The Rroma ("Gitano", "Gypsy", "Roma"): Diaspora and Origins
Author |
Message |
worrylesswarr.. #1 / 19
|
 The Rroma ("Gitano", "Gypsy", "Roma"): Diaspora and Origins
THE ROMA: ORIGINS AND DIASPORA by Ronald Lee For almost five-hundred years after we appeared in Europe in the late 14th and early 15th centuries, Europeans were asking where we had come from. By then, the Roma people had almost forgotten their origins in North-Central India although some Roma did tell Italians who asked them in the Italian City States in the 15th century. This has been buried in the archives until recently. Because dark-skinned people from the Middle-East had been brought to Europe before the arrival of the Roma by the Venetians and other entrepreneurs to perform as acrobats, jugglers, musicians and dancers and because these people were loosely called "Egyptians" the Roma too were identified as "Egyptians" which in English, was later shortened to "Gypsy." Some Roma groups had come to Central and Eastern Europe from a region in Greece called "Little Egypt" and others from Anatolia. Both of these regions were known as Kleine Aegypter in German which means "Little Egypt" or "Egypt Minor." Recent studies conducted by Indian scholars in India and by Romani scholars have finally confirmed the origins of the Romani people. We originated in India but were not one specific group of Indians, not all of one caste and not even one people. In the 11th century ad there was a group of petty kingdoms in Gurjara in the Northwest area of India in what was then the Rajput Confederacy. These were feudal-type societies composed of a caste of warrior-landowners ( Kshatriya ) and a supporting population of non-warriors composed of workers and artisans who did all the work for the ruling warrior caste. Some were farmers working with animals or bred and trained horses for the warrior caste who fought on horseback as cavalry. others were metal smiths, some entertainers, others craftspeople, silver smiths, gold smiths or laundry men and women, in other words, all the people needed to maintain a working society of people. Each family and clan of the sub-castes had a trade or profession which was practised by the family and clan as a whole. This was part of the Hindu religion called the Laws of Manu where everyone belonged to a particular caste which did a particular type of work. This is how the Roma were in Europe in the past, each family and clan had a work skill which was passed on from one generation to the next, music, horse-trading, brick making, coppersmithing or whatever. Many groups in this supporting population belonged to a collection of castes called Domba in the plural ( Dom (man) and Domni (woman) in the singular ) which then meant, "The People" or "Human Beings." Each of these small Rajput kingdoms was ruled by a thakur, or petty king and collectively, the kings served an elected king who was the supreme ruler. Thakur or Thagar exists in Romani in some dialects today meaning "leader.". In the early 11th Century ad, a Muslim kingdom arose in what is now Afghanistan called the Ghaznavid Empire. These Ghaznavids began raiding into India under their leader Mahmud Ghazni and came into direct conflict with the Rajput Confederacy. Until 1192, there was constant warfare, looting, destruction of towns and cities and disruption of the Rajput Confederacy. During this time, some Rajput groups were forced to migrate or move elsewhere to escape the destruction, massacres and slavery. Some moved South, some West but one or more groups decided to move North into the Upper-Indus Valley through Kashmir. They found refuge in the extreme North of India where the local people spoke Dardic languages. Here, the refugees livedfor a couple of generations or more and picked up some words and grammatical elements of Dardic which was added to their Sanskritic language from North-Central India. The Muslims from Afghanistan then moved up into the area where the ancestors of the Roma had established themselves and began raiding and plundering again. With no avenue of escape left, the harassed ancestors of the Roma then passed through the Shandur or Baroghil Passes into Asia and followed the Silk Road, used by caravans of traders, to ancient Persia. They remained in Persia for a few generations, then made their way into the Empire of Trebizond on the Black Sea where the local people spoke Armenian. The Roma then added Armenian words to the Persian words they had learned in Persia. The invasion of the Seljuk Turks then forced the Roma to leave Trebizond and they escaped into the Byzantine Empire around the city of Constantinople ( now Istanbul). Here we learned many Greek words. By this time, the original caste system of India had disappeared and the mixed group of tribes, castes and peoples who had left India had become one people speaking a common language which had by now become proto Romani. Since the Domba group composed the largest number of people and because they were the ones most suited to be able to survive by their skills outside of India, they became predominate and we now called ourselves Roma. The original D sound of Sanskrit had changed to an R during the migration from India as the original Indo-Aryan sounds were modified by surrounding non-Romani languages we had to speak to communicate with the local people. Originally, our language had three D sounds but one of these was changed to an R after we left India. From Byzantium, the Roma began to enter the Balkans by the 13th century and some groups slowly moved through the Slavic-speaking regions picking up words of old Serbian and other Slavic languages until they reached Rumania where we added a few Rumanian words to the Romani language. Other groups of Roma remained in the Balkans. This part of our history cannot be disputed because all Romani dialects spoken today from Wales in Britain to Siberia contain these same loan words from Dardic, Persian. Armenian, Byzantine Greek, Old Slavic and Rumanian. Had the exodus from India been through Afghanistan, as European scholars still maintain, Romani would have loan words from Pushtu and the other languages spoken there and could not have picked up the Dardic words and grammatical elements from the Upper Indus Valley. Also, Afghanistan was the centre of the Ghaznavid Empire, the people who had driven the ancestors of the Roma from India. Would Roma fleeing the Nazi Holocaust in World War II have tried to escape by fleeing back into Nazi Germany?. After reaching Rumania, groups of Roma drifted off in different directions in small groups, each with its leader, and made their way into all countries of Europe in the 15th century. By 1500 we were everywhere from the British Isles and Spain, as far east as Poland, as far North as Norway and still as far South as Greece. Many Roma remained in Wallachia and Moldavia where they were soon gradually enslaved and were held in {*filter*} until the Emancipation of 1865. Historians refer to this exodus, migration and dispersal of the Roma as origins and Diaspora. We originated in North-Central India, migrated via the Upper-Indus Valley, Persia, the Caucuses, Armenia, Byzantium, Greece, the Kingdom of Serbia and what is now Rumania to Eastern Europe and then split off into smallish groups and made our way into all the countries of Europe. Up to this point, we had travelled more or less together as one people and spoke a common Romani language. Once we dispersed into all the countries of Europe, we lost our unity as one people and our common language slowly deteriorated into a large number of dialects because we lived in different countries of Europe, were surrounded by non-Roma who spoke many languages which we borrowed from and because Roma living in Russia never met Roma from Greece, Bohemia or Britain and vice versa. Thus, the different groups of Roma that exist today, speaking different dialects, living in different countries, are the result of our history after we arrived in Europe. Originally, when we entered Europe, we were one people called Roma with an origin in India. How do we know when we left India? European scholars often maintain we left at different times as much as 500 years or more apart. This does not stand up to the evidence. The Romani language is a sister language of a group of Sanskrit-based languages such as Rajasthani, Hindi, Gujarati, Bengali, Multani and others. All of these languages developed in parallel. Linguistic evidence shows that Romani developed in parallel to them until the 11th century ad. Then, the sister languages continued to develop in parallel to one another in India while Romani did not. It was influenced by languages outside of India. Thus, there is no doubt that our ancestors left India in the 11th century ad. .Had groups of Roma left India 500 years earlier or later their Indian element of their Romani dialects would not be in parallel to other Romani dialects nor with the sister languages still spoken in India as they were grammatically in the 11th century ad. European scholars tried to define us by what we were in Europe. They assumed we had always been a caste of nomads even in India. This does not hold true. All words in Romani dialects today that have to do with a settled community with roots are words brought from India, for example gav (village), puv (land), ker (house), guruv (bull, ox), gurumni (cow), kaini (chicken), etc. On the other hand, words one would assume Indian nomads to have needed and preserved including the wild animals and birds are words borrowed from languages outside of India such as camp, tent, trail, spring, tiger, elephant, Furthermore, the military words in Romani such as xanro (sword), tover ( now axe or cutting tool but related to 'tulwar"), busht (spear), kuro ( horse), and patav (leggings, leg bindings, or "puttees"). Rajput cavalry wrapped their legs in strips of cloth to prevent them from chaffing against the rope stirrups they used .Why would nomads needs words such as this and why preserve them unless the Rajputs had led their followers out of India and maintained their
... read more »
|
Wed, 14 Mar 2007 21:37:17 GMT |
|
 |
P.Com #2 / 19
|
 The Rroma ("Gitano", "Gypsy", "Roma"): Diaspora and Origins
Thank you for an excellent article. Did the Roma people ever call themselves SINTI ??
Quote: > THE ROMA: > ORIGINS AND DIASPORA > by Ronald Lee > For almost five-hundred years after we appeared in Europe in the late 14th > and > early 15th centuries, Europeans were asking where we had come from. By > then, > the Roma people had almost forgotten their origins in North-Central India > although some Roma did tell Italians who asked them in the Italian City > States > in the 15th century. This has been buried in the archives until recently. > Because dark-skinned people from the Middle-East had been brought to > Europe > before the arrival of the Roma by the Venetians and other entrepreneurs to > perform as acrobats, jugglers, musicians and dancers and because these > people > were loosely called "Egyptians" the Roma too were identified as > "Egyptians" > which in English, was later shortened to "Gypsy." Some Roma groups had > come to > Central and Eastern Europe from a region in Greece called "Little Egypt" > and > others from Anatolia. Both of these regions were known as Kleine Aegypter > in > German which means "Little Egypt" or "Egypt Minor." > Recent studies conducted by Indian scholars in India and by Romani > scholars > have finally confirmed the origins of the Romani people. We originated in > India > but were not one specific group of Indians, not all of one caste and not > even > one people. In the 11th century ad there was a group of petty kingdoms in > Gurjara in the Northwest area of India in what was then the Rajput > Confederacy. > These were feudal-type societies composed of a caste of warrior-landowners > ( > Kshatriya ) and a supporting population of non-warriors composed of > workers and > artisans who did all the work for the ruling warrior caste. Some were > farmers > working with animals or bred and trained horses for the warrior caste who > fought on horseback as cavalry. others were metal smiths, some > entertainers, > others craftspeople, silver smiths, gold smiths or laundry men and women, > in > other words, all the people needed to maintain a working society of > people. > Each family and clan of the sub-castes had a trade or profession which was > practised by the family and clan as a whole. This was part of the Hindu > religion called the Laws of Manu where everyone belonged to a particular > caste > which did a particular type of work. This is how the Roma were in Europe > in the > past, each family and clan had a work skill which was passed on from one > generation to the next, music, horse-trading, brick making, coppersmithing > or > whatever. Many groups in this supporting population belonged to a > collection of > castes called Domba in the plural ( Dom (man) and Domni (woman) in the > singular > ) which then meant, "The People" or "Human Beings." Each of these small > Rajput > kingdoms was ruled by a thakur, or petty king and collectively, the kings > served an elected king who was the supreme ruler. Thakur or Thagar exists > in > Romani in some dialects today meaning "leader.". > In the early 11th Century ad, a Muslim kingdom arose in what is now > Afghanistan > called the Ghaznavid Empire. These Ghaznavids began raiding into India > under > their leader Mahmud Ghazni and came into direct conflict with the Rajput > Confederacy. Until 1192, there was constant warfare, looting, destruction > of > towns and cities and disruption of the Rajput Confederacy. During this > time, > some Rajput groups were forced to migrate or move elsewhere to escape the > destruction, massacres and slavery. Some moved South, some West but one or > more > groups decided to move North into the Upper-Indus Valley through Kashmir. > They > found refuge in the extreme North of India where the local people spoke > Dardic > languages. Here, the refugees livedfor a couple of generations or more and > picked up some words and grammatical elements of Dardic which was added to > their Sanskritic language from North-Central India. > The Muslims from Afghanistan then moved up into the area where the > ancestors of > the Roma had established themselves and began raiding and plundering > again. > With no avenue of escape left, the harassed ancestors of the Roma then > passed > through the Shandur or Baroghil Passes into Asia and followed the Silk > Road, > used by caravans of traders, to ancient Persia. They remained in Persia > for a > few generations, then made their way into the Empire of Trebizond on the > Black > Sea where the local people spoke Armenian. The Roma then added Armenian > words > to the Persian words they had learned in Persia. > The invasion of the Seljuk Turks then forced the Roma to leave Trebizond > and > they escaped into the Byzantine Empire around the city of Constantinople > ( now > Istanbul). Here we learned many Greek words. By this time, the original > caste > system of India had disappeared and the mixed group of tribes, castes and > peoples who had left India had become one people speaking a common > language > which had by now become proto Romani. Since the Domba group composed the > largest number of people and because they were the ones most suited to be > able > to survive by their skills outside of India, they became predominate and > we now > called ourselves Roma. The original D sound of Sanskrit had changed to an > R > during the migration from India as the original Indo-Aryan sounds were > modified > by surrounding non-Romani languages we had to speak to communicate with > the > local people. Originally, our language had three D sounds but one of these > was > changed to an R after we left India. > From Byzantium, the Roma began to enter the Balkans by the 13th century > and > some groups slowly moved through the Slavic-speaking regions picking up > words > of old Serbian and other Slavic languages until they reached Rumania where > we > added a few Rumanian words to the Romani language. Other groups of Roma > remained in the Balkans. This part of our history cannot be disputed > because > all Romani dialects spoken today from Wales in Britain to Siberia contain > these > same loan words from Dardic, Persian. Armenian, Byzantine Greek, Old > Slavic and > Rumanian. Had the exodus from India been through Afghanistan, as European > scholars still maintain, Romani would have loan words from Pushtu and the > other > languages spoken there and could not have picked up the Dardic words and > grammatical elements from the Upper Indus Valley. Also, Afghanistan was > the > centre of the Ghaznavid Empire, the people who had driven the ancestors of > the > Roma from India. Would Roma fleeing the Nazi Holocaust in World War II > have > tried to escape by fleeing back into Nazi Germany?. > After reaching Rumania, groups of Roma drifted off in different directions > in > small groups, each with its leader, and made their way into all countries > of > Europe in the 15th century. By 1500 we were everywhere from the British > Isles > and Spain, as far east as Poland, as far North as Norway and still as far > South > as Greece. Many Roma remained in Wallachia and Moldavia where they were > soon > gradually enslaved and were held in {*filter*} until the Emancipation of > 1865. > Historians refer to this exodus, migration and dispersal of the Roma as > origins > and Diaspora. We originated in North-Central India, migrated via the > Upper-Indus Valley, Persia, the Caucuses, Armenia, Byzantium, Greece, the > Kingdom of Serbia and what is now Rumania to Eastern Europe and then split > off > into smallish groups and made our way into all the countries of Europe. > Up to this point, we had travelled more or less together as one people and > spoke a common Romani language. Once we dispersed into all the countries > of > Europe, we lost our unity as one people and our common language slowly > deteriorated into a large number of dialects because we lived in different > countries of Europe, were surrounded by non-Roma who spoke many languages > which > we borrowed from and because Roma living in Russia never met Roma from > Greece, > Bohemia or Britain and vice versa. Thus, the different groups of Roma that > exist today, speaking different dialects, living in different countries, > are > the result of our history after we arrived in Europe. Originally, when we > entered Europe, we were one people called Roma with an origin in India. > How do we know when we left India? European scholars often maintain we > left at > different times as much as 500 years or more apart. This does not stand up > to > the evidence. The Romani language is a sister language of a group of > Sanskrit-based languages such as Rajasthani, Hindi, Gujarati, Bengali, > Multani > and others. All of these languages developed in parallel. Linguistic > evidence > shows that Romani developed in parallel to them until the 11th century ad. > Then, the sister languages continued to develop in parallel to one another > in > India while Romani did not. It was influenced by languages outside of > India. > Thus, there is no doubt that our ancestors left India in the 11th century > ad. > .Had groups of Roma left India 500 years earlier or later their Indian > element > of their Romani dialects would not be in parallel to other Romani dialects > nor > with the sister languages still spoken in India as they were grammatically > in > the 11th century ad. > European scholars tried to define us by what we were in Europe. They > assumed we > had always been a caste of nomads even in India. This does not hold true. > All > words in Romani dialects today that have to do with a settled community > with > roots are words brought from India, for example gav (village), puv (land), > ker > (house), guruv (bull, ox), gurumni (cow),
... read more »
|
Thu, 15 Mar 2007 03:40:52 GMT |
|
 |
alex #3 / 19
|
 The Rroma ("Gitano", "Gypsy", "Roma"): Diaspora and Origins
Quote: > THE ROMA: > ORIGINS AND DIASPORA > European scholars tried to define us by what we were in Europe. They assumed we > had always been a caste of nomads even in India. This does not hold true.
Setting aside linguistic arguments which stretch boundaries of my competence I want to mention that the gypsies in Eastern and Central Europe do remain largely restless, nomadic people with many failed attempts to settle behind them. During Soviet times the governments of Russia and her satellites tried to tie them to the land, small rural communities, some sort of productive labor, all in vain. Those attempts failed on a large scale with some individual success stories notwithstanding. A documentary I saw recently about Czechoslovakian/Hungarian gypsy community was complementary to what I have already known. Although some of the gypsies do settle, kind of, their lifestyle do not seem to be suggestive of their intention to put down roots and develop a community for future generations. They are almost ready to pick up and move at the slightest notice. The same situation was in Russia in many places in Soviet times. They are talented people especially musically and this aspect is appreciated by the locals, however, there have always been frictions between the gypsies and the latter. They have a reputation for stealing though in the environment they lived in there was not much available to steal. They seem to be content living in poverty. I want to use this post to draw people into a discussion on another phenomenon closer to home. A couple of years ago a surveillance camera in a parking lot of a large department store somewhere in the South caught a scene of a young mother physically punishing her daughter for some minor transgression. She then shoved her into an SUV and drove away. The police got the license plate number from the store security and a nation wide manhunt was on the way. The woman then saw herself on TV and freaked out. It turned out she had an attorney who had arranged for her to surrender and she probably received some probation eventually but for two weeks the papers were filled with fascinating details about her secretive community. She was an "Irish Gypsy." I think her last name was Young{*filter*} or Strong{*filter*} or something. They drift from place to place stealing from stores frequently using their kids as a decoy, diversion or as accomplices counting on the fact that the police would be unlikely to prosecute a juvenile. According to the papers they spend winters in a couple of communities in the United States where they socialize, make matrimonial arrangements and trade. They are highly materialistic and the status of a person depends on the number of cars they have and other signs of success. Keep in mind that everything they have has ostensibly been somewhere stolen. What tickled me the most is the frequent mentioning of their "strong" Catholic faith. That is something out of this world entirely. I am wondering if anyone has any information on this group? I think a kind of a special lingo was mentioned in their connection. Here I want to get back to the real gypsies, those who live in Russia. What is interesting is that they do not seem to have "an accent" when speak or sing in their tongue. OK, they migrated from India where the phonemes in many related languages are so different from the European languages, including English that this fact is difficult for many of them to overcome even after years of living in the West. It handicaps them with a heavy accent. The Russian and in general East European Gypsies have phonemic spectrum close to the surrounding languages, not the languages of the places they came from. This is quite an interesting subject. Any literature on this?
|
Thu, 15 Mar 2007 07:29:57 GMT |
|
 |
Ruud Harmse #4 / 19
|
 The Rroma ("Gitano", "Gypsy", "Roma"): Diaspora and Origins
sci.lang: Quote: >Here I want to get back to the real gypsies, those who live in Russia. What >is interesting is that they do not seem to have "an accent" when speak or >sing in their tongue. OK, they migrated from India where the phonemes in >many related languages are so different from the European languages, >including English that this fact is difficult for many of them to overcome >even after years of living in the West. It handicaps them with a heavy >accent. The Russian and in general East European Gypsies have phonemic >spectrum close to the surrounding languages, not the languages of the places >they came from. This is quite an interesting subject. Any literature on >this?
Anecdotal evidence: the few Gypsies that live where I live are often from ex-Yugoslavija, and speak accentless Croatian among themselves. Do Spanish Gypsies still have a language of their own, or do they speak only (Andalusian) Spanish? -- Ruud Harmsen - http://rudhar.com
|
Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:21:49 GMT |
|
 |
Miguel Carrasque #5 / 19
|
 The Rroma ("Gitano", "Gypsy", "Roma"): Diaspora and Origins
On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 11:21:49 +0200, Ruud Harmsen Quote:
>Do Spanish Gypsies still have a language of their own
No. They have retained a number of vocabulary items (e.g. bato = father, sacai = eye, cal = gypsy, payo = non-gypsy, camelar = to love, etc.), but the grammar is Spanish: <yo te camelo> = I love you. ======================= Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
|
Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:59:24 GMT |
|
 |
alex #6 / 19
|
 The Rroma ("Gitano", "Gypsy", "Roma"): Diaspora and Origins
I think her last name was Young{*filter*} or Strong{*filter*} or Quote: > something.
Her name was Terri Love{*filter*}. Finally it came up to me.
|
Thu, 15 Mar 2007 20:18:46 GMT |
|
 |
alex #7 / 19
|
 The Rroma ("Gitano", "Gypsy", "Roma"): Diaspora and Origins
http://sca.lib.liv.ac.uk/collections/gypsy/travell.htm http://groups.msn.com/romaintheuk/irishtravellers.msnw http://www.nccbuscc.org/mrs/pcmr/gypsy.htm http://www.gypsyloresociety.org/cultureintro.html
|
Fri, 16 Mar 2007 00:52:08 GMT |
|
 |
Raktizer Omhei #8 / 19
|
 The Rroma ("Gitano", "Gypsy", "Roma"): Diaspora and Origins
Quote: > THE ROMA: > ORIGINS AND DIASPORA > by Ronald Lee > For almost five-hundred years after we appeared in Europe in the late 14th and > early 15th centuries, Europeans were asking where we had come from. By then, > the Roma people had almost forgotten their origins in North-Central India > although some Roma did tell Italians who asked them in the Italian City States > in the 15th century. This has been buried in the archives until recently. > Recent studies conducted by Indian scholars in India and by Romani scholars > have finally confirmed the origins of the Romani people. We originated in India > but were not one specific group of Indians, not all of one caste and not even > one people. In the 11th century ad there was a group of petty kingdoms in > Gurjara in the Northwest area of India in what was then the Rajput Confederacy. > These were feudal-type societies composed of a caste of warrior-landowners ( > Kshatriya ) and a supporting population of non-warriors composed of workers and > artisans who did all the work for the ruling warrior caste. Some were farmers > working with animals or bred and trained horses for the warrior caste who > fought on horseback as cavalry. others were metal smiths, some entertainers, > others craftspeople, silver smiths, gold smiths or laundry men and women, in > other words, all the people needed to maintain a working society of
people. The members of the Indo - European linguistic family include the Germans , Slavs , Celts , Latins , Greeks , Albanians , Armenians , and the Indo - Iranians or Sanskrit Aryans , the latter branch including the Baltic Old Prussians , Lithuanians , and Latvians as well as the Iranians or Sankrit people of Iran , Afghanistan , Pakistan , and northern India . The word Aryan comes from the Sanskrit word " Arya , " which means " nobles , " or " owners of land . " When the Indo - European speaking Iranians invaded and conquered from 1500 B.C onwards from their original homelands of what is now southern Russia the lands of what today make the nation - states of Iran , Pakistan , Afghanistan , and India , they usually intermarried with the natives or earlier invaders , usually in the form of a master - slave relationship , where the conquered native women usually became the concubines of their harem - keeping slave master . The offspring of such relationships usually themselves became slaves , as the Colored or mixed - race/miscegenated people of Apartheid South Africa . In India , such so - called " half castes " formed the " Sudra " or " Labourer " caste , as opposed to the " Dasa ," or " black " caste , that is , the racially unmixed but enslaved dark - brown skinned Dravidian peoples of India . The words " Sudra " and " Dasa " belong to the Sanskrit branch of the Indo - European speaking people , as opposed to the non - Indo - European speaking Dravidian people. The various branches of the Indo - European speaking family came originally as semi - nomadic warrior hor{*filter*} and herders from the steppes and prairies of the lands north of the Black and Caspian seas , from where they conquered the other lands of Europe , the Middle East , and India from around 2500 B.C. onwards , gradually mixing with the previous inhabitants of those lands , with the conquered people usually reduced to the status of slaves and serfs . The remnants of the non - Indo - European speaking peoples include such ethnic and linguistic groups as the Guanches of the Canary Islands archipelago , the Basques of the Pyrenees , the Berbers or Hamites of the Atlas Mountain ranges of North - West Africa and the oases of the Sahara desert , and the Berbers are distant cousins of the Arabs , the Picts of the Scottish Higlands , the Iberians of pre - 900 B.C. Spain and Portugal , the Arabs , the Sumerians , the Georgians of the Caucasus Mountain range that separates Turkey from Georgia , Armenia , and Azerbaijan , the Lapps , Finns , Estonians , Hungarians , and Turks , the Burushaski of the Hunza Valley of Pakistan , the Dravidians of the Punjab and of central and southern India , the Elamites of Iran before the coming of the Iranians in around 1500 B.C. onwards , the Ligurians and Elymians of pre - 1000 B.C. Italy and Sicily , the Pelasgoi and Eteo - Cretans of pre - 2000 B.C. Greece and Crete , the Lydians , of whom the Etruscans traced their ancestry from , Mysians , Carians , Pamphylians and Cappadocians of what is now the Turkish or Anatolian peninsula before the conquests of Alexander the Great , and the Ainu of Hokkaido , Sakhalin , the Pacific provinces of Russian Siberia , the Kurile Islands , and the Kamchatka Peninsula .
|
Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:43:10 GMT |
|
 |
alex #9 / 19
|
 The Rroma ("Gitano", "Gypsy", "Roma"): Diaspora and Origins
Quote: > and the > Ainu of Hokkaido , Sakhalin , the Pacific provinces of Russian Siberia , the > Kurile Islands , and the Kamchatka Peninsula .
It's been said that the wave of emigrants from Korean peninsula onto Japanese Islands 4000 years ago misplaced the natives (Ainu) who now live in less desirable, less accessible areas of the country (Hokkaido). A provocative contrarian version has been expressed, however. According to this anthropologist whose name I cannot recall the wave of migrants did come but the natives kept the command position, essentially enslaving them or making them to work for them. He came to this conclusion by studying skulls and other skeletal features of the "ruling cast" of Japanese society and those of Ainus and found more similarities between the latter than between the ruling class and ordinary Japanese. In particular both Ainus and high ranking Japanese are dolichocephalic. Ordinary Japanese are brachiocephalic.
|
Fri, 16 Mar 2007 21:08:32 GMT |
|
 |
Raktizer Omhei #10 / 19
|
 The Rroma ("Gitano", "Gypsy", "Roma"): Diaspora and Origins
Quote: > > and the > > Ainu of Hokkaido , Sakhalin , the Pacific provinces of Russian Siberia , > the > > Kurile Islands , and the Kamchatka Peninsula . > It's been said that the wave of emigrants from Korean peninsula onto > Japanese Islands 4000 years ago misplaced the natives (Ainu) who now live in > less desirable, less accessible areas of the country (Hokkaido). > A provocative contrarian version has been expressed, however. According to > this anthropologist whose name I cannot recall the wave of migrants did come > but the natives kept the command position, essentially enslaving them or > making them to work for them. He came to this conclusion by studying skulls > and other skeletal features of the "ruling cast" of Japanese society and > those of Ainus and found more similarities between the latter than between > the ruling class and ordinary Japanese. In particular both Ainus and high > ranking Japanese are dolichocephalic. Ordinary Japanese are
brachiocephalic. The Ainu formed an important part of the Japanese knightly class called the samurai, many of whom intermarried with the Korean-descended Japanese ruling class. Recent D.N.A. tests prove that the people of northern Japan have a higher degree of part-Ainu ancestry than the people of the other parts of Japan. The Japanese language belongs to the Ural-Altaic language family, which includes Korean, Manchurian, Tungusic, Inner and Outer Mongolian, Turkish, Finnish, Estonian, Lapp, and Hungarian. The Ainu are closely related to the Eastern Finns, according to recent D.N.A. tests. The martial art of judo, which comes from the samurai martial art of jujitsu, was made a compulsory requirement in Japanese schools in 1911, although it was banned from Japanese schools from 1945 to 1951. The three techniques of judo are nagewaza [ throwing ], katamewaza [ wrestling ], and atemiwaza [ punching and kicking ]. Atemiwaza may only be taught to judokas above the rank of white belt, and may only be used by them in training and self-defense, but never in judo sporting competitions. During the Second World War, when low on bullets and food, Japanese soldiers would often launch a banzai bayonet charge and a judo-atemiwaza attack. After 1945, the three years compulsory military service for Japanese males over the age of 21 was abolished, although judo and jujitsu still forms an important part of the voluntary Japanese Self-Defense Forces to this day, and judo is still an important part of the Japanese physical education curriculum in our times.
|
Sat, 17 Mar 2007 10:12:37 GMT |
|
 |
Peter T. Daniel #11 / 19
|
 The Rroma ("Gitano", "Gypsy", "Roma"): Diaspora and Origins
Quote:
> > > and the > > > Ainu of Hokkaido , Sakhalin , the Pacific provinces of Russian Siberia , > > the > > > Kurile Islands , and the Kamchatka Peninsula . > > It's been said that the wave of emigrants from Korean peninsula onto > > Japanese Islands 4000 years ago misplaced the natives (Ainu) who now live > in > > less desirable, less accessible areas of the country (Hokkaido). > > A provocative contrarian version has been expressed, however. According to > > this anthropologist whose name I cannot recall the wave of migrants did > come > > but the natives kept the command position, essentially enslaving them or > > making them to work for them. He came to this conclusion by studying > skulls > > and other skeletal features of the "ruling cast" of Japanese society and > > those of Ainus and found more similarities between the latter than between > > the ruling class and ordinary Japanese. In particular both Ainus and high > > ranking Japanese are dolichocephalic. Ordinary Japanese are > brachiocephalic. > The Ainu formed an important part of the Japanese knightly class called the > samurai, many of whom intermarried with the Korean-descended Japanese ruling > class. Recent D.N.A. tests prove that the people of northern Japan have a > higher degree of part-Ainu ancestry than the people of the other parts of > Japan. The Japanese language belongs to the Ural-Altaic language family,
No one has advocated a "Ural-Altaic" phylum for a century or so. Quote: > which includes Korean, Manchurian, Tungusic, Inner and Outer Mongolian, > Turkish, Finnish, Estonian, Lapp, and Hungarian. The Ainu are closely > related to the Eastern Finns, according to recent D.N.A. tests. The martial > art of judo, which comes from the samurai martial art of jujitsu, was made a > compulsory requirement in Japanese schools in 1911, although it was banned > from Japanese schools from 1945 to 1951. The three techniques of judo are > nagewaza [ throwing ], katamewaza [ wrestling ], and atemiwaza [ punching > and kicking ]. Atemiwaza may only be taught to judokas above the rank of > white belt, and may only be used by them in training and self-defense, but > never in judo sporting competitions. During the Second World War, when low > on bullets and food, Japanese soldiers would often launch a banzai bayonet > charge and a judo-atemiwaza attack. After 1945, the three years compulsory > military service for Japanese males over the age of 21 was abolished, > although judo and jujitsu still forms an important part of the voluntary > Japanese Self-Defense Forces to this day, and judo is still an important > part of the Japanese physical education curriculum in our times.
--
|
Sat, 17 Mar 2007 20:25:28 GMT |
|
 |
worrylesswarr.. #12 / 19
|
 The Rroma ("Gitano", "Gypsy", "Roma"): Diaspora and Origins
Hello P.Comm, I do recall that there was one tribe of Rromas who called themselves "Sinti", which sounds strikingly similar to Sindhi. This is why some observers think that the Rroma may come from the Sindh area. Personally, I think that the Rromas come from the Sindh/Rajastan and maybe Punjab areas. Quote: > Thank you for an excellent article. Did the Roma people ever call > themselves SINTI ??
|
Sat, 17 Mar 2007 23:30:54 GMT |
|
 |
worrylesswarr.. #13 / 19
|
 The Rroma ("Gitano", "Gypsy", "Roma"): Diaspora and Origins
Hello AlexV: Let me answer your points one-by-one... Quote: > A documentary I saw recently about Czechoslovakian/Hungarian gypsy community > was complementary to what I have already known. Although some of the gypsies > do settle, kind of, their lifestyle do not seem to be suggestive of their > intention to put down roots and develop a community for future generations. > They are almost ready to pick up and move at the slightest notice. The same > situation was in Russia in many places in Soviet times.
I wonder why they are so nomadic? Is it because they feel economically and culurally disenfranchised? I do notice that they have a "rambling man" gene. I see this wanderlust exhibited in Punjabis, Gujaratis, and Sindhis a lot. They're able to move on far and wide and park their cars in their host country until another economic opportunity calls for them. Quote: > They are talented people especially musically and this aspect is appreciated > by the locals, however, there have always been frictions between the gypsies > and the latter. They have a reputation for stealing though in the > environment they lived in there was not much available to steal. They seem > to be content living in poverty.
National Geographic did a report on them a few years ago, maybe 1.5 years ago. It indicates that they the Rroma don't aspire for much. And they do steal a lot. The NG reporter actually got mugged by a Rroma! Quote: > I want to use this post to draw people into a discussion on another > phenomenon closer to home. A couple of years ago a surveillance camera in a > parking lot of a large department store somewhere in the South caught a > scene of a young mother physically punishing her daughter for some minor > transgression. She then shoved her into an SUV and drove away. The police > got the license plate number from the store security and a nation wide > manhunt was on the way. The woman then saw herself on TV and freaked out.
AlexV, that case was widely known in the USA. She was a Traveling Irish, or something to that effect. Supposedly, this community are independent of Rromas. I visited the Traveling Irish's website, and it seems to indicate that they are independent of the Rromas. Quote: > They drift from place to place stealing from stores frequently using their > kids as a decoy, diversion or as accomplices counting on the fact that the > police would be unlikely to prosecute a juvenile.
I heard about this. Also, they are talented scamsters, supposedly. They sell things which don't work. Quote: > According to the papers they spend winters in a couple of communities in the > United States where they socialize, make matrimonial arrangements and trade. > They are highly materialistic and the status of a person depends on the > number of cars they have and other signs of success. Keep in mind that > everything they have has ostensibly been somewhere stolen.
I didn't get the impression that they are materialistic. Instead, i thought that they were wanderlusters and didn't care for materialism. They only cared for today and not worried about tomorrow. Quote: > Here I want to get back to the real gypsies, those who live in Russia. What > is interesting is that they do not seem to have "an accent" when speak or > sing in their tongue. OK, they migrated from India where the phonemes in > many related languages are so different from the European languages, > including English that this fact is difficult for many of them to overcome > even after years of living in the West. It handicaps them with a heavy > accent. The Russian and in general East European Gypsies have phonemic > spectrum close to the surrounding languages, not the languages of the places > they came from. This is quite an interesting subject. Any literature on > this?
Can't help you hear. Although I do know that many Rromas living in the USA like to compare their words with Hindi/Punjabi language. There are many similiarties since both languages are Indo-Iranian.
|
Sat, 17 Mar 2007 23:39:11 GMT |
|
 |
worrylesswarr.. #14 / 19
|
 The Rroma ("Gitano", "Gypsy", "Roma"): Diaspora and Origins
There seems to be internal contradictions here. One website says that they are not related to the Rromas. Another says that they are a sub-sect of the Rromas. What do you think?
|
Sat, 17 Mar 2007 23:40:25 GMT |
|
 |
worrylesswarr.. #15 / 19
|
 The Rroma ("Gitano", "Gypsy", "Roma"): Diaspora and Origins
Raktizer Omheit, Thanks for the info, but what does it have to do with the Rroma?
|
Sat, 17 Mar 2007 23:43:28 GMT |
|
|
Page 1 of 2
|
[ 19 post ] |
|
Go to page:
[1]
[2] |
|