In article
Quote:
> > > > > Mitchell
> > > > > > >> >>> They take over the mail distribution system (eg US Postal
> > > > > > >> >>> Service).
> > > > > > >> >> Who did the government "take over" mail distribution
> > > > > > >> >> from?
> > > > > > >> > Name the company right here: Wells Fargo. I don't remember
> > > > > > >> > if
> > > > > > >> > the Pony
> > > > > > >> > Express was a gov't owned organization. Wells Fargo was a
> > > > > > >> > private
> > > > > > >> > company and still owns lots of banks.
> > > > > > >> The US Post Office is in the Constitution. It predates the Pony
> > > > > > >> Express (which only lasted a year or two) and Wells Fargo by
> > > > > > >> something like a century.
> > > > > > >> IIRC, Wells Fargo and other companies didn't run an
> independent mail
> > > > > > >> service--they carried US Post Office mail as contractors with
> > > > > > >> the
> > > > > > >> government. IOW, the Post Office, as they do today, worked with
> > > > > > >> private companies to help distribute the mail. Not a
> > > > > > >> particularly
> > > > > > >> socialist thing to do.
> > > > > > > The US postal service is laying off huge numbers of people.
> > > > > > So is Wells Fargo.
> > > > > > Wells Fargo to lay off 3,800
> > > > > > Wells Fargo & Co. said Wednesday that it's closing
> > > > > > its 638 Wells Fargo Financial stores and ending the
> > > > > > origination of non-prime mortgage loans that it keeps
> > > > > > in its portfolio.
> > > > > > http://tinyurl.com/7pzjzhx
> > > > > > So what is your point?
> > > > > That the US Postal Service is a socialist organization and that Wells
> > > > The US Postal Service is mandated by the Constitution - ergo, the
> Constitution
> > > > must be socialist.
> > > > > Fargo is NOT a socialist organization since it's not controlled by
> > > > > the
> > > > > Federal govt'.
> > > Large Federal Agencies are basically socialists.
> > Even the post office? The military? The FDA? What federal agency isn't
> > socialist, in your opinion ->
> If there is a federal agency that only has a hundred employees or
> less--they would not be socialist.
It is too bad that, unlike talk.origins, this newsgroup doesn't have a
"Chez Watt". If it did, Jason would win the "prize" repeatedly. However,
this is one of his better Chez Watts.
No, Jason, that is not a compliment.