Author |
Message |
NozomiM.. #1 / 25
|
 Purified water versus tap water
Are there any health benefits in drinking purified water as compared to tap water or is it mainly an issue of taste? I live in a large US city, and the tap water tastes horrid, but I don't think that it can actually affect my health (although I have been told so). Have there been any studies done on this?
|
Sat, 05 Jan 2008 02:52:05 GMT |
|
 |
Bob #2 / 25
|
 Purified water versus tap water
Quote: >Are there any health benefits in drinking purified water as compared to >tap water or is it mainly an issue of taste? I live in a large US city, >and the tap water tastes horrid, but I don't think that it can actually >affect my health (although I have been told so). Have there been any >studies done on this?
Your water company should be sending you a report each year about what is in the water. Get one, and look at it. There is no simple relationship between taste and healthfulness. You need to look at what is in the water. The water presumably meets legal specs, so is officially considered ok for health. Of course, there is always room to quibble about some of the specs. Bottom line... there is probably no big problem with it. But any better statement requires looking at the analysis -- looking at specifics. bob
|
Sat, 05 Jan 2008 08:53:05 GMT |
|
 |
Jim Chinni #3 / 25
|
 Purified water versus tap water
Quote: >Are there any health benefits in drinking purified water as compared to >tap water or is it mainly an issue of taste? I live in a large US city, >and the tap water tastes horrid, but I don't think that it can actually >affect my health (although I have been told so). Have there been any >studies done on this?
Tap water IS purified water. -- Jim Chinnis Warrenton, {*filter*}ia, USA
|
Sat, 05 Jan 2008 09:20:30 GMT |
|
 |
dcholi.. #4 / 25
|
 Purified water versus tap water
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Not so. Tap water is full of minerals and trace chemicals. What you lose in purified water is the fluoride which slows or prevents dental cavities. To compensate, brush with a medically recommended fluoride compound. One more thing. Don't rinse your mouth after brushing. You can spit but not rinse. This allows extra fluoride ions to penetrate the enamel. Ask your dentist for a sample. The standard tube costs $12. David H ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
Sun, 06 Jan 2008 03:24:01 GMT |
|
 |
Jim Chinni #5 / 25
|
 Purified water versus tap water
Quote: >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >Not so. Tap water is full of minerals and trace >chemicals. What you lose in purified water is >the fluoride which slows or prevents dental >cavities. To compensate, brush with a medically >recommended fluoride compound. One more >thing. Don't rinse your mouth after brushing. >You can spit but not rinse. This allows extra fluoride >ions to penetrate the enamel. Ask your dentist for a >sample. The standard tube costs $12. >David H >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"purified," not "pure." -- Jim Chinnis Warrenton, {*filter*}ia, USA
|
Sun, 06 Jan 2008 03:37:22 GMT |
|
 |
Carey Gregor #6 / 25
|
 Purified water versus tap water
Quote:
>Not so. Tap water is full of minerals and trace >chemicals.
Some of which are beneficial. And what makes you think bottled water doesn't have those same minerals and trace chemicals? Unless it's distilled water, bottled in glass and sealed imperviously, what makes it any better? Nature is funny that way. Pure water simply doesn't exist in nature, and I'm pretty skeptical that anything bottled in plastic is "pure" for very long anyway. In fact, I'm not even sure what "purified water" actually is, but if we're talking about commercial bottled water sold under various marketing names that evoke images of crystal clear springs, those products often have much higher bacteria counts than the average municipal water supply. The only thing pure about them is the picture of crystal clear springs on the label and the profits they generate. Bottled water is the biggest scam of the century. It never ceases to amaze me that people will pay well over $1 for a half liter of water of unknown quality if it's put in a bottle with a fancy label.
|
Sun, 06 Jan 2008 10:14:08 GMT |
|
 |
David Wrig #7 / 25
|
 Purified water versus tap water
Quote:
>Are there any health benefits in drinking purified water as compared to >tap water or is it mainly an issue of taste? I live in a large US city, >and the tap water tastes horrid, but I don't think that it can actually >affect my health (although I have been told so). Have there been any >studies done on this?
The chlorine in tap water is probably responsible for some small number of cases of bladder cancer every year, though I'm not sure how well established this is. (The cost of not disinfecting the water is higher, of course.) So a filter that removes chlorine might be worth having if you consume tap water. Your local water almost certainly isn't harmful, but if you don't like the taste of it, get a filter. -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "I believe The Battle of the Network Stars should be fought with guns." -- Steve Martin
|
Sun, 06 Jan 2008 10:51:10 GMT |
|
 |
Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.co #8 / 25
|
 Purified water versus tap water
Quote:
> Bottled water is the biggest scam of the century. It never ceases to amaze > me that people will pay well over $1 for a half liter of water of unknown > quality if it's put in a bottle with a fancy label.
COMMENT: It's a dollar's worth of decreased anxiety, baby. Works just as well as a dollar's worth of anxiety-decreasing homeopathic crap, and fixes your thirst, too. Hey, better than a poke in the eye with a sharp stick. SBH
|
Sun, 06 Jan 2008 11:47:19 GMT |
|
 |
Leigh Darnal #9 / 25
|
 Purified water versus tap water
Quote:
> Bottled water is the biggest scam of the century. It never ceases to amaze > me that people will pay well over $1 for a half liter of water of unknown > quality if it's put in a bottle with a fancy label.
Nah. I buy bottled water because it's convenient, it's healthier than Coke and tastes better than the local municipal water. The labels don't fool me. My favorite brand is from the Houston city supply and merely run through charcoal filters. Yumm. L Darnall
|
Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:35:44 GMT |
|
 |
rastapast #10 / 25
|
 Purified water versus tap water
Quote: > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Not so. Tap water is full of minerals and trace > chemicals. What you lose in purified water is > the fluoride which slows or prevents dental > cavities. To compensate, brush with a medically > recommended fluoride compound. One more > thing. Don't rinse your mouth after brushing. > You can spit but not rinse. This allows extra fluoride > ions to penetrate the enamel. Ask your dentist for a > sample. The standard tube costs $12. > David H > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yes---I have been getting this for a few years now. I quit using it a year ago or so in order to save a few bucks a year due to my loss of work and return to school. My dentist Rx'd it for sensitivity, and it works, but you have to be consistent (which isn't a big deal for me, I just decided to stop buying it for the moment due to financial reasons), and I found BID TX is fine. Once in the morning & at bedtime after brushing. David's right---you just brush it on for a few minutes (recommended, but a minute is fine). AFA the tap H2O question, well, the Culligan water we use at home (& my dad's office) is filtered by reverse osmosis & some other filtration techniques, & I believe it's much different then the tap water here in town. The Culligan (or most any other reverse osmosis/filtered water, or even spring water) makes all the difference for me. Tastes great. Some add minerals for taste, which is fine I guess, but I like that Culligan water. (I know, the check's in the mail for spamming for Culligan, right?).
|
Tue, 08 Jan 2008 03:52:59 GMT |
|
 |
John Schutkeke #11 / 25
|
 Purified water versus tap water
Quote: > What you lose in purified water is > the fluoride which slows or prevents dental > cavities.
"Purifiers" are charcoal filters, not stills. The water isn't de- chlorinated, so it won't be de-fluoridated, either.
|
Tue, 08 Jan 2008 07:49:22 GMT |
|
 |
John Schutkeke #12 / 25
|
 Purified water versus tap water
Quote: > In fact, I'm not even sure what "purified water" actually is,
It's been through a charcoal filter.
|
Tue, 08 Jan 2008 07:50:44 GMT |
|
 |
Carey Gregor #13 / 25
|
 Purified water versus tap water
Quote:
>My favorite brand is from the Houston city supply and merely >run through charcoal filters. Yumm.
So Houston has one redeeming quality, after all. ;-)
|
Tue, 08 Jan 2008 08:12:07 GMT |
|
 |
Steven Bornfel #14 / 25
|
 Purified water versus tap water
Quote:
>>What you lose in purified water is >>the fluoride which slows or prevents dental >>cavities. > "Purifiers" are charcoal filters, not stills. The water isn't de- > chlorinated, so it won't be de-fluoridated, either.
I'll have to check. Many of the filters contain colloidal silver--I believe they may be designed to remove chlorine. Steve -- Cut the nonsense to reply
|
Tue, 08 Jan 2008 10:54:59 GMT |
|
|