Quote:
>I saw a patient today who had a diagnosis of stage IV renal cell Ca
>diagnosed and treated at a local (nationally known) cancer hospital.
>He went to a place in Houston Tx run by a Dr. Burzynski and was treated
>with antineoplaston. Returned to Cancer Hospital and was told (after CT
>CT scans) that his cancer was gone. I did a search on Medline and found
>a number of articles on this. Makes me think this may not be all bunk.
>Antineoplaston is a polypeptide that is excreted in the urine of normal
>individuals. Supposedly has antineoplastic activity and little or no
>side effects.
>Anyone know anything about Burzynski or antineoplastons?
Dr Piazza:
I find this quite "interesting" since I have stage IV renal cell cancer.
I had not heard of a specific case of renal cell responding to this
before. Being in stable long term remission, a trip to Texas is not
necessarily in my future, however.
Anyway, Anti-neoplastons are an "alternative treatment"' for cancer, but
one which has far more credibility than most, IMHO. A recent visit by an
NCI team concluded that there had been responses in a number of cases of
brain tumor including glioblastoma multiforme, and clinical trials are now
in progress both at the Burzynski institute, and elsewhere. Sloan
Ketterning, I think. This not withstanding, Burzynski has been embroiled
in a long series of disputes with various regulatory authorities such as
the FDA and the Texas medical license board for many year.
You may also want to explore the relation between anti-neoplastons, and
phenylacetate which is being tested at NCI now.
You might want to look at my web page which is called "CancerGuide". The
URL is:
http://bcn.boulder.co.us/health/cancer/canguide.html
I have information on anti-neoplastons under "alternative therapies".
-Steve Dunn