Now Lee/etc insists that humans marched
out of Africa 60 thousand years ago,
arriving in Israel 30 thousand years
before they left, and in china 40 to 80
thousand years before stepping out of Africa,
and these humans were fully modern and
looked just like "us," even though we don't
look like each other at all.

But, Lee/etc doesn't see a problem here.

Nope.

These were "anatomically modern" humans,
looking exactly like Europeans... and Asians...
and Africans... all at the same time... and they
marched out of Africa 60 thousand years
ago... but hadn't left yet 30 thousand years
ago... and the arrived in China at least 40
thousand years before they left...

But the point is that they replaced the older
population, even though he continuous proved
this isn't true with cites of interbreeding, and
that proves out of Africa/Replacement.

There's a reason why Lee/etc is a troll on
usenet and not an anthropologist/archaeologist
or anything else for that matter....

You may worship me.

But not like Neandertals. Thanks for pointing that out.

Wrong. Going by anatomy alone, before the DNA
proved him right, Erik Trinkaus observed:

: The earliest modern humans outside of the core
: area of eastern Africa can be understood only if
: a variable degree of admixture with regional
: groups of late archaic humans occurred.

 And later in 2007:

: A consideration of the morphological aspects
: of the earliest modern humans in Europe (more
: than 33,000 B.P.) and the subsequent
: Gravettian human remains indicates that they
: possess an anatomical pattern congruent with
:  the autapomorphic (derived) morphology of
: the earliest (Middle Paleolithic) African modern
: humans. However, they exhibit a variable suite
: of features that are either distinctive Neandertal
: traits and/or plesiomorphic (ancestral) aspects
: that had been lost among the African Middle
: Paleolithic modern humans.
http://www.pnas.org/content/104/18/7367.full

I don't have a link for the first one, but I do have
the PDF. I'll gladly e-mail it to any of your
personalities.

What these two cites demonstrate is that the
the so-called "moderns" who left Africa
acquired traits which their African counterparts
lost, and those traits are found in Neanderthals.

Put another way:  The fossil evidence showed
interbreeding long before the DNA evidence
proved it.

Thank you for your nonprofessional, data free, reference free, non-
scientific opinion.

Sept 23, 10:20 pm
JTEM: "We weren't
us until our ancestors did the {*filter*} with Neanderthals,
according to all the data."

It doesn't get any worse than that. Your evasive comments, thread
switching, snipping,
trying helplessly to distract from your illiteracy isn't an argument
and never will be.

William Banks, et al.
Neanderthal Extinction by Competitive Exclusion
PLOS ONE December 2008  Volume 3  Issue 12

Abstract
Background: Despite a long history of investigation, considerable
debate revolves
around whether Neanderthals became extinct because of climate change
or
competition with anatomically modern humans (AMH).

Now, see, Google Groups archives these groups,
and anyone who cares will look and see that
I was not only quoting Erik Trinkaus, but did post
the URL to the second study...

No, I don't have a URL for the 2005 study, but I
do have the PDF which I offered to e-mail to
the personality of your choice.

You're simply a moron, a bat shit crazy moron,
who invents conversations in his head instead
of responding to the one in front of him....