L(> Well, some appropriate comments have already been made by someone
L(> signing with a DC, so there's not much more to say except that I guess
L(> I know of at least one chiropractor Ron Roth won't be sending any
L(> patients to.
You may have a point there. It *would* be pretty awkward to send
an instructions manual along with the patient...
L(> But I had a vision . . .
Most MDs do; it's outlined in IS.14:14: "I will ascend
above the clouds; I will be like the most High."
L(> | While other spinal segments can be aligned at times using minerals,
Well, I hate to see people running to a chiropractor two or
three times a week through half a lifetime in order to have the
same area adjusted over and over again, so I usually try to align
their vertebrae more permanently using the appropriate chemical
support.
While that technique works on most of the other areas of the
spine, I haven't found a match yet for T-3, so I have to rely
on a manual adjustment. Of course if it was someone in my own
family, I'd just use my foot and step on it...
L(> . . . of Ron Roth banging away on someone's spine with a chunk of
L(> chromium salt to realign a vertebra. Another chuckle for today.
L(>
L(> /J
You're reading to many *scientific* medical fables; that's not
quite how it's done.
The test that I run gives me a profile of a person's chemistry
and the alignment of all T, L and S vertebrae. Over many years
of correcting people's mineral patterns, I couldn't help noticing
that normalizing someone's chemistry also seemed to many times
correct their spinal alignment problems. Conferring with a number
of chiropractors and sending patients both ways after manual and
mineral adjustments, and comparing data and results has confirmed
that it is possible to do just that.
While there is no "Western" explanation for that phenomenon, the
rules and laws used with the acupuncture system not only confirm
the relationship, but also helped to provide the basis of putting
everything together into a workable system.
When Ruth Ginzberg outlined her daughter's medical condition and
all the many tests that she's already had, I offered merely the
*SUGGESTION* of trying T-3, since I have had several cases where
manipulating that vertebra corrected the exact same problem, and
it could have been a safe, simple and FREE endeavor to possibly
help her daughter's condition.
If it didn't correct the problem, so what; it was worth a try!
Also, there was *NO* suggestion implied that this particular
approach was to be the *preferred* choice of treatment.
(The above paragraph is more or less in response to that DC's
iteration of keeping *scientific* and *non-scientific* medicine
apart. While I would go along with that, I also believe that
if ANYTHING does really work, it's scientific enough for me to
offer it to anyone who wants to take advantage of it!
Some of his comments though made me wonder if he's related to the
three wise men of sci.med, or perhaps he wants to become one of
them - white curly wig and all --- Good Luck!)
In the usual clinical setting, I wouldn't have to *GUESS*, but
instead just run my test and with a fairly high probability tell
her of whether the cause was spinal, organic or chemical...
--Ron--
---
RoseReader 2.00 P003228: Some days you step on it...some days you don't...
RoseMail 2.10 : Usenet: Rose Media - Hamilton (416) 575-5363