-*----
Someone said:
Quote:
>> .... Speaking as someone who was over 150 pounds
>> overweight for nearly 20 years, I think obesity is a trivial
>> problem compared to AIDS, cancer, and aging, which are where
>> research dollars should be going.
Quote:
> I disagree with you on the funding of medical research for obesity.
> Millions of Americans grapple with this disease each day of their
> lives, only to be told to get rid of it by exercising "will-power".
> ... Obesity leads to many of the diseases that we are currently
> spending limited medical funding on, namely heart disease,
> diabetes and arthritis.
Physicians and other medical practitioners have harped so much on
linkages such as that between obesity and heart disease that some
people tend to view them as pure cause and effect. This is a
mistake. Some fat people will develop very little
artherosclerosis and some skinny people who exercise daily and who
eat a low fat diet and who follow all the other recommendations
will nonetheless die from coronary artery disease at a young age.
Rather than viewing artherosclerosis and coronary artery disease
as an end result of obesity, I think it is more accurate to view
it as a genetic disease that develops as people age and whose
development is *partly* modifiable by exercise and diet.
Of course, one cannot change one's genes (yet), so allegedly
controllable factors such as smoking, diet, and exercise loom
large in physicians' recommendations. It may be that we can find
a cure for coronary artery disease. But we cannot find a cure
for coronary artery disease *merely* by curing obesity. The same
is true for other diseases, such as diabetes, for which obesity
is an aggravating factor.
Russell