Sinus Retention Cyst Question to ENT's 
Author Message
 Sinus Retention Cyst Question to ENT's

Well, what a medical odyssey this has been.  After two ENTs,
two CT scans (radial and coronal), and many sleepless
nights, I have been diagnosed with a rather large "retention
cyst" in my right maxillary sinus (2mm X 2cm). ENT1 wanted
to Caldwell-Luc it out my head to "confirm his disgnosis".
ENT2 said to leave it in and that surgery is not necessary.
I have had it since at least 1986 as seen on a Panarex from
that year.  My dentist who discovered this on a new Panarex
said he has never seen anything like this ever and it comes
right out of a medical text book.

I am TOTALLY asymptomatic with the exception of many sinus
infections (2/year usually--sometimes 4/year).

Can these be removed by any other means than Caldwell-Luc
(like going through the nose?).  I really don't want to
lose teeth.

What causes these?  i.e. are you born with it?  I'm trying
to get earlier Panarex's to see...

Can they grow so large that even Caldwell-Luc is not
possible?



Mon, 07 Oct 1996 21:45:35 GMT
 Sinus Retention Cyst Question to ENT's

writes:

Quote:
>Can these be removed by any other means than Caldwell-Luc
>(like going through the nose?).  I really don't want to
>lose teeth.

    I would like to add to this question.  Why can't ENT surgeons make a
straight forward "frontal approach" to the maxilary sinus?  Isn't it
under the eye, and therefore accessible through the cheek?  (As you can
tell, I am NOT a physician and my understanding of anatomy might be
completely wrong).


Mon, 07 Oct 1996 23:33:56 GMT
 Sinus Retention Cyst Question to ENT's
I had a Caldwell-Luc for a maxillary sinus about 17 years ago.The
operation immediately ended my repeated sinus infections though I have had
perpetual allergic sinusitis ever since (apparently I'm allergic to every
known form of ponderable matter). The operation didn't cost me any
teeth-the surgeon went in between the teeth and the upper lip. It wasn't a
big deal-over night in the hospital and back at work, albeit with a
monster nose bandage and a black eye, in two or three days.

Good luck,

Jim Harrison



Wed, 09 Oct 1996 13:14:44 GMT
 Sinus Retention Cyst Question to ENT's

    I would like to add to this question.  Why can't ENT surgeons
make a
straight forward "frontal approach" to the maxilary sinus?  Isn't it
under the eye, and therefore accessible through the cheek?  (As you
can
tell, I am NOT a physician and my understanding of anatomy might be
completely wrong).

I am an ENT, and the answer is: you can go straight through the front
of the sinus. In fact this IS a "Caldwell-Luc" operation. Fortuately
nowdays there is a better way for managing most sinusitus by using
telescopes and operation excusively through the nose. This is known
as "Endoscopic Sinus Surgery" This approach can enlarge the openings
of most of the sinuses (thus curing them) without making any
incisions other than inside the nose. In fact it is a much more
effective and less traumatic approach than the older approaches and
is generally performed by all Up-to-Date ENTs rather than the old
methods.
The previous question about a mucous retention cyst raises the
question of whether the surgery is even needed. In most cases
retention cysts are asymptomatic and do not need to be treated at
all. You may wish to get a second opinion or an explanation from your
ENT.
Good luck!
Tim Frost, M.D. (ENT)



Sat, 30 Nov 1996 10:49:05 GMT
 Sinus Retention Cyst Question to ENT's

Quote:



>    I would like to add to this question.  Why can't ENT surgeons
>make a
>straight forward "frontal approach" to the maxilary sinus?  Isn't it
>under the eye, and therefore accessible through the cheek?  (As you
>can
>tell, I am NOT a physician and my understanding of anatomy might be
>completely wrong).

>I am an ENT, and the answer is: you can go straight through the front
>of the sinus. In fact this IS a "Caldwell-Luc" operation. Fortuately
>nowdays there is a better way for managing most sinusitus by using
>telescopes and operation excusively through the nose. This is known
>as "Endoscopic Sinus Surgery" This approach can enlarge the openings
>of most of the sinuses (thus curing them) without making any
>incisions other than inside the nose. In fact it is a much more
>effective and less traumatic approach than the older approaches and
>is generally performed by all Up-to-Date ENTs rather than the old
>methods.
>The previous question about a mucous retention cyst raises the
>question of whether the surgery is even needed. In most cases
>retention cysts are asymptomatic and do not need to be treated at
>all. You may wish to get a second opinion or an explanation from your

        I entirely agree with your view.  I am not sure where the business
        of a mucoous retention cysts came up.  Perhaps I missed the earlier
        mails but yes, if they are small and not the cause of other problems
        by all means leave them alone.

        I have not done a single C_L in the past four years for sinusitis,
        ever since I started doing FESS.  Elegant operation don't you
        agree?

        Palani



Mon, 02 Dec 1996 19:13:46 GMT
 
 [ 5 post ] 

 Relevant Pages 

1. Sinus Sx/ENT or Clinicians Commentaries Appreciated for Emergent Sinus Sx on 12-23-99

2. Mucus Retention Cyst

3. mucosal retention cyst

4. mucous retention cyst?

5. Cysts in the sinuses.

6. Final News About ovarian cysts. incidence of ovarian cysts over time,ovarian cysts surgery,treatment ovarian cysts,ovarian cysts accupuncture,ovarian cysts naturist treatment

7. ENT question re: turbinates

8. ENT question / Re: Flying and ear pain

9. ENT question - submucous resection of inferior turbinates

10. ENT help - Meniere's Disease

11. Question: Fat Retention


 
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software