Lee/etc proves he is stupid 
Author Message
 Lee/etc proves he is stupid

Quote:
>  A 195,000 year old fossil from the Omo 1
> site in Ethiopia shows the beginnings of the skull changes that we
> associate with modern people, including a rounded skull case and
> possibly a projecting chin."

They're saying that it's not modern. The words they use are
"Beginning to show," not "demonstrate conclusively."

It's also impossible to tell a modern human just from the skull.
If you had any idea WHAT a modern human is, if it wasn't just
another term you throw around without a clue -- similar to
"Lip Service," or "Bolide Forcing" or even "Molecular Clock --
you would know this.

You're a moron and you constantly prove it.



Tue, 03 Jun 2014 20:22:27 GMT
 Lee/etc proves he is stupid


Fri, 19 Jun 1992 00:00:00 GMT
 Lee/etc proves he is stupid
Check this out:

reference

http://anthro.palomar.edu/homo2/mod_homo_4.htm
  "This is consistent with the hypothesis that humans expanded again
and again out of Africa"

 Amos is right:

W. Amos and J. I. Hoffman
Evidence that two main bottleneck events
shaped modern human genetic diversity
Proc. R. Soc. B (2010) 277, 131137

Abstract

There is a strong consensus that modern humans originated in Africa
and moved out to colonize the
world approximately 50 000 years ago. During the process of expansion,
variability was lost, creating a
linear gradient of decreasing diversity with increasing distance from
Africa. However, the exact way in
which this loss occurred remains somewhat unclear: did it involve one,
a few or a continuous series of
population bottlenecks? We addressed this by analysing a large
published dataset of 783 microsatellite
loci genotyped in 53 worldwide populations, using the program
BOTTLENECK. Immediately following
a sharp population decline, rare alleles are lost faster than
heterozygosity, creating a transient excess of
heterozygosity relative to allele number, a feature that is used by
BOTTLENECK to infer historical events.
We ?nd evidence of two primary events, one out of Africa and one
placed around the Bering Strait,
where an ancient land bridge allowed passage into the Americas. These
?ndings agree well with the
regions of the world where the largest founder events might have been
expected, but contrast with the
apparently smooth gradient of variability that is revealed when
current heterozygosity is plotted against
distance from Africa.

"It is now clear that early Homo sapiens, or modern humans, did not
come after the
 Neandertals but were their contemporaries.  However, it is likely
that both modern humans
 and Neandertals descended from Homo heidelbergensis."

Certainly corroborates this one:

http://tinyurl.com/83vs4tp

"The discovery of H. floresiensis discredits the multiregional theory
in a substantial way,
as this new species
with several distinctive features that could not have evolved into
modern H. sapiens.



Tue, 03 Jun 2014 20:50:41 GMT
 Lee/etc proves he is stupid


Fri, 19 Jun 1992 00:00:00 GMT
 Lee/etc proves he is stupid

Quote:
>  A 195,000 year old fossil from the Omo 1
> site in Ethiopia shows the beginnings of the skull changes that we
> associate with modern people, including a rounded skull case and
> possibly a projecting chin."

They're saying that it's not modern. The words they use are
"Beginning to show," not "demonstrate conclusively."

It's also impossible to tell a modern human just from the skull.
If you had any idea WHAT a modern human is, if it wasn't just
another term you throw around without a clue -- similar to
"Lip Service," or "Bolide Forcing" or even "Molecular Clock --
you would know this.

You're a moron and you constantly prove it.



Wed, 04 Jun 2014 00:49:50 GMT
 Lee/etc proves he is stupid


Fri, 19 Jun 1992 00:00:00 GMT
 Lee/etc proves he is stupid


reference

http://anthro.palomar.edu/homo2/mod_homo_4.htm
  "This is consistent with the hypothesis that humans expanded again
and again out of Africa"

 "It is now clear that early Homo sapiens, or modern humans, did not
come after the
 Neandertals but were their contemporaries.  However, it is likely
that both modern humans
 and Neandertals descended from Homo heidelbergensis."

"There is no reliable evidence of modern humans elsewhere in the Old
World until
 60,000-40,000 years ago, during a short temperate period in the midst
of the
last ice age."

Certainly corroborates this one:

http://tinyurl.com/83vs4tp

"The discovery of H. floresiensis discredits the multiregional theory
in a substantial way,
as this new species
with several distinctive features that could not have evolved into
modern H. sapiens.



Wed, 04 Jun 2014 01:58:38 GMT
 Lee/etc proves he is stupid


Fri, 19 Jun 1992 00:00:00 GMT
 Lee/etc proves he is stupid

Quote:
>  A 195,000 year old fossil from the Omo 1
> site in Ethiopia shows the beginnings of the skull changes that we
> associate with modern people, including a rounded skull case and
> possibly a projecting chin."

They're saying that it's not modern. The words they use are
"Beginning to show," not "demonstrate conclusively."

It's also impossible to tell a modern human just from the skull.
If you had any idea WHAT a modern human is, if it wasn't just
another term you throw around without a clue -- similar to
"Lip Service," or "Bolide Forcing" or even "Molecular Clock --
you would know this.

You're a moron and you constantly prove it.



Wed, 04 Jun 2014 04:51:51 GMT
 Lee/etc proves he is stupid


Fri, 19 Jun 1992 00:00:00 GMT
 Lee/etc proves he is stupid

<More reference free lip service from a nonprofessional>

Ottoni et al.
Mitochondrial Haplogroup H1 in North Africa: An Early
Holocene Arrival from Iberia
PLoS ONE October 2010 | Volume 5 | Issue 10

Page 8
The mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic acid (mtDNA)
has been particularly useful for studies of human evolution
and prehistoricmigrations [49, 118, 119]. Its high copy num-
ber, maternal inheritance, lack of recombination, and high
mutation rate have made mtDNA an important molecule in
tracing human descent back to several thousand years [118].

This means that all contemporary non-African humans
have descended from either M or N haplogroups, both
derived from the ancestral African haplogroup L3 (Beyin
2011).

Introduction
"In the last few years the story of human migrations has been
extensively reconstructed thanks to the contribution of archaeol-
ogy and genetics, particularly the latter through the study of the
two uniparentally transmitted genetic systems: mitochondrial
DNA (mtDNA) and Y chromosome (Ottoni et al. 2010)."

http://anthro.palomar.edu/homo2/mod_homo_4.htm
  "This is consistent with the hypothesis that humans expanded again
and again out of Africa"

 "It is now clear that early Homo sapiens, or modern humans, did not
come after the
 Neandertals but were their contemporaries.  However, it is likely
that both modern humans
 and Neandertals descended from Homo heidelbergensis."

This confirms what DNA experts have claimed all along:
 Together these analyses of Neanderthal DNA provide support for the
hypothesis of no or a very low gene flow between the Neanderthals and
modern humans and points to the Neanderthals as a separate branch of
hominid evolution [5].

Ovchinnikov et al.
Comparison Of Modern Human and Neanderthal DNA.
Nature 2000



Wed, 04 Jun 2014 07:55:15 GMT
 Lee/etc proves he is stupid

Quote:
>  A 195,000 year old fossil from the Omo 1
> site in Ethiopia shows the beginnings of the skull changes that we
> associate with modern people, including a rounded skull case and
> possibly a projecting chin."

They're saying that it's not modern. The words they use are
"Beginning to show," not "demonstrate conclusively."

It's also impossible to tell a modern human just from the skull.
If you had any idea WHAT a modern human is, if it wasn't just
another term you throw around without a clue -- similar to
"Lip Service," or "Bolide Forcing" or even "Molecular Clock --
you would know this.

You're a moron and you constantly prove it.



Wed, 04 Jun 2014 19:01:36 GMT
 Lee/etc proves he is stupid

Quote:

> They're saying that it's not modern. The words they use are
> "Beginning to show," not "demonstrate conclusively."

Ditto for China, did you have a point?


Wed, 04 Jun 2014 19:44:39 GMT
 Lee/etc proves he is stupid


Fri, 19 Jun 1992 00:00:00 GMT
 Lee/etc proves he is stupid

Quote:
>  A 195,000 year old fossil from the Omo 1
> site in Ethiopia shows the beginnings of the skull changes that we
> associate with modern people, including a rounded skull case and
> possibly a projecting chin."

They're saying that it's not modern. The words they use are
"Beginning to show," not "demonstrate conclusively."

It's also impossible to tell a modern human just from the skull.
If you had any idea WHAT a modern human is, if it wasn't just
another term you throw around without a clue -- similar to
"Lip Service," or "Bolide Forcing" or even "Molecular Clock --
you would know this.

You're a moron and you constantly prove it.



Thu, 05 Jun 2014 07:04:20 GMT
 
 [ 19 post ]  Go to page: [1] [2]

 Relevant Pages 

1. This Lee/etc is intensely stupid: Revisiting DHA

2. Lee/etc comes out with another WHOPPER of a stupid mistake

3. Lee/etc psycho proves JTEM right, as always!

4. JTEM proves his superiority over Lee/etc again

5. stupid stupid stupid SFs

6. Lee PROVES the Out of Europe theory on Human origins

7. Lee/etc's mother wishes he died at birth

8. Lee/etc Out of his mind

9. Cro Magnons evolved in Africa <= Lee/etc actually believes this

10. Lee (etc) is a threat to public safety


 
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software