {*filter*}.

However, mercury in dental fillings is a different type of chemical
compound -- an amalgam or blend of copper, silver, and mercury. Dentists
have used this blended metal for more than 150 years. But over the years,
concerns about mercury fillings have been raised, writes Meryl Karol, PhD,
an epidemiologist with the University of Pittsburgh School of Public
Health.  THE INITIAL SENTENCE IS A TOTALLY INCORRECT STATEMENT ON THE
CHEMICAL LEVEL.  MERCURY IS AN ELEMENT NOT A COMPOUND.  THE MERCURY THAT IS
EMITTED FROM A DENTAL AMALGAM IS PURE MERCURY VAPOR AND ITS RELEASE CAN BE
MEASURED AND QUANTIFIED QUITE EASILY.  USING A MERCURY VAPOR SNIFFER OR,
FOR MORE ELEGANT EXPERIMENTS, BY USING A MERCURY COLD-VAPOR ANALYZER AFTER
COLLECTING THE WATER IN WHICH AN AMALGAM HAS BEEN PLACED FOR A FEW HOURS OR
LESS, HAVE CONFIRMED THE RELEASE OF MERCURY FROM DENTAL AMALGAMS.  ALSO,
THE WEBSITES AT www.uninformedconsent.com and www.iaomt.org HAVE VIDEOS OF
MERCURY VAPORS ESCAPING FROM DENTAL AMALGAMS NOT UNLIKE SOME COMING FROM A
CIGARETTE.

FURTHER, ELECTRON MICROSCOPY OF DENTAL AMALGAMS CLEARLY SHOWS DROPLETS OF
MERCURY LIQUID IN DENTAL AMALGAM PORES.  HEATING THE AMALGAM RELEASES THIS
MERCURY QUICKLY AND CAUSES THE DROPLETS TO DISSAPPEAR.  A MASSIVE GERMAN
UNIVERSITY STUDY FOUND TOXIC LEVELS OF MERCURY IN THE SALIVA OF SEVERAL
THOUSANDS OF SUBJECTS AND THE AMOUNT WAS CORRELATED TO DENTAL AMALGAMS.

THERE IS NO SCIENTIFIC CONTROVERSY ABOUT THE NATURE AND AMOUNT OF MERCURY
BEING EMITTED FROM A DENTAL AMALGAM.  THE ONLY CONTROVERSEY IS MAINTAINED
BY THE INACCURATE AND MANIPULATED DATA (AS WELL AS CONGRESSIONAL LOBBYING
EFFORTS) PUT FORTH BY THE PRO-AMALGAM ELEMENTS IN ...

read more »



Fri, 01 Jun 2007 06:02:34 GMT
 Boyd Haley's Response to Article (Mercury Fillings: They're Not Risky )
One single statement in this reveals Boyd Haley's utter naivety when it
comes to clinical matters.

"HOWEVER RESEARCH FROM SWEDEN HAS DEMONSTRATED THAT REMOVAL OF
DENTAL AMALGAMS FROM ABOUT 700 SUBJECTS WITH NEUROLOGICAL PROBLEMS LEAD TO
CLINICAL IMPROVEMENTS IN ABOUT 70% OF THE SUBJECTS, ALONG WITH A SIGNIGIFANT
DROP IN MERCURY LEVELS"

 Who would ever doubt that if you tell a lot of  people with vague illness
that they are probably being poisoned by their amalgams, and then remove the
amalgams, there would be a lot of reported "clinical improvements"?

A sham operation was able to to produce excellent or moderate improvement in
asthmatics in 70- 80% of cases in just such uncontrolled studies!!

Peter Moran



Sat, 02 Jun 2007 04:20:08 GMT
 Boyd Haley's Response to Article (Mercury Fillings: They're Not Risky )

Thinks mercury is perfectly safe to put into teeth and babies.   Are you
sure that is the correct spelling of your name?



Sat, 02 Jun 2007 15:58:05 GMT
 Boyd Haley's Response to Article (Mercury Fillings: They're Not Risky )


Quote:


> Thinks mercury is perfectly safe to put into teeth and babies.   Are you
> sure that is the correct spelling of your name?

oooh...John is using ad hominem....

whines when it is done to him



Sat, 02 Jun 2007 22:12:14 GMT
 Boyd Haley's Response to Article (Mercury Fillings: They're Not Risky )

Quote:


> Thinks mercury is perfectly safe to put into teeth and babies.   Are you
> sure that is the correct spelling of your name?

        #1. Babies don't get fillings.
        #2. Give me the Hg fillings any day -they stick better than the white
        crap.
        #3. Stress will kill you faster....you should be keelin' over any
        minute.
Let go.....Let God....


Tue, 05 Jun 2007 02:34:28 GMT
 Boyd Haley's Response to Article (Mercury Fillings: They're Not Risky )


Quote:
> Let go.....Let God....

weed you out


Sun, 10 Jun 2007 22:18:55 GMT
 
 [ 6 post ] 

 Relevant Pages 

1. Dr Boyd Haley's response to NY Daily News

2. FWD: Alzheimers---Response from Boyd E. Haley ,University of Kentucky

3. Chemist Boyd Haley's research interests!

4. More on Boyd Haley's business interests .....

5. Boyd Haley on fillings

6. Boyd Haley's academic freedom argument

7. Boyd Haley's for-profit products.

8. Re Dr Boyd Haley's publishing InfoPart 2

9. Re Dr Boyd Haley's Publishing Info Part 3

10. Dr Boyd Haley's Publishing Info

11. Why does Boyd Haley keep saying mercury amalgams?


 
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software