Author |
Message |
Ed Ki #1 / 7
|
 HMO's
Are there any other disadvantages to using HMO's other than seeing your primary doctor 1st and paying the small office fee before going to a specialist that your primary recommends? Also, will all hospitals take you as a patient or only in the area that you live. For example, the next county over, I have relatives and if I would need medical attention or surgery would prefer to be in that county's hospital, is that possible? I have Blue Cross & Blue Shield, but this new job offers HMO and I could save the premium I pay now. Please don't sugar coat any good or bad information, I can take it, thanks to all who read this post and reply in advance. Ed ... "I drank what!?!" * Socrates ___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12
|
Tue, 14 Oct 1997 03:00:00 GMT |
|
 |
Donna Kinn #2 / 7
|
 HMO's
: Are there any other disadvantages to using HMO's other than seeing your : primary doctor 1st and paying the small office fee before going to a : specialist that your primary recommends? Also, will all hospitals take : you as a patient or only in the area that you live. For example, the : next county over, I have relatives and if I would need medical attention : or surgery would prefer to be in that county's hospital, is that : possible? I have Blue Cross & Blue Shield, but this new job offers HMO : and I could save the premium I pay now. Please don't sugar coat any good : or bad information, I can take it, thanks to all who read this post and : reply in advance. Ed HMO's control costs mainly by reducing utilization. They save the most money by reducing inpatient days. This may never be a problem for you, but they will strongly encourage early discharge from any hospital stay. This often works out fine if patients have good support systems at home, but patients are going home sicker than they have ever done before. The biggest problem for me has been with other utilization controls. There are several things that you should know about them: 1) The HMO probably pays your primary care physician a capitation rate. This means that your doctor makes the SAME amount of money, regardless of the services that he provides for you. So if you never see him, he makes a good profit, but if you are sick, he may lose money on your care. This creates a disincentive to treat sick people. 2) HMOs often create barriers of some kind to prevent you from getting services such as diagnostic testing or visits with specialists. In my HMO, I can't get lab testing in my physician's office, but have to go across town to a specific reference lab. And I still can't get referrals to the only allergist in town who has ever treated my daughter's asthma properly. In that case, I simply pay for his visits out-of-pocket, but if she ever ended up hospitalized under his care, the HMO would not cover it. 3) If a primary care physician "bucks the system" and orders diagnostic testing and gives referrals to specialists, he becomes a "high-cost provider" and may be dropped from the plan. I wouldn't let the health care coverage determine whether I accepted a job offer or not, but I think that you should know these things in advance. In fact all patients should be informed of them, up front. This is not the current practice. -- Donna Kinney | My views are mine, alone. It's unlikely
|
Fri, 17 Oct 1997 03:00:00 GMT |
|
 |
Laurence A. Moo #3 / 7
|
 HMO's
Quote: > Are there any other disadvantages to using HMO's other than > seeing your primary doctor 1st and paying the small office fee > before going to a specialist that your primary recommends?
I just shifted from a worthless Blue Cross Prudent Buyer plan to the Blue Cross HMO. Of the few feet I've read of the miles of fine print they sent, only one section bothers me: it says that if I need to dial 911, I shouldn't. I should find and call the number of my regional Blue Cross HMO, explain the problem to them, and if they decide that 911 should be dialed, they'll do it. If I'm holding my head in my hand, I suspect that I'll throw caution to the wind and do it myself. More generally, I've heard that the worst thing about HMOs is that they treat you like cattle. - Larry
|
Fri, 17 Oct 1997 03:00:00 GMT |
|
 |
Chica #4 / 7
|
 HMO's
Quote: Terris) writes:
>writes: >>> Are there any other disadvantages to using HMO's other than >>> seeing your primary doctor 1st and paying the small office fee >>> before going to a specialist that your primary recommends? >>I just shifted from a worthless Blue Cross Prudent Buyer plan to >>the Blue Cross HMO. >>Of the few feet I've read of the miles of fine print they sent, >>only one section bothers me: it says that if I need to dial 911, >>I shouldn't. I should find and call the number of my regional >>Blue Cross HMO, explain the problem to them, and if they decide >>that 911 should be dialed, they'll do it. If I'm holding my head >>in my hand, I suspect that I'll throw caution to the wind and do >>it myself. >>More generally, I've heard that the worst thing about HMOs is >>that they treat you like cattle. >>- Larry >Hi, >I've heard horror stories about HMOs. Happily, the one I belong to is >great. Recently, (last month) I had to have surgery on my spine >(ruptured disk fragment compressing my spinal cord). So far, I've paid >$30 ($10 to internist who noticed an abnormal reflex, $10 to the >neurologist he referred me to and $10 to the neurosurgeon who performed >the surgery). I added up all the bills for the surgery (MRI, hospital >stay, radiologists, surgeon, etc.) and it comes to about $13,000. >When I was in the hospital (private room), the neurosurgeon actually >asked me when I wanted to go home. He said it was up to me...if I felt >I needed more time in the hospital, then I should stay. I left after >two days so I could get some rest. They take your vitals every two >hours. It was hard to get uninterrupted rest. I walzed out of the >hospital without paying a dime. >I've noticed that my internist doesn't hesitate to order tests or >referrals if he feels it's necessary. I don't know if the HMO is >giving him grief but they pay the bills. I'm not a 'healthy' patient. >I have high {*filter*} pressure, a bad back and suffer from depression which >requires meds. >Anyway, these are my experiences with an HMO. >Pat
These physicans who are not "cost effective" will be weeded out of your HMO. I have sat in on meetings where just such a thing was done. They have no choice. They have a fixed sum of money, so money has to be the bottom line.
|
Sat, 18 Oct 1997 03:00:00 GMT |
|
 |
Patricia Terr #5 / 7
|
 HMO's
writes: Quote: >> Are there any other disadvantages to using HMO's other than >> seeing your primary doctor 1st and paying the small office fee >> before going to a specialist that your primary recommends? >I just shifted from a worthless Blue Cross Prudent Buyer plan to >the Blue Cross HMO. >Of the few feet I've read of the miles of fine print they sent, >only one section bothers me: it says that if I need to dial 911, >I shouldn't. I should find and call the number of my regional >Blue Cross HMO, explain the problem to them, and if they decide >that 911 should be dialed, they'll do it. If I'm holding my head >in my hand, I suspect that I'll throw caution to the wind and do >it myself. >More generally, I've heard that the worst thing about HMOs is >that they treat you like cattle. >- Larry
Hi, I've heard horror stories about HMOs. Happily, the one I belong to is great. Recently, (last month) I had to have surgery on my spine (ruptured disk fragment compressing my spinal cord). So far, I've paid $30 ($10 to internist who noticed an abnormal reflex, $10 to the neurologist he referred me to and $10 to the neurosurgeon who performed the surgery). I added up all the bills for the surgery (MRI, hospital stay, radiologists, surgeon, etc.) and it comes to about $13,000. When I was in the hospital (private room), the neurosurgeon actually asked me when I wanted to go home. He said it was up to me...if I felt I needed more time in the hospital, then I should stay. I left after two days so I could get some rest. They take your vitals every two hours. It was hard to get uninterrupted rest. I walzed out of the hospital without paying a dime. I've noticed that my internist doesn't hesitate to order tests or referrals if he feels it's necessary. I don't know if the HMO is giving him grief but they pay the bills. I'm not a 'healthy' patient. I have high {*filter*} pressure, a bad back and suffer from depression which requires meds. Anyway, these are my experiences with an HMO. Pat
|
Sat, 18 Oct 1997 03:00:00 GMT |
|
 |
The Snyder-Dun #6 / 7
|
 HMO's
Quote:
>Are there any other disadvantages to using HMO's other than seeing your >primary doctor 1st and paying the small office fee before going to a >specialist that your primary recommends? Also, will all hospitals take >you as a patient or only in the area that you live. For example, the >next county over,
HMOs make every effort to limit the patient to doctors and facilities that are part of the network. By signing up for an HMO, you lose the ability to choose the doctor and facility of your choice. HMOs accept a flat fee, and do all of your medical care in exchange. They have a natural incentive to cut costs and corners at your expense. When I was diagnosed with advanced cancer more than five years ago, I traveled across the country to get expensive (and succesful) treatments that my fee for service insurance paid for. It is highly unlikely that an HMO would've paid. So sometimes freedom of choice is a life or death matter. -Steve Dunn
|
Sat, 18 Oct 1997 03:00:00 GMT |
|
 |
xFull Na #7 / 7
|
 HMO's
Quote:
>HMOs make every effort to limit the patient to doctors and facilities >that are part of the network. By signing up for an HMO, you lose the >ability to choose the doctor and facility of your choice. HMOs accept a >flat fee, and do all of your medical care in exchange. They have a >natural incentive to cut costs and corners at your expense. >When I was diagnosed with advanced cancer more than five years ago, I >traveled across the country to get expensive (and succesful) treatments >that my fee for service insurance paid for. It is highly unlikely that an >HMO would've paid. So sometimes freedom of choice is a life or death >matter.
A positive note about HMO's: My father recently had a heart transplant. We just received a copy of the bill - $366,000. The HMO he belongs to covered it without any difficulties. They also covered the quad bypass he had five years ago and the intervening health care (very significant!). Their primary care physician is very good about referrals to the specialists my parents use. For chronically ill patients who's specialists accept the HMO, I believe there is no more cost-effective way to go. Traditional health care plans can limit the lifetime coverage amounts - I have known people this has happened to. Not a good thing for a chronically ill person! My husband and I also use an HMO (different one). Well baby care, my pregnancy, etc were all covered with a minimum of fuss. Good luck! --E.Katz
|
Sat, 18 Oct 1997 03:00:00 GMT |
|
|
|