Handling Psychosis And Compulsions
 - A Definition Of Psychosis - Definition Of Compulsion

                                                   15 September 2002

You see, we are only interested in definitions that help people,
 that work, that you can do something with, and that's why these
 definitions are rather more correct.

[defining psychosis]
So a person suffering from a psychosis we have now defined, as
 someone who follows too many compulsions (lies) thrown (Footnote
 (1)) at him (or at her) that make him think and act very
 irrationally - he acts very irrationally because he does not
 classify these (projected(1) lies) as illusions(2) which another
 wants him to accept as delusions(2) and which the source of it
 intends him to accept and justify: He should make the delusions
 given to him, seem so, to himself and others, AS IF these are his
 own thoughts and feelings and goals, and which the source indeed
 intends him to act upon AS IF these are his own thoughts and his
 own intentions and his own feelings and his own decisions.
 The resulting behavior is highly irrational, meaning contrary to
 his own and natural goals and interests. We are not talking about
 a criminal mind here, but about a victim of criminal minds.

[restoring denied respect for what someone really is]
The state is usually temporary and often conditional to certain
 circumstances, or to being with certain people who may be connected
 to, or who may themselves be, individuals that want to destroy
 him: Refusing to respect what and who he (as a spirit) is;
 forcefully denying who and what kind of person or soul he or she
 is; forcefully denying good and trustworthy friends; enforcing very
 destructive individuals, or themselves, to be his "real and caring
 friends."(3)

[discovering the force of the illusion]
Finding out who throws(1) (or threw) or enforces the delusion (the
 lies) - or finding more than one person throwing it and enforcing
 it, finding out WHO? - turns the delusion back into an illusion
 (into now recognized lies) which then can of course more easily be
 rejected: "It's just an illusion projected at me by another - an
 illusion to make me think and feel it is me who generates it - but
 it does not belong to me!"

He assigns it back to where it came from, and so he gets in control
 of it. But he could not control it as long as he thought (and was
 told, too) that it was "his own."

[definition of compulsion]
A compulsion is then indeed defined as an action that is determined
 by another onto the victim, and caused by another by means of
 enforcement of illusions (lies) that are (or have in his past been)
 accepted by or enforced onto the victim who suffers from the
 compulsion, enforced as delusions (as undetected lies).
 This is how the victim has no ability to get rid of the compulsion,
 and only has the ability to not give in to it when he feels it. And
 that indeed defines the word 'compulsion' by its behavior.

 But if he finds out who forced (in his past) or forces (now still
 or again) the compulsion and delusion onto him, and if he finds out
 how the enforcement is done, then he will get actually rid of it.

[handling compulsions]
This knowledge will probably solve many compulsions of any nature and
 on any subject, that a person wants to get rid of. And on the way,
 he might want to get rid of more compulsions too.

[harmful compulsions]
 Ultimately, intentions to take {*filter*} are compulsions to not face
 Hate or Ugliness or Disorder,(4) and can be approached then in this
 way too.

[compulsions to commit suicide]
It also solves compulsions to commit suicide that are caused by
 delusions projected and enforced by individuals who want the victim
 dead and who want him, by projecting the delusion at him, to
 justify, to believe and to feel that suicide is "the way to go."

[compelled not to face the thrower of the delusion]
Many victims will not want to look at who throws the delusions at
 them. That's part of the delusion, to make the person who throws it
 not looked at, not detected, lest the delusion would lose its
 influence. So it's part of any delusion.

 It's all so simple to figure out once you know the basics.

 Part of the delusion is always to hide the source, and to make the
 victim not want to or "not have to" look for it, and to make him
 comply with the force exerted by the delusion, so that he will
 supply an endless variety of very intelligent and socially very
 accepted "reasons" of "how it is his own intentions and his own
 decisions," INSTEAD OF looking for the source. He keeps you asking
 endlessly and he always has the "right" but not the correct answers.

[keeping on to and relaying delusions]
And some people will want the delusions more than anything else.
 They want to stay dominated, controlled, cowered, and 'eat' (feel
 alive) whenever someone throws them, or they can steal, a morsel of
 bread (some Aliveness). Your efforts are used by them to be able to
 better hide and keep onto the delusions they want to keep. And they
 WANT to keep destructive, hateful people as friends, because these
 provide the delusions for them whenever they want to have them.
 They also enforce delusions on others, like drug {*filter*}s that try
 to get others on {*filter*} too.

[facing the real world]
You will have to face, look at, feel or see the individuals who do
 these kind of things to people, and you will have to not Hate(5)
 these individuals when you find out about them, so that they - their
 request and demand that you Hate(5) -  will not cloud your vision
 and your Love for people and your composure.

[grateful people]
So if you want to save lives or want to have people be very grateful
 to you - be my guest.

Koos Nolst Trenit "Cause Trinity"
human rights philosopher and poet

(1) Footnote:
"Mechanics Of Awareness, Perception, Memory And Forgetfulness"
  of 13 September 2002

(2) Footnote:
A very precise description of how they project 'Delusions' and of
 what a 'Delusion' is, is given in

'Mozart Remedying Spiritual {*filter*} - Fine Particle Physics
     - Beauty and Awareness' (20 August 2002)

(3) Footnote:
 The Nature of War and Friendship (24 Sept 1998)

(4) Footnote:
 'Defining Love and Hate - a Law of Life (Definition)' of 29 July 2002
http://www.***.com/ %40p...

(5) Footnote
 - A Poem of Love and Adventure (17 July 2002)
http://www.***.com/ %40p...

Copyright 2002 by Koos Nolst Trenit - human rights philosopher
 and poet
This is 'learnware' - it may not be altered, and it is free for
 anyone who learns from it, and (or, if he can't learn from it)
 who passes it on unaltered, and with this message included, to
 others who might be able to learn from it.
None of my writings may be used, ever, to support any political
 or religious agenda, but only to educate and encourage people to
 judge undominated and for themselves about any organizations or
 individuals.
Send free-of-Envy and free-of-Hate, Beautiful e-mails to:
 PlatoWorld at Lycos.com
  (address unreadable for internet robots