Quote:
>How is it that placebos are legal? It would seem to me that if, as a patient,
>you purchase a drug you've been prescribed and it's just sugar (or whatever),
>there's a few legal complications that arise:
> 1.
>If you have been diagnosed with a condition and you aren't given accepted
>treatment for it, it seems like intentional medical malpractice.
A placebo is an accepted treatment at times.
Quote:
> 2.
>A placebo should fall, legally, under the label of quackery (why not?)
Why should it? Placebos are effective under certain circumstances. That's
why they're used.
Actually, I don't know know anyone who has actually gotten a "sugar pill".
I don't know how it could be done, since prescription {*filter*} are always
labeled, and it's easy enough to find out what's in a pill if you have the
name.
It's more common to prescribe a drug which is effective for something, just
not for what you have. Antibiotics for viral infections are the most
common such placebo.
Quote:
> 3.
>Getting what you pay for. (Deceptive "bait and switch" to an extreme...). False
>advertising (what if McDonalds didn't put 100% pure beef in their hamburgers?)
I'm not sure what you mean by this. What do you think you're paying for?
You're not entitled to a prescription drug just because you pay for a
doctor's appointment.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------