The Lee/Rich/Jack/etc admits to being a goddamn fool
Quote:
> > > > Oops, there's another problem: ?The body has been in
> > > > Egypt for thousands of years, and unwrapped for more
> > > > than a century. It's a virtual impossibility that it hasn't
> > > > been contaminated by Egyptian pollen.
> > > He's been dead for 1734 odd years.
> > > How do you get 'thousands' ?
> For the record: ?Alexander the Great died in 323 BC. This
> "George" here is obviously confusing Alexander the Great
> for another historical figure....
The difference, idiot, is George was BIG enough to admit his mistake,
something you are to big an {*filter*} to do.
Quote:
> > Same way he got 6700 out of 10000 :-)
> Exactly the same way. Yup. I am just as mistaken now
> (i.e. "None") as I was then.
No {*filter*}, you simply can't admit you made an error, you are too much
a coward for that:
"This cite places the absolute oldest human remains
at around 6,700 years of age:
http://www.***.com/
The citation clearly says "beneath" the ash, and this dishonest
troll,
JTEM, types in "around" instead of "beneath, changing the original
meaning
by thousands of years. By paraphrasing, instead of making a direct
quote, this lying moron can make any claim to fit the needs of his
dishonest argument.
Read correctly by someone with a brain:
Page 11 (Hicks et al. 2004):
"Subsequent radiocarbon dating placed the age of these remains
at about 10,000 B.P. (Fryxell et al. 1968a,b: Gustafson and Gibson
1984:4: Sheppard et al. 1987)."
Yes, your own citation says 10,000, not "around" 6,700.
You are one dishonest son-of-a-{*filter*}.
Quote:
> Thanks for FINALLY admitting it.
So, do you finally admit you don't know 6700 from 10000?
