Deadly 1918 Epidemic Linked to Bird Flu, Scientists Say 
Author Message
 Deadly 1918 Epidemic Linked to Bird Flu, Scientists Say

New York Times
October 5, 2005

Deadly 1918 Epidemic Linked to Bird Flu, Scientists Say
By GINA KOLATA

Two teams of federal and university scientists announced today that
they had resurrected the 1918 influenza virus, the cause of one of
history's most deadly epidemics, and had found that unlike the viruses
that caused more recent flu pandemics of 1957 and 1968, the 1918 virus
was actually a bird flu that jumped directly to humans.

The work, being published in the journals Nature and Science, involved
getting the complete genetic sequence of the 1918 virus, using
techniques of molecular biology to synthesize it, and then using it to
infect mice and human lung cells in a specially equipped, secure lab
at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta.

The findings, the scientists say, reveal a small number of genetic
changes that may explain why this virus was so lethal. The work also
confirms the legitimacy of worries about the bird flu viruses that are
now emerging in Asia.

The new research indicates that the 1918 virus, unlike more recent flu
pandemics of 1957 and 1968, was actually a bird flu that jumped
directly to humans. The new studies find that today's bird flu viruses
share a few of the crucial genetic changes that occurred in the 1918
flu. The scientists suspect that with the 1918 flu, changes in just 25
to 30 out of about 4,400 amino acids in the viral proteins turned the
virus into a killer. The bird flus, known as H5N1 viruses, have a few,
but not all, of those changes.

In a joint statement, Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National
Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and Dr. Julie
Gerberding, director of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention,
said, "The new studies could have an immediate impact by helping
scientist focus on detecting changes in the evolving H5N1 virus that
might make widespread transmission among humans more likely."

The work also reveals that the 1918 virus is very different from
ordinary human flu viruses. It infects cells deep in the lungs of
mice, and infects lung cells, like the cells lining air sacs, that
normally would be impervious to flu. And while other human flu viruses
do not kill mice, this one, like today's bird flus, does.

But Dr. Jeffery Taubenberger, chief of molecular pathology department
at the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, notes that the bird flus
have not yet spread from human to human. He hopes the 1918 virus will
reveal what genetic changes can allow that to happen, helping
scientists prevent a new pandemic before it starts.

Scientists said the new work was immensely important, leading the way
to identifying dangerous viruses before it is too late and to finding
ways to disable them.

"This is huge, huge, huge," said John Oxford, a professor of virology
at London Hospital Medical College, who was not part of the research
team. "It's a huge breakthrough to be able to put a searchlight on a
virus that killed 50 million people. I can't think of anything bigger
that's happened in virology for many years."

The 1918 flu showed how terrible that disease could be. It had been
"like a dark angel hovering over us," Dr. Oxford said. The virus
spread and killed with terrifying speed, preferentially striking the
young and the healthy. Alfred C. Crosby, author of "America's
Forgotten Pandemic: The Influenza of 1918," wrote that it "killed more
humans than any other disease in a similar duration in the history of
the world."

But the research, and its publication, also raised concerns about
whether scientists should publish the genetic sequence of the 1918
virus. And should they actually resurrect a killer that vanished from
the earth nearly a century ago?

"It is something we take seriously," said Dr. Fauci of the National
Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, which helped pay for the
work. The work was extensively reviewed, he added, and the National
Scientific Advisory Board for Biosecurity was asked to decide whether
the results should be made public. The board "voted unanimously that
the benefits outweighed the risk that it would be used in a nefarious
manner," Dr. Fauci said.

Dr. D. A. Henderson, a resident scholar at the Center for Biosecurity
at the University of Pittsburgh and a leading expert on bioterrorism,
said he agreed with the decision.

"This work is of the greatest importance," he said, "and it is very
important that it be published."

The story of the resurrection of the 1918 flu began in 1995, when Dr.
Taubenberger had an idea. He knew about the 1918 flu and the horrors
of that pandemic. Medical authorities at the time found it hard even
to describe the devastation. At Fort Devens, wrote one doctor, Victor
Vaughan, they saw young soldiers' "bodies stacked like cordwood," dead
from the flu. The epidemic, he added, "visited the remotest corners,
taking toll of the most robust, sparing neither soldier nor civilian,
and flaunting its red flag in the face of science."

It had seemed hopeless, though, to discover what that virus looked
like. Viruses had not been discovered in 1918 and so no one had
isolated and saved the one causing that flu. But Dr. Taubenberger
recalled that his institute had a warehouse of autopsy tissue,
established by President Abraham Lincoln, who had ordered that every
time a military doctor examined a patient and took a tissue sample, a
sample must also be sent to and stored at the pathology institute. Dr.
Taubenberger wondered if he could find lung tissue from soldiers who
died of the 1918 flu and, if so, if he could extract the virus.

He found tissue from two soldiers, snips of lung soaked in formalin
and encased in little blocks of wax. And in that tissue was the virus,
broken and degraded, just a few molecules of virus, but there.

One of the patients was Roscoe Vaughan, who got the flu when he was 21
years old and training at Camp Jackson, S.C. On Sept. 19, 1918, he
reported to sick call. He died on Sept. 26, unable to breathe, the air
sacs in his lungs filled with fluid. The other patient was James Down,
age 30, who died on the same day at Camp Upton, in New York. The
snippets of their lung tissue had remained untouched for nearly 80
years.

Then Dr. Taubenberger got a third sample, from a woman who had died in
Alaska when the flu swept through her village, killing 72 {*filter*}s,
leaving just 5. The dead were buried in a mass grave in the
permafrost, and a retired pathologist, Johann Hultin, hearing of Dr.
Taubenberger's quest, traveled from his home in San Francisco to the
gravesite in Alaska at his own expense, dug up the grave with the
villager's permission, extracted the woman's still frozen lung tissue,
and sent it to Dr. Taubenberger.

Dr. Taubenberger and his colleagues spent nearly a decade carefully
extracting and piecing together the viral genes, like putting together
a jigsaw puzzle. Along the way, they published findings that they and
others used to try to understand the 1918 flu, but until now they had
only published the sequences of five of the eight genes. The last
three, which make up half the virus's length, are published in their
paper, in Nature.

In August, Terrence M. Tumpey of the Centers for Disease Control and
his colleagues used that information to reconstruct the 1918 virus and
ask what would happen if they infected mice and if they infected
tissue from human lungs. And, they asked, would the virus remain as
lethal if they switched some of its genes with genes from today's
influenza viruses?

The scientists took great precautions, the director of the C.D.C.,
Julie Gerberding, said at a news conference, using special labs that
were designed to protect the researchers and prevent the spread of the
viruses. "We have erred on the side of caution at every step of the
process," Dr. Gerberding said.

And now, the scientists say, they are starting to unmask that virus's
secrets.

In gene-swapping experiments, for example, they put the hemagglutinin
gene from the 1918 virus for one from a more recent human virus.
Suddenly, the reconstructed virus could no longer replicate in the
lungs of mice and no longer killed the animals. It also could not
attach itself to human lung cells in the lab. Yet the 1918 virus'
hemagglutinin protein differs in just two critical amino acids from
the protein of a typical avian flu virus.

"Now we've shown experimentally that those two changes are crucial for
human adaptation," Dr. Taubenberger said. So far, he added, they have
not been seen in the Asian bird flus.

The ultimate goal, he says, is to make a checklist of changes to look
for in the bird viruses.

"Now you have all these viruses going around and we don't know, Is it
going to adapt to humans? Is it going to cause a pandemic? We don't
understand the rules," Dr. Taubenberger said. "There is a lot of
science to go."



Mon, 24 Mar 2008 01:22:35 GMT
 Deadly 1918 Epidemic Linked to Bird Flu, Scientists Say
"achoo!"
~ Folly


Mon, 24 Mar 2008 03:03:58 GMT
 
 [ 2 post ] 

 Relevant Pages 

1. Re-Creation of 1918-19 Virus Suggests Bigger Bird-Flu Threat

2. Sauerkraut could fight bird flu, say scientists

3. 1918 INFLUENZA EPIDEMIC

4. Why little public awareness of 1918 flu pandemic?

5. Bird Flu epidemic in China?

6. Bird Flu epidemic in China?

7. Scientists warn that the H1N1 Pan-Flu virus could mutate into a deadlier form

8. Scientists warn that the H1N1 Pan-Flu virus could mutate into a deadlier form

9. Scientists discover new bird flu strain that evades all vaccines and eradication measures

10. Just say NO to the bird flu.


 
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software