Considered Debate or Flippant Debate?
Quote:
> > >High testosterone, high melatonin, and
> > >high DHEA will produce an individual who exhibited a very large brain,
> > >along with large teeth and large brows.
> > Jeez, is this a theory of evolution or an adverti{*filter*}t for GNC?
> --James Howard responds:
> Why don't you respond to the theory, rather than just being a cute guy?
> I do not sell any product or service, nor am I assoicated in any manner
> or form with any entity (perons, company, corporation, etc.) that does.
> Is this the best you can do for a response; just be a cute guy?
Bob LaMark reponds to James Howard's responce of David Barnett's
response to James Howard
(are we 3rd-person schitzoids yet?!?):
The Bob LaMark Theory suggests that James Howard (of the well-known
"Howard Theory of
Human Evolution") is a bit too pumped-up on his own testosterone, and,
due to massive
testosterone overdose, is now resorting to hitting on fellow usenet
respondents.
If you need a date, professor Howard, just mainline some more of that
testosterone
and buy a Playboy! And don't call David Barnett "cute" until you have
bought him
a fancy supper and took him dancing first!
